Jump to content
Message added by proffrink

Mod note: Yes, you can discuss any airsoft-related listing from any website in this thread. This includes listings on AF-UK itself.

 

Please stay on topic (i.e. about these items). Off-topic posts will be removed.

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, Rogerborg said:

£10 more than new retail, but on the other hand, he won't post it. :lol:

 

 

 

Check out his page, 17th august 'how to remove crappy paint job thread'

Next post is a S&T G36C red and black for £130 in the classifieds...unsold

Now its the excat same gun but without the paint that was won in a competion.....

Is this but a coincidence?

  • Supporters
Posted

'Kin hell, I hadn't even looked at the pictures, but there's horrid lines on it from the 2 tone removal.  Poor gun, someone needs to rescue it.

Posted
On 28/09/2018 at 14:15, MrGlitter69 said:

Check out his page, 17th august 'how to remove crappy paint job thread'

Next post is a S&T G36C red and black for £130 in the classifieds...unsold

Now its the excat same gun but without the paint that was won in a competion.....

Is this but a coincidence?

He's been trying to sell it longer than that...

 

And when questioned about it by @Jedi_Master, he's refuted it being two tone......

I'll take two!

 

Edit- he's been selling it longer than I thought:

 

  • Head Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, Huxley said:

What a mongoloid.

 

Do not be a duffer, no need for any personal insults. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Jedi_Master said:

 

Do not be a duffer, no need for any personal insults. 

 

*Googles duffer......

 

 

Aah no not my intention, but seriously he does this and thinks no one will notice?
 

 

A genuine mistake is fair enough, but intentionally misleading gets both  barrels I'm afraid.

No sympathy when you try to pull a fast one.

 

But I fail to see how you say no insults, yet proceed to call me a duffer ;)

 

Learn something new every day........

 

 

  • Supporters
Posted

I do hope this scammer is now banned from the forum , think it’s fair to say most forum users wouldn't want fraudsters on here ?  

  • Moderators
Posted
3 minutes ago, Druid799 said:

I do hope this scammer is now banned from the forum , think it’s fair to say most forum users wouldn't want fraudsters on here ?  

Second that, the fact that he's too stupid to be a competent scammer is irrelevant, he's clearly telling lotsa porkies in an attempt to shift his ("cough") "new" tat.?

Posted
51 minutes ago, Huxley said:

 

*Googles duffer......

 

 

Aah no not my intention, but seriously he does this and thinks no one will notice?
 

 

A genuine mistake is fair enough, but intentionally misleading gets both  barrels I'm afraid.

No sympathy when you try to pull a fast one.

 

But I fail to see how you say no insults, yet proceed to call me a duffer ;)

 

Learn something new every day........

 

 

 

Hes making reference to a former member that he doesn’t like 

  • Head Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Huxley said:

 

*Googles duffer...

 

16 minutes ago, E21A said:

 

Hes making reference to a former member that he doesn’t like 

 

The dictionary meaning is correct; a person who is slow to learn.  Can be considered an appropriate reference to someone who used ad hominem insults and was unable to comprehend the forum rules. 

Posted

I would like a g36 as and experiment/learning experience in modding a gun.  I'd maybe bite for one at around the £50 mark.... though for collection id expect to pay less

 

was an old TM one on here a while back that i kicked myself for not buying

 

*too much of a coward to risk his perfectly working guns to tinker*

Posted
1 hour ago, Jedi_Master said:

 

 

The dictionary meaning is correct; a person who is slow to learnCan be considered an appropriate reference to someone who used ad hominem insults and was unable to comprehend the forum rules. 

 

And yet you fail to see the irony in what you're doing......

  • Mostly Retired Moderators
Posted

Regarding the chap with the G36.

I've invited him to see the... "Constructive criticism"  He's receiving here.

 

Might help him realise he's over estimating its value somewhat.

  • Supporters
Posted
9 hours ago, Tackle said:

he's clearly telling lotsa porkies in an attempt to shift his ("cough") "new" tat

 

Not necessarily. He's not claiming that it's "new", just that it's never been skirmished.  That could be true.  He's omitted the information that it's an ex two-tone, but as a non-business seller is not obliged to disclose it. The pictures are clear enough.  I'd call caveat emptor on that.

 

  • Moderators
Posted
4 hours ago, Rogerborg said:

 

Not necessarily. He's not claiming that it's "new", just that it's never been skirmished.  That could be true.  He's omitted the information that it's an ex two-tone, but as a non-business seller is not obliged to disclose it. The pictures are clear enough.  I'd call caveat emptor on that.

 

Nah, he's clearly a shifty sh#tcnut who is being deceitful, his previous attempts to flog it have no mention of "unskirmished competition prize" etc, obviously he thinks reinventing his G36 is what's needed to shift it.

In this great game/sport we play trust is paramount, not just in the game play, we should be able to trust other sellers too (in a perfect world?), fuck buyer beware etc, if someone's caught out then good riddance, threads like this aren't allowed on most other forums which is a shame, more like this might get rid of a lot of the shitbags.

Posted
10 hours ago, Rogerborg said:

He's omitted the information that it's an ex two-tone, but as a non-business seller is not obliged to disclose it. The pictures are clear enough.  I'd call caveat emptor on that.

 

He's not omitted that it's an ex two-tone - when asked by @Jedi Knight, he's clearly stated that it is not an ex two tone:

 

 

Screen Shot 2018-09-30 at 18.20.30.png

  • Mostly Retired Moderators
Posted

I've just noticed that our G36 friend has lowered the asking price on his previously stripey G36.

 

Call off the dogs, Mack's Law has prevailed!

Posted
On 29/09/2018 at 22:29, E21A said:

 

Hes making reference to a former member that he doesn’t like 

 

*Correction* That anyone liked

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...