Moderators Jez_Armstrong Posted October 23 Moderators Share Posted October 23 Laugh all you want @MistakenMexican time will tell 😂 MistakenMexican 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmanNo2 Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 1 hour ago, Jez_Armstrong said: Laugh all you want @MistakenMexican time will tell 😂 So where are you getting your info from? What makes you so sure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MistakenMexican Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 33 minutes ago, hitmanNo2 said: So where are you getting your info from? What makes you so sure? Jez has already said 😂 On 19/10/2024 at 09:17, Jez_Armstrong said: A very VERY reliable source told me a certain company won't be making anymore Glocks hitmanNo2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Jez_Armstrong Posted October 23 Moderators Share Posted October 23 1 hour ago, hitmanNo2 said: So where are you getting your info from? What makes you so sure? I obviously can't drop my source in it otherwise I would have said so already, I wouldn't just say things like that for the hell of it It was from TM's mouth to them, they won't be making any more glocks We're just going to have to wait and see if that plays out, the fact the shortage of just the glocks on shelves already suggests that if you have one or plan to get one, to either grab one now hold onto it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krisz Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Jez_Armstrong said: I obviously can't drop my source in it otherwise I would have said so already, I wouldn't just say things like that for the hell of it It was from TM's mouth to them, they won't be making any more glocks We're just going to have to wait and see if that plays out, the fact the shortage of just the glocks on shelves already suggests that if you have one or plan to get one, to either grab one now hold onto it Shortage doesn't mean anything in itself when Marui makes guns in batches. Not long ago you couldn't get an NGRS mp5 in this country or magazines for it for example. Same story regarding Saiga gas mags. Shortage for several months sold out worldwide. Edited October 23 by Krisz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmanNo2 Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 28 minutes ago, Jez_Armstrong said: I obviously can't drop my source in it otherwise I would have said so already How does naming your source drop them in it? In what? This isn't some whistle blower confirming details of a top secret UFO recovery program... If a toy manufacturer has told them directly that something will no longer be made, why is that a secret? MistakenMexican 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Jez_Armstrong Posted October 23 Moderators Share Posted October 23 9 minutes ago, hitmanNo2 said: How does naming your source drop them in it? In what? This isn't some whistle blower confirming details of a top secret UFO recovery program... If a toy manufacturer has told them directly that something will no longer be made, why is that a secret? Because they asked me not to and I will respect that so please respect that I cannot say who You will either have to wait for more news on the subject from other parties or see for it pans out but i 100% believe what they told me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmanNo2 Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 Sounds like they're not all that confident in what they're saying if they don't want to be named tbh. Jez_Armstrong 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Jez_Armstrong Posted October 23 Moderators Share Posted October 23 1 minute ago, hitmanNo2 said: Sounds like they're not all that confident in what they're saying if they don't want to be named tbh. They very much are, this effects them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmanNo2 Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 There's literally no reason to not want to be named if they have rock solid intel unless they're afraid of looking like a clown if it all blows over and turns out to be nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ButcherBill Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 4 minutes ago, hitmanNo2 said: There's literally no reason to not want to be named if they have rock solid intel unless they're afraid of looking like a clown if it all blows over and turns out to be nothing. Let it go. Enid_Puceflange and Jez_Armstrong 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmanNo2 Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 Nah 😛 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Allen Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 48 minutes ago, hitmanNo2 said: There's literally no reason to not want to be named if they have rock solid intel unless they're afraid of looking like a clown if it all blows over and turns out to be nothing. There are valid reasons why they might not want to be named. Jez_Armstrong 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmanNo2 Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 Just now, Colin Allen said: There are valid reasons why they might not want to be named. For instance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiantKiwi Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 54 minutes ago, hitmanNo2 said: There's literally no reason to not want to be named if they have rock solid intel unless they're afraid of looking like a clown if it all blows over and turns out to be nothing. Jez used to be part of a very well known retailer at the time, he has contacts all over the retailers in the UK - if his source says something, it almost certainly is the case. Jez_Armstrong 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Allen Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 7 minutes ago, hitmanNo2 said: For instance? Does this really need explaining? Just two as examples: 1. The source got the information from someone who had been given it in confidence. 