when it comes to gameplay while i've watched the usual suspects there's always elements of stuff that's not ideal, like the ever pervasive battlefield hit markers or clickbaity cheaters/fights/player justice stuff. i've seen a couple of gameplay vids from sites where i've been playing, and it's kinda dull compared to the actual gameplay, or maybe i'm just having more fun than the cameraman.
for reviews i've a few things:
1. review more than just wether or not it's ambidextrous, also i can see the rails, no need to point that out....
2. show takedown, show internals, highlight which key parts are proprietory and which ones are standard.
3. if you're going to do an accuracy test do it at longer than 10 feet indoors using .2's, if i gun can't hit a man sized target at that distance then it's useless.
4. gas effeciency is more than 10 shots in a nice air conditioned interior
5. if somethings bad say it's bad, even suggest ways it could be upgraded to improve it.
not so much airsoft, but gun related is i tend to like inrange tv's philosophy on reviews where you really need to be using the thing for a few months before you can really make a call on how good or not it is, for example i intend on expanding my makarov reviews section some time but i haven't used the kwc enough to give it a fair shout.