Adolf Hamster

this is the appraisals section, for if you want to price check an ad. if you're actually selling then the classifieds is this way -> https://airsoft-forums.uk/classifieds/

so what is it?

oh indeed, but that's the option we'd all rather we weren't forced to take.

no, can still see his fingers..... this, voting with your feet works great but only when there's competition to go to.

we've been here before too dammit sir! you have broken the chain!

in fairness, that pic might be creative, but not sure i'd call it blind firing? still has an arm and a face to shoot at....

this is kind of the point of the thread, north of 20 generally being considered faster than necessary. can confirm, fell for that trap and the simple version is against a sufficiently plot-armour clad target no volume of plastic is sufficient.

whiteholespewingtimeenginesdeadadviceplease

it's not necessarily the brand of bb's, but the majority of times i've seen this issue, better bb's have fixed the problem. particularly when it's binding in the magazine is the root cause. that said, it's typically an issue you'd see more often in midcaps with a double stack single-feed, as opposed to hicaps which are single stack single feed (and as such don't bind so much) there are other candidates, weak magazine or a pew running too fast without a delayer chip (typically manifests on auto but not semi). a longer nozzle can do it but usually that blocks everything.

is this on the specna's? because that was the exact issue (using laser dots admittedly) that started me down the path of running geoffs.

not to mention i ain't so sure that material is weldable.....

oh god it's not just your taste..... and bearing in mind i find the offset of a pk1 to be within acceptable limits........ i have run a mini dot on a gas block rail before (doctor/rmr type/size) which is nice and low and works quite well, although i'm a sucker for the siderail stuff.

i've never seen one before but i'm guessing it's a white hole

then use those

getting into the territory of personal preference. generally for a forward mounted optic a gas block replacement with an integrated rail tend to have adjustments that let you lock everything down tight for zero retention. ofc how much zero retention you care about in an airsoft pew is a different story, and if you're moving the optic to other guns then it's irrelevant anyway as you'd need to readjust on fitting. you may find that fitment won't be ideal, it's pretty normal for ak furniture to have a degree of fettling required to fit nice and tight on a given body.

tl:dr use geoffs.....

Unless cyma have decided to be weird about it, and i dont see why they would then that is how its supposed to come off (copies the original)

it's entirely plausible that some guns will be better at handling bad ammo. especially as you start pushing for more performance they can become fussier eaters.

many?

I'm inclined to agree. There may well be something else going on, but ammo is a relatively easy thing to take out of the equation.

the skeptic in me does wonder how often this is genuinely an insurance requirement rather than a hand-waving exercise. because if the insurance were going into such specifics then it'd be more than just co2 on the list to be banned.

which isn't an excuse.

sounds like they've decided banning hardware is the easy solution to the problem of asshole players which fills me with confidence over the standard of play.....

it's a tricky one, as all guns do tend to sound different naturally, depending on the gearing, the motor etc. can be very subtle. loose isn't so much the problem as tight, which would drag on the motor. that said, it doesn't sound like it'd be tight enough to halt a 7.4v.....