Wezz Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 Hope all reading this are well. So at the weekend just gone , another Sunday full of interesting events through out a day of CQB airsoft. One thing that did catch my attentions was a conversation we had in regards to Binary Triggers. He was unhappy and questioning why the site would not allow someone to run a binary trigger but allow HPA. We explained 1 round per trigger pull. What is everyone's view on binary triggers, DSG or extremely fast ROF HPA set ups? When is a RoF too high for a site? Should there be a line drawn as to the max ROF allowed in a site? If some sites have these rules or something similar, please say as i haven't come across them before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DrAlexanderTobacco Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 I feel like you've answered your own answer in a sense - ROF limits are king. What good is it quibbling over binary triggers, DSG, HPA etc. if you're not considering the core problem they can introduce? Set a ROF limit, then let people do whatever they want within those limits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badgerlicious Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 To me, a binary trigger isn't so much a problem with rate of fire as it is an attempt to skirt around semi only limitations. Granted, there's a bit more control on a binary trigger over full auto, as you still need to do an action for each BB fired, but it seems easy for your reflex to be to double tap the trigger, and fire 4 bbs in no time, effectively being a short burst of full auto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supporters Adolf Hamster Posted October 7, 2020 Supporters Share Posted October 7, 2020 the problem is that a binary trigger effectively doubles your rate of fire. regardless of wether or not it's a titan'd dsg wanker gun build of an hpa hose, in semi you can only acheive so many presses per second. problem is, these guns can often cycle much much faster than the players ability to pull the trigger meaning the human element is the cap on the effective rate of fire. you put a binary trigger in the mix and you've not only doubled the rate of fire but also made it impossible to fire just 1 round. in both the real steel and airsoft world a binary trigger's sole purpose is to creatively skirt rules about fully automatic fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cromulon1994 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 If it sounds like full auto, then it is against the spirit of the rules. In our game based on honour. And full auto being the full auto of an average hire gun, ie a JG G36 on a 7.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supporters Rogerborg Posted October 7, 2020 Supporters Share Posted October 7, 2020 I have no problem with how fast a toy gnu can shoot, as long as the finger on the trigger is keeping it down to a reasonable rate. However, a binary trigger in practice is going to act like a 2 round burst. Once game-on is shouted, nobody is really going to be doing separate pulls and releases: they're going to tap their (no doubt hair) trigger and get 2 shots in quick succession. If you allow 2 round bursts, no problem. If you don't, then you shouldn't allow binary triggers either. Personally I'm getting a bit more blasé about this. Tri-shot shotguns exist, and I wouldn't have a problem with someone putting a 2 or 3 round burst or a binary trigger pull-and-release into me, even at point blank. It's just another 1 or 2 ouchies in a game of ouch. What matters is a pause between those groups for the target to react, rather than hosing them down speedQBsoft style until they curl up into a ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skara Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Pussies. Binary trigger is love ❤️ But yeah, it's the person behind the trigger, not the gun. You can still be a wanker with a 13rps rental G36.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wo1f Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 It’s a wankers tool. Semi is semi, and you can fire virtually any airsoft gun more than quick enough in semi. With a binary trigger you’re firing a minimum of 2 rounds. So can I use a KWA vector 2 round burst? If I can use that why can’t I use a we mp5 with 3 round burst? you only need one BB to hit someone to ‘kill’ them. If you miss with 50 you’ve wasted 50 and you’re shit. If you hit with all fifty then you’re a cunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skara Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 I'm just leaving this here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alxndrhll Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 It’s the nature of anything that’s remotely competitive, folks