Sacarathe

If we want ads, we turn on the TV.... I don't have a TV. EDIT: And tell us if he's not sponsored because right now we're all thinking the same.

You're so funny, its so obvious this is a clickbait post intended for us to do our own research an be like "oooo" "oooh" "where can i buy" this guy is treating us to some very special advertising psychology - as though we were children.

Or: * does not = " "(a space)

Aye, I just figure 34 results is more manageable than 341.

Fixed. allinurl: hpa site:airsoft-forums.co.uk (Obviously Proffink's code still has merit and use.)

This is an unacceptable resolution, it's not dramatic enough. Nice Sig.

Do they really; How can you tell? What would be the point? Rated goggles will do what they are supposed to.

Which type?

http://www.mississippiautoarms.com/tromix-aluminum-stock-p-3066.html?zenid=2440794e70c4eab680565f1cc65107c1 http://www.tromix.com/saiga-parts.html Four minutes with google. That's a nice looking shotgun in the OP!

Ah, but that's not what I said! Nevertheless, I don't doubt what you've said.

What I am referring to is clearly visible in photos. I'm not worried about the foam breaking to a BB, the angles are rather specific, i've taken steps to prevent entry from below. I was hoping to ventilate them further though by adding 3mm holes in the foam where the plastic supports do not leave gaps greater than 4mm.

Leading from http://www.airsoft-forums.co.uk/index.php/topic/28853-revision-bullet-ant-goggles/ I've seen advice online and occasionally here, and on you tube to remove the foam on full seal eye protection. I don't know how it is on others, but on my Smith Optics, that would create openings laterally larger than 6mm - I already have some difficulty believing the foam would stop a BB. Does removing foam generally compromise the full seal, and people are just ignoring it? The best eye pro i've seen was with the lens raised off the frame by 2-3mm suspended on 5-6 pillars such that it had completely free airflow.

The OP was a little negative, but now he knows, he knows:- People do, in fact, spend money. I wonder what the fellows over at LARP would make of the notion of omnidirectional gear snobbery in airsoft.

There was not intent to be rude, but this vid sits nicely in several ongoing threads. http://www.airsoft-forums.co.uk/index.php/topic/28663-market-research-in-relation-to-education-drones-in-airsoft/?hl=drone http://www.airsoft-forums.co.uk/index.php/topic/29341-probably-the-most-ridiculous-idea-you-will-ever-hear-about-airsoft/?hl=drone OLD but still relevant: http://www.airsoft-forums.co.uk/index.php/topic/22433-drone-cameras-for-airsoft-days/?hl=drone http://www.airsoft-forums.co.uk/index.php/topic/24899-rc-vehicle-use-in-airsoft/?hl=drone#entry183786 http://www.airsoft-forums.co.uk/index.php/topic/24710-drones-quadcopters/?hl=drone#entry181793

Forum search is a thing, Honest! /sour Edit the title to "Camera Drones in Airsoft" EDIT: Enjoyable video. EDIT2: Can you trust that no one would shoot it? Well, you'll have to put a fishbowl on the bottom just in case.

Golf clubs, cars, fish, in the end it doesn't matter. If you're asking what you should do? Do whatever makes you happy. True. As example: I've never bought anything (over £20) I couldn't justify a practical use for in airsoft, but boy have I bought a lot of stuff I did not need. The turning moment was having to spend £400 on boots to correct a disability, and another £100 on helmet/eyepro/mask. After that, a lot of stuff seemed cheaper than it actually was. Those are the best boots I ever did wear, even if the initial product - magnum panther 8s only cost £40. I had never previously owned supportive boots, nor been able to wear wellingtons for that matter, so as a consequence of playing airsoft and paying that, I also got to play with mud this year. /end story.

It's not different to wearing armour in paintball; combat gear has pockets where you need it, combat style armour has the same. The peculiarity, is stuff that you cannot define a function or purpose with using. I've been playing for over 6 months now, and I've still not bought a torch, because I haven't a use for one - its the way it goes, buy stuff YOU think is useful. I've found a platecarrier very useful at avoiding full auto friendly fire - as for carrying stuff, I found a battlebelt worked much better, and I prefer to run the carrier naked. I strongly agree with Jedi above about gloves, helmet, sling. Helmets are excellent, particularly if you have any disability affecting your balance.

Seriously consider buying one of these or alternative. I had one, and still got my reflex shattered on the first day out - from behind.

I've never understood this, many times when I was new to airsoft I started at ZO with their large collection of [out of stock] items, but found stuff elsewhere due to lack of descriptions. They only seem to be able to cut and paste eh? That said, they're frequent goldmine for instock pricematching.

Weapons!? These be Toys in these woods. You're certainly doing the right thing asking.

So, if you have the abbey 100% silicone oil in your barrel, how'd you get it out?

Do they mark the value down?

Poster hasn't been back since the minute the thread was posted, dislike people that do that, "fill out our form, but if you have any interesting ideas **** off.

First AEG, not an M4(magazine) rifle, have you considered CYMA/JG - unless you're sure the ergonomics of that platform are for you? I have the K, and I find that theres not much wrong with it externally or ergonomically, it has cheap internals, but making that statement without owning it more than three months is its own fallacy; I've yet to find out the downsides of cheap internals. Though, if you can get a definitively better brand for less than £200 ignore me.