Rogerborg

What does it shoot on the ammo that you actually use? I ask because there's a (small but non zero) chance that if it's shooting at 2.32J on 0.2g then it may be capable of over 2.5J with heavier ammo, i.e. not actually an airsoft gun.

BUMP from beyond the grave. I should have said, I did actually did finally receive a replacement Lighter-S, which worked every bit as well as the first one. As in... Yup, the replacement is now doing the same. It's also erratically shorting on one side, so the LEDs either don't come on, or stay on solid, and I can feel the circuitry heating up. Gentle touches on the circuitry turn the LEDs on and off, so I reckon it's just mis-soldered somewhere rather than component failure. I can't spot the problem beyond some solder-spatter which I've gently removed with a plastic spudger. Surprise, surprise, ex-Workmate Eddie's replacement unit is also doing the same. However... And a soft brush scrubbing has ameliorated the issue, for now. They are fragile though, and I won't be buying another or recommending them, especially now that spitfire units can be had for £40 delivered from AliExpress.

N is for Nuclear. N is for Nuprol.

You can indeed. For a typical skirmish day, anything beyond that is just for dress-up purposes, and doesn't "work" any better. Except for not feeling hits.

Sorry to hear about your awful experience, and thanks for sharing. I currently charge in a cheapo bag while supervising, and with an eye on the back door and a powder extinguisher (which will likely do sod all to a lithium fire). But I hereby commit to upgrading to an Explosion Containment Pie Dish.

This is pretty common, but it's a very welcoming environment. We had a thread on this a while back with a really great post covering what to expect in some detail, which can help with social anxiety. So many hugs in that thread. Your fitness / fatness level is neither here nor there. If you can walk, you can play. Heck, folk play in wheelchairs. What I would note is that a couple of hours of actual action every fortnight isn't really going to do much for your health, but it will give you something to train for if you're that way inclined.

Oh! That's a 50 degree, it would be fine for a GBB pistol, but I'd suggest a 70 or 75 for a sniper rifle.

Wow, that's a weird one. I mean, he has actually modified it rather than just chucking a bucking in, but he's ended up with a gun that's too weak for woodland, and too auto for CQB. However, I think my favourite bit is posting a video of a different gun.

And is an actual game based on tactics rather than who can buy the most £30 figures made of pure cheesium. From what I can determine from the 40K groups on Facebook, it's more about the collecting, painting and army building rather than the actual play.

They show massive ranges because sniper YouTubers tend to be selling a story rather than documenting reality. That's why they have no problem with adding fake hit makers and producing "OMG CHEETAR" clickbait. That said, your Well is definitely underperforming, and I'd agree that the air seal is stuffed. You don't want to be running it on an M170, it'll be doing your sears no favours.

Fun times (I used to have a goblin army back in the day too) but again illustrates the trick rules and wild randomness baked into so many GW products. I mean, there's nothing wrong with that as long as you don't take it too seriously. But with the prices they charge, and actual prize tournaments, it might be hard not to these days. Oh, I went to the local neckbeard club, it was fairly varied. I'm keeping that in the back pocket as a winter alternative to airsoft.

Ex-Workmate Eddy has been rocking a CM16 for years, and I don't think he's done anything more than charge the battery, but it just keeps going. He dialled the stock hop in once for 0.25g, and likely hasn't touched it since. I mean, I can point at all the extra "features" on my "upgraded" Specna Arms, but at the end of the day (and at the start and middle too), his G&G puts BBs downrange pretty much as well. You can change the barrel, hop, rubber, motor and electrics, but you don't actually have to.

Huh, must be one of those new smartguns that the kids are into these days.

Oh, sorry to hear that. Airsoft guns can be phenomenally fragile, it only takes any one of many tiny pieces being fractionally off to ruin your day. My sniper just barely made it through chrono yesterday before locking up solid, and it was onto backup AEG #1. I wouldn't even show up now without at least 3 usable guns. But it's good to hear that you had a G&G epiphany. Yup, the CMs might be plastic, but it's a robust plastic. They might have dial hops, but they're consistent. There are few surprises in there, and still worth considering even if the likes of Specna Arms and Lancer Tactical list more features.

It can be worth re-asking, as we're capricious, and the accepted wisdom changes over time. iMax B6 chargers used to be the go-tos, now we're into the SkyRC R65 and T100. CYMAs used to be considered robust but very basic budget guns, now they're doing some pretty decent stuff as well. There are no stupid questions, only sardonic answers.

Yes, it is. The thing is, at UK power levels, it's not that big a deal. Even if you're shooting at 1.3 or even higher, you're still not anywhere near the level of what we should be planning for, which is a negligent point blank shot of a 2.3J 0.5g sniper BB into someone's earball. We can now delight @Druid799 by segueing into a rant about how EN 166F glasses shouldn't be allowed on sites.

