Jump to content

Lozart

Supporters
  • Posts

    7,976
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    169
  • Feedback

    100%

Posts posted by Lozart

  1. 28 minutes ago, JimFromHorsham said:

    Looks like a TM M4 S-System to me .

     

     

    ISTR the TM had M&P markings though

    1 minute ago, Lozart said:

     

     

    ISTR the TM had M&P markings though

     

    Scratch that, I've seen it with both! Probably depends on when it was made.

    12 hours ago, Lozart said:

    Can you get a close up of the right hand side of the gun? What do the markings just behind the mag release say?

     

     

     

    That would in fact answer the question. If it is in fact the TM then it should say Made in Japan, Tokyo Marui, ASGK

  2. 20 hours ago, emilianoksa said:

     

     

    I was aware of the shortcomings of the early Beretta 92s, but it is good to hear that people are still happy with the performance of other Maruis with the smaller bbu volume. 

     

    I have the M9A1 and it is very much an excellent pistol. As for the cold, I'll let you know - I'll be skirmishing it this weekend!

  3. 49 minutes ago, DanBow said:

    So, I'm not going to get much from fitting one, although I like the idea of 2 or 3 shot burst, but I'm now a little confused about precocking!

     

    I completely understand the theory behind it but my MP5 has a specified rate of fire of 700 to 850 rounds per minute. Even if that's wildly overestimated and we say 600 pm, that's 10 per second! Each shot is a tenth of a second! Are you telling me that you can really notice a difference or is it something we tell ourselves because we have a need to fettle/upgrade to make ourselves feel better?

     

    For something like a DMR where you want super fast trigger response on Semi then yes, precocking does make a difference. On an MP5? Probably pointless.

     

  4. 14 hours ago, Tommikka said:

    EN166B is likely to be acceptable, but is a lower level of impact protection than EN166A …..  but if you run down the thread as below you may not be able to get lenses at that standard 

     

     

     

     

     

    Let's be fair, A is WAAAAAAY more than you would need for airsoft.

  5. 14 hours ago, TheFull9 said:

    Gonna thoroughly disagree with all airsofters knowing what deodorant is/that showering every day is a necessity.

     

    Tbh I don't see much of a difference between a bunch of airsoft players going to The Mall back when that ran (or one of the many other currently operating sites that are in the middle of a dense urban area) vs con attendees heading to their expo centre... or me just transporting a RIF from any address to another for a reason that's within the law i.e. to one of the techs I use.  Or buying a RIF from an airsoft shop and bring it home.  Or buying an air rifle or crossbow or whatever else from a shop and taking it home.

     

    If you let people see a 'gun' in public then guess what, ya dun fucked up son.  If you keep it totally hidden until you are within an area where gun-shaped things are legal to display and the appearance of said items is very much expected by everyone around, then that's going to be fine.

     

    Part of the briefing at The Mall was always pointing out that Thames Valley ARU were stationed just over the road so NOT using a gun bag was strongly discouraged!

  6. 18 hours ago, TheFull9 said:

    There was a time around the end of the freefloated quad rail era (but before KeyMod) where the latest cool tech in handguards was direct thread attachment i.e. screw-on accessories.  The holes in handguards of that era do resemble M-LOK, but the many threaded holes are the key indicator when trying to discern.  We're talking right around a decade ago now though so I'd imagine most folks just aren't aware.

     

    Honestly it was a great system that made forends thin and light, but often the accessories were proprietary to a given make of handguard which hampered adoption in the market and it all mostly vanished once KeyMod hit the big time.  Q are actually kinda going back to it now with their Q-Sert alternative system.

     

     

    Ah yes, the joy of HKey et al. Fun times.

  7. 15 hours ago, Sewdhull said:

    Where did you find the SEF receiver?  I can't recall seeing one and I mooched around MP5s for ages before buying one.

     

    My MP5s are Classic Army for the exact reason that I wanted SEF lowers. There's a few available as parts, I think ICS still do one.

  8. 59 minutes ago, Terry_Rist said:

    I have hacked up an ETU++ in the past to work in a P90 with a warhead brushless and it works fine (this was before they released the P90 optical mosfet) The only thing I am not sure about is if the Perun ETU still allows you to use the mag cut-off feature?  I haven't installed one in a replica that has a mag stop so have no idea how the mag stop functions and whether it is a mechanism linked to the trigger contacts or a separate switch via the control board, but probably worth checking that it is still supported beforehand if that feature is important to you.

     

    Magstop is via the trigger board, the ETU just replaces the plug in bit external to the gearbox.

  9. Yep, you can indeed turn it off with the ETU+

     

    Quote

    G&G ETU has an active brake, which is retained in our upgrade kit. Active brake allows to stop the motor after each shot. In case of double shot problem in replicas with high rate of fire, active brake will be an effective solution. It can also prevent compression of the main spring for a longer time, if you will fire a shot with AB on before a storing your replica for a longer time. Active brake is can be switched on or off at any time in few seconds.

     

    I've fitted one to my G&G SR25 so I can have precocking but I don't have a Warhead (yet).

×
×
  • Create New...