2. The source was given the information in confidence. Jez_Armstrong 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mightyjebus Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 If Glock have found a way to force TM to stop producing Glocks then I'd imagine HK will be interested in how they did it as well. MistakenMexican 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Allen Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 1 minute ago, mightyjebus said: If Glock have found a way to force TM to stop producing Glocks then I'd imagine HK will be interested in how they did it as well. A horse's head in the bed usually works well. MistakenMexican 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmanNo2 Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 23 minutes ago, GiantKiwi said: Jez used to be part of a very well known retailer at the time, he has contacts all over the retailers in the UK - if his source says something, it almost certainly is the case. I appreciate that but this source would have to be a Japanese distributor to have heard directly from TM seeing as TM only operate domestically. 16 minutes ago, Colin Allen said: Does this really need explaining? Just two as examples: 1. The source got the information from someone who had been given it in confidence. 2. The source was given the information in confidence. I don't think you're grasping what I'm asking. Yes, the source could be not being named because they asked. BUT WHY? Why would they need to be protected? A toy is potentially stopped being made. Jez's source is convinced this is 100% happening. What does it matter? Why would TM tell someone and tell them not to tell anyone? Do you see what I'm getting at? Why all the mystery over a toy? Not a dig at Jez but half of a story just annoys me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiantKiwi Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 17 minutes ago, hitmanNo2 said: I appreciate that but this source would have to be a Japanese distributor to have heard directly from TM seeing as TM only operate domestically. I don't think you're grasping what I'm asking. Yes, the source could be not being named because they asked. BUT WHY? Why would they need to be protected? A toy is potentially stopped being made. Jez's source is convinced this is 100% happening. What does it matter? Why would TM tell someone and tell them not to tell anyone? Do you see what I'm getting at? Why all the mystery over a toy? Not a dig at Jez but half of a story just annoys me. Almost certainly under an NDA. Breaching one can be ruinous. Jez_Armstrong 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Allen Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 26 minutes ago, hitmanNo2 said: I appreciate that but this source would have to be a Japanese distributor to have heard directly from TM seeing as TM only operate domestically. I don't think you're grasping what I'm asking. Yes, the source could be not being named because they asked. BUT WHY? Why would they need to be protected? A toy is potentially stopped being made. Jez's source is convinced this is 100% happening. What does it matter? Why would TM tell someone and tell them not to tell anyone? Do you see what I'm getting at? Why all the mystery over a toy? Not a dig at Jez but half of a story just annoys me. I fully grasp what you are asking; I am not sure that you grasp how businesses operate. The products may indeed be toys, but they are produced by businesses, who probably do not want information about their activities and any legal issues to be widely known; that is why we end up with non-disclosure agreements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impulse Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 (edited) It's amazing how some people don't understand how sources work. If a source asks for anonymity, you give them anonymity. It's journalism ethics 101 and there are legal protections around it. Also, someone in TAD posted a meme that made me literally laugh out loud. At work. In the office. People looked and thought I was weird, so now I'm sharing it with you Edited October 24 by Impulse MistakenMexican, Jez_Armstrong, JinxDuh and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmanNo2 Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 lol. OK chaps... I'm sure it's all protected by NDAs 🙄 woody549, Jez_Armstrong and MistakenMexican 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannonfodder Posted October 24 Share Posted October 24 9 hours ago, ButcherBill said: Let it go. Did the cold never bother you anyway? 8 hours ago, hitmanNo2 said: Yes, the source could be not being named because they asked. BUT WHY? IMO that's irrelevant. If Jez's source has asked not to be named then it's only right that he honours that. JinxDuh and ButcherBill 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JinxDuh Posted October 24 Share Posted October 24 With this information, how long until TM Glocks start being listed on usedairsoft for triple the normal cost because they’re “rare” 🤔 Cannonfodder 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.gif.c9becc9e80e8b91706ea684ec6e23c92.gif)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now