Long overdue, really. Especially considering how much of Hollywood seems determined to not learn anything about the murder-irons that they hate so much. It's fascinating to watch the very few exceptions on screen, like Adam Baldwin (no relation, 2nd Amendment advocate), or Tricia Helfer (farmgirl, once her strict trigger discipline has been seen, it cannot be unseen). Urgh, the stuff that's coming out now. Filming being halted on the armourer's previous film when she was waving guns around, loading them unsafely, then handing them to an 11 year old kid. And the murder-iron in question being used by the crew to fuck around shooting live rounds, on-set out of hours. Whoever brought those rounds on set should probably be getting the short drop and sudden stop, alongside the armourer.

Mea culpa, I have a habit of doing that. When I'm tempted, I try to think "What would colinjallen do?", then I do the opposite. In this case, I do try to remember that sites are primarily responsible for educating players, and if they only talk in terms of fps, then what else are folk mean to think?

The new issue is sites asking people to let them review video before it's published, because of the profusion of "CHEETAR PUNASHED" Licking Mustard clickbait trash that bigs up (or fakes up) the issue while giving sites a bad name. In practice a site can't prevent you publishing whatever you want, but they don't have to let you play again either if you're more interested in a career as a WuTuber than in helping them identify the problem players.

It's the exact same problem as that which spawned this thread: an ingrained habit of thinking in terms of 0.2g because that's what used to be common in the dawn of airsoft time. The law says nothing about BB mass. It actually says "a missile (of any kind)". The intent is clearly to limit what non-firearm airsoft guns could do in the hands of the malicious, rather than what us law abiding types intend to do with them. The State could drop 0.86g steel BBs in there for testing. We'd gasp in horror and say "you'll ruin the hop and barrel", but that's not a concern for Charlie Chav or the State. On the issue of sites chronoing with 0.2g because it's quick and gives you some estimate of what the gun might be doing with the ammo that's actually in it, well, that's true enough. It would be equally quick to use 0.4g though, and it would be more likely to catch hotter guns. It's not a panacea, but if you pick just one mass of BB to use, I'd advocate heavier rather than lighter.

Honestly, I don't blame you. It's up to sites to explain what they mean, and far too many don't bother. They're stuck still thinking in terms of everyone using 0.2g BBs, to the point of not even specifying that, when essentially nobody is using BBs that light in woodland any more. At least they had a Joules figure up there, which is still better than some places. But it makes the fps irrelevant, because what they really mean is 1.14J with whatever ammo you're using, and that happens to be 350fps if you're using 0.2g (but you almost certainly won't be, so it's a pointless number). There's an argument that it's simpler to communicate one big round number than one small one, but it's facile since you have to convert the big number to the small one for it to be any use. Then they'll argue that it's quicker to chrono with site 0.2g BBs (if they bother chronoing, or checking for it), which is great until you see just how much even AEGs can Joule creep with heavier ammo. I had a bit of a surprise yesterday when my AEG jumped from 1.1J up to 1.2J just by going from 0.25g to 0.32g with no other changes. Fortunately that was bang on the site limit. And I honestly couldn't tell you what fps it was seeing with either weight, because it's an irrelevant number. You set the chrono to the BB mass, and you look at the Joules figure, done. Alternatively you can use a chart to convert from fps to Joules, but why bother when it's a few presses on the chrono for most common ammo weights? And credit to this site (Area-66), they even announced that if anyone changed BB weight during the day that they should get re-chronoed. That's the way that sites should be thinking and communicating now.

Ahoy and welcome to both. Yes, we're one of the holdouts from Facebook. I'm still keeping an eye on it, because of sites insisting on using it for communication and organisation. There are also some UK airsoft groups but I'm questioning why I'm even in them, as they're mostly "Wat am best gnu?" posts (where everyone replies with their most recent purchase, irrespective of any criteria given), or worse, "Halp gnu no wurk", where you get drip-fed the actual problem one painful leading question and reply at a time. You will see the occasional "Read the stickies" reply here, but it's generally good natured and constructive.

This is the chap who was asking, in essence, whether he'd get caught if he tried to smuggle RIFs through the Chunnel. He's a wrong 'un.

I'd say primarily. Why not? Is a question that a prosecutor might be asking very soon. Actors have hours of idle time. I can't think of any good reason to not train them, beyond them not wanting to learn anything about icky, scary guns. I understand that you're correct that they're not given sufficient training. What I'm saying is that this needn't be so, and that it might have to change because of this incident. Safety regulations are written in blood. Hot young mother blood in this case. We'll see. I guess it comes down to whether you consider actors to be adult human beings with self agency. What I am 100% confident about predicting is that Baldwin will turn this into an anti-gun crusade. "See, even your botoxed gods aren't safe with murder-irons, so nobody should get to have murder irons. Except actors, of course, because you can trust us now."