want to push for an advantage and generally speaking that doesn’t bother me at all. I’m very much a ‘you do you’ kind of person, and personally feel (not limited to airsoft) that we spend far too much time scrutinising what other people do. With that said, binary triggers are one of the very few things I’m not a huge fan of purely down to the reduction in control the user has. I agree with the general sentiment that the RIF isn’t so much the problem as the person using it, but irrelevant of whether you’re a wanker or not if you have a binary trigger it’s firing 2 shots every time you pull the trigger in semi. I turn up to a game in the knowledge I’m going to get shot at, the difference between getting nailed by a single BB versus a handful is negligible for me and I like to think there is never any malice when folks ‘over shoot’. The point that folks have less control over the quantity of BBs leaving their RIF is the point I get less comfortable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supporters Sitting Duck Posted October 8, 2020 Supporters Share Posted October 8, 2020 That TSG he has been kicking the idea around for yonks You got 30 teeth to play with... "You mean 32 as in 16 teeth plus 16 again..." NO the 16 teeth are actually like a clock face Eg 7 teeth appear from 12 to 1 to 6 But if you split the face you get half 12 & half 6 So you get 1/2, then 5 then 1/2 again = 6 Same as sector - half way is actually 1/2 then 14 them 1/2 again = 15 But they round it up on the teeth and cast 16 actual teeth (and the space AREA is 14 teeth, though it is a actually 15 as 16 teeth cast, is using 15 in reality teeth tip to tip) ANYWAY - 30 so-called teeth to play with or cast... So the spacing on sector allows for 30 teeth to be cast on a reg DSG you have 8 teeth and 7 space on a special DSG you can have 9 and 6 space (so timings are more critical for tappet) On the TSG you are left with 5 teeth & 5 space Which is more time pro rata than other sectors to piston teeth So it is feasible to do but still only leaves a timing of 5 teeth/space to feed/chamber a BB - which is very tiny Even the 9 tooth DSG has a space of 6 and can be tricky And the TSG would have around 17% less time to feed (no matter what speed the rof is) So the issue has always been the tappet cycling The lockdown has obviously given him some time So I presume he 3d printed a few Then cast it to make a few prototypes in metal to play with (likely without 3 COL cams yet, just get it working full auto Like a crappy G&G DSG in HC05 I expect) Get those cams sorted at a later date As said the space area for cycling the tappet/feeding is going to be the biggest issue which I think may prove beyond the reasonable limit to work OK Which in that case, the 5 teeth may end up get SS a tooth So that it is 4 teeth and 6 teeth spacing - which might work better SS the TSG to 4 teeth/6 space places it in the timings of a 9t DSG With 9 teeth and 6 space to chamber With just 4 teeth to provide power it is going to limit the options as the power will likely be about 30-33% of springs power And cylinder volume would be fuck all maybe a 110-140mm barrel tops So power expect 200-250fps tops with spacers and a bitch to install a m200 with spacers etc... So it has a limited viability in real terms the general concenus was BUT taking nothing away from Makeii, I admire him even more now For actually giving it a go and taking his original idea further Congrats to him, I'm sure it will work - but it will be limited as the boundaries or limits of an AEG are being stretched to fuck But hey with all this free time, why not give it a go But firmly believe a QSG is not going appear as the TSG is really pushing the limits to fuck on present boxes The timings & final power limits means it will be very tricky to perfect and limit its use in but the smallest barrels at quite low final FPS (in relation to spring power) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supporters Sitting Duck Posted October 8, 2020 Supporters Share Posted October 8, 2020 Following on to original topic... Binary triggers are one thing... 3rd burst bells n whistles etc... are alright But it is all down to the approach It isn't called a wanker gun due to the performance it is coz it is often used by WANKERS being real WANKERS GREAT have a fast ultra snappy gun but control it, use it wisely that hose other players Don't rely on spraying anything that moves to compensate for your lack of skill Try not to be a dick, arguing it is on semi But then spam the fuck out of a binary trigger Like some highly aroused lesbian bring herself off... BUT IT IS ON SEMI - frigg frigg frigg frigg frigg Stop being a wanker, or in friggin binary triggers Stop being a dyke having a wank... Remember wankers & dykes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.