i painted my first two-tone airsoft gun black immediately after researching the VCRA, asking lots of questions, even phoning my local police-station, and comming to the following conclusions;
- Converting an immitation firearm into a realistic immitation firearm is listed in the VCRA as being illegal, like owning one at all, unless you have a valid defence that excempts you from this law.
- 51% bright paint coverage is a defined standard for the difference between 'realistic' or not.
- The only generally accepted 'defences' are that you can prove it is for use in airsoft, re-enactment or film use, rather than robbing banks etc. Even then it's case by case and there's no defined legal standard for prooving such a defence.
- UKARA is a retailers standard for proving that defence is genuine, but not an actual defence/license itself.
- An excuse only becomes a defence if you can prove it, again the UKARA standard isn't a legal minimum for proving a defence, just a minimum standard accepted by a retailers association for selling you the stuff.
As I was planning on playing airsoft not robbery, I felt i had a valid defence. I could not yet prove this defence to the accepted UKARA standard, but i had proof of going to airsoft sites. I figured UKARA might help me prove my defence if i ever had to in future so i'd still apply for it. But i wasn't very concerned about that as my only chances of having to prove it was if i got stopped by the police with the gun in transit, and that'd only be going to an airsoft site i'd have a confirmed booking at. Or if my house got raided/entered by the police for some other reason.
The copper at my local pig-cage told me on the phone that as long as i wasn't stupid enough to brandish it in public, or within direct sight of the public (my neighbours), then i'd be very unlucky to have to provide a defence, and that if they came across them they'd confiscate the guns on the spot regardless so they could be inspected and then whether i had the relevant 'defence' investigated (always a chance of a policeman being understanding and letting you on your merry way but thats the official-line)
SO in summary i chose to consider myself having a valid defence and little odds of having to prove it, so just painted the gun. Even with UKARA, i and anyone else owning a RIF still have a risk of not being able to sucesfully proove a defence, so it's a personal decision on whether you feel you could proove a defence, and how that likelyhood weighs against the penalty for not being able to proove it.