Jump to content

Suggestion - Require approval on new threads for new users (i.e less than 10 posts)


Speedbird_666
 Share

This thread is over three months old. Please be sure that your post is appropriate as it will revive this otherwise old (and possibly forgotten) topic.

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators

Agree, I've banned dozens the over the last week, who knew there were so many witch doctors out there🤣

Definitely need something new, spammer signs up & 10 minutes later they've created about 15 absurd threads, it will drive genuine members away if they can't be arsed to trawl through the crap to find the Airsoft stuff. 

4 minutes ago, Speedbird_666 said:

Well, at least they've moved on from drugs....🙄

 

image.thumb.png.f07cf0f388b8d29414bdeea44e3af38e.png

Great.....not, to make matters worse they look underage, someone randomly passes through & sees that they'll think it's a nonce forum😬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

@Jedi_MasterMaybe it's time then to start with the "moody country" ip ban, see if that makes a difference, if it does, great, if not, consider other options. 

It seems like the easiest option initially, requiring not much mod work once set up. 

Although it does make me wonder about sites like zeroin, while it's a bit of a ghost town of late, don't see any spam popping up, wonder how they've filtered or blocked it ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head Moderator
1 hour ago, Tackle said:

@Jedi_MasterMaybe it's time then to start with the "moody country" ip ban, see if that makes a difference, if it does, great, if not, consider other options. 

It seems like the easiest option initially, requiring not much mod work once set up. 

Although it does make me wonder about sites like zeroin, while it's a bit of a ghost town of late, don't see any spam popping up, wonder how they've filtered or blocked it ? 

 

 I would love to blanket ban certain countries where all this spam is originating from. However, they tend to use VPNs which means it is not as simple. Something for the root admin to work on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
2 hours ago, Jedi_Master said:

 

 I would love to blanket ban certain countries where all this spam is originating from. However, they tend to use VPNs which means it is not as simple. Something for the root admin to work on.

I agree, & I know frig all about vpn's etc, but at the same time trying to advertise the services of a witch doctor etc on a UK airsoft forum doesn't exactly scream "sophisticated", there's always the possibility that this wave of spammers is nothing more than a poor attempt at data harvesting by ill informed chancers who don't have the best masking technology. 

Now if they had created some convincing looking posts offering cheap tactical kit or gnu's, with pics showing them being modelled by an airsoft god such as myself 😏, they'd have got loads of hits. 

images (81).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporters
27 minutes ago, Rogerborg said:

The chances of global spambots using a UK VPN is slim.  If we could whitelist UK IPs I think that would help significantly.  However, there are 13,000+ ranges covering 128 million+ IPv4 addresses (seems like there should be more) so I'm not sure of the practicality.

 

How about requiring one / a few uprates on a user's first post before they can make any more?  We tend to love-bomb new members, it shouldn't be hard to get some 💙.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can a minimum number of posts (new topics or replies) be forcibly subject to pre-approval before they're given free rein?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not a cooling off period between registering and first post?

Another forum I joined many years ago now verifies email addresses before allowing new users to post.

I remember in the dim.and distant days of moderating UKASC emails had to be "proper" ISP addresses, but now everyone used GMail and Yahoo so it isn't practical banning "pop-ups".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/01/2024 at 09:59, John_W said:

Why not a cooling off period between registering and first post?

Another forum I joined many years ago now verifies email addresses before allowing new users to post.

I remember in the dim.and distant days of moderating UKASC emails had to be "proper" ISP addresses, but now everyone used GMail and Yahoo so it isn't practical banning "pop-ups".


Getting hammered today lads

Time to get the wack a mole out 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
41 minutes ago, Enid_Puceflange said:


Getting hammered today lads

Time to get the wack a mole out 😆

On it, 7 or 8 new "members" banned🤬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
3 hours ago, Enid_Puceflange said:


Looks like you are about to whack number 8 or 9 for the day imminently 😉

Got him lol

 

Edit: & just now another one, that's 10 so far today for me, Dunno about the other guys ? 

Edited by Tackle
Add info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tackle said:

Got him lol

 

Edit: & just now another one, that's 10 so far today for me, Dunno about the other guys ? 

You a hero man 💪😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Tackle said:

Got him lol

 

Edit: & just now another one, that's 10 so far today for me, Dunno about the other guys ? 

 

I average 4-5 a day, including preemptive bans on new users (some are easily identified). 

 

Just banned my first actual spammer for today. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will someone please turn on first post limits or something? I will happily go on a list to check and accept/decline posts but it's getting bloody ridiculous now!

Edited by DanBow
gif didn't work
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DanBow said:

Will someone please turn on first post limits or something? I will happily go on a list to check and accept/decline posts but it's getting bloody ridiculous now!

 

Well, compared to last year, the Spam is being dealt with much quicker. 

 

Previously, we were reliant on the legacy  admin/mods to clean up the spam which made the forum unusable at points. Since the appointment of Spam Moderators, the Spam has been dealt with in minutes rather than hours. 

 

I think there is more that can be done (hence starting this thread) but we are still in a better place than 12 months ago. 

 

I believe 4 spam mods were originally appointed:

 

@Tackle, @RostokMcSpoons, myself and Rocketdogbert (who no longer seems to be a forum member? Anybody know happened there?) 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not too bad.

Yes, quite a few spam posts come in at a time but you guys are doing a good job cleaning up as soon as they get reported.

 

Hmm, I hope Rocketdogbert is doing OK.  Very strange that he's not posted in a while and he's no longer in the list.  Maybe he banned himself by mistake 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

I think rocketdogbert had the arse, understandably, about the spam situation making the forum unusable, plus the bickering that was going on mainly due to one members narrow views, meant he decided to take a break. 

I do hope he comes back, he was one of the core members that always had valid points to input thanks to years of experience. 

If I remember rightly, he'd also taken a break from skirmishes, focusing more on target shooting at his local gun club in Essex ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, EDcase said:

but you guys are doing a good job cleaning up as soon as they get reported.

 

 

Just to note - we don't get those reports. Everything that we Spam Mods clean up is as a result of regularly checking the forums throughout the day. 

 

The reports go to the 'proper' moderators. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work alot of night shifts and I've noticed the majority of spam appears in the early morning so if another spam mod is needed I'll happily volunteer 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporters

Invision doesn't seem particularly extensible, but it does have some spam and membership options that might be worth exploring.

 

e.g.

 

Allow registration, but require approval of all posts

Flag the account for manual review

 

All taking up moderator time and punishing the innocent, sadly.  I don't see an obvious way to limit a new user's post rate or allow user/community moderation to raise their trust level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is over three months old. Please be sure that your post is appropriate as it will revive this otherwise old (and possibly forgotten) topic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...