Kha0s Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 Hi! Apologies if this has been answered previously, but I've had a look through a bunch of threads, read the classifieds banner, done some google searches and had a look through some of the legislation, but couldn't find a definitive answer. My understanding is that anyone selling airsoft weapons is personally responsible for verifying that whoever they are selling to has a VCRA defense, whether that be through UKARA registration or otherwise. I just wanted some guidance on how people generally achieve this? From what I gather, it's not possible to search the UKARA database as an individual - only registered retailers have access. Do I need to ask for details of where people regularly play and then verify that with the site operators? Could I be held liable for just accepting a UKARA registration number from someone if I don't have any way to confirm if it's valid? Rogerborg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supporters Popular Post Adolf Hamster Posted May 23 Supporters Popular Post Share Posted May 23 everyone kinda has their own standard. what i typically would have done was asked for ukara, then seen if the site code exists on the ukara site listing. if i'm feeling a little sus i at least see if it's in the same general region (eg a mainlander isn't giving me an ni site code). otherwise i just slap the number on the box and call it good. i've also had folk give me re-enactor id (afaik re-enactor id is only good for relevant pews, ie you can't sell an m4 to a ww2 re-enactor, although in my case that didn't apply), and once dispatched a pew via a local shop we both knew. in buying i have had folk either not ask or even accept my forum presence as a player, although ironically my forum presence would now be a tad deceiving as i'm not playing these days. end of the day the requirement is that you're satisfied the person your selling your gun-shaped-object to is going to use it for airsoft pewing or other permitted activity, and afaik there isn't any real definition/precedent as to how much effort needs to be put into verification. Tackle, Galvatron, Kha0s and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommikka Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 You are correct that it is the seller who is legally liable under the VCRA with regard to a defence for a RIF sale But this does not mean that you must explicitly verify against the UKARA or other scheme, there have been verification services, but probably due to a combination of cost, resources and ensuring confidentiality there isn’t a UKARA public/self validation service (A secure process that doesn’t over expose content would be GDPR compliant as the purpose is validation - but there could still be a consent issue on public validation rather than controlled access etc - and retailer members of the UKARA may also prefer that there isn’t a public option) You just need to apply some common sense due diligence, which is also likely to minimise you getting to the point of needing to back up your decision to sell Does the buyer act old enough to buy an airsoft gun (RIF or IF) and for RIFs do they appear to be buying for a valid use? Be extra cautious in the school holidays, if on this forum do they have a posting history (don’t sell a RIF to me because I don’t play airsoft and have said so many times - therefore my forum membership content is evidence of my lack of valid purpose) You can ask, and their member site may also be happy with validating them PS if they tell you they have JustCos membership then refuse the sale Kha0s, ak2m4 and Tackle 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ak2m4 Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 57 minutes ago, Tommikka said: (A secure process that doesn’t over expose content would be GDPR compliant as the purpose is validation - but there could still be a consent issue on public validation rather than controlled access etc - and retailer members of the UKARA may also prefer that there isn’t a public option) Yep went down that road, had a nice prototype system knocked up but based on feedback security / gdpr was a big concern and increasing cost to the project. I agree it's not in the interest of the controlling members of UKARA to encourage sales of 2nd hand rifs. Tommikka, Kha0s and Rogerborg 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannonfodder Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 I've heard some people ask a local shop to check the ukara database. Alternatively if the sale is through here have a look at the 'how did your airsoft day go' thread, if they've posted there then there's a high chance they're a player. The loadout pictures thread is also a good place to check as pictures there are often taken in game. In general trust your gut and treat all sales like a packet of meat that's been in the fridge for a while. If it smells even slightly funky don't bother Tommikka, Kha0s and Tackle 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supporters Rogerborg Posted May 23 Supporters Share Posted May 23 2 hours ago, Kha0s said: Do I need to ask for details of where people regularly play and then verify that with the site operators? Good, in principle. But also in principle, they shouldn't be telling you without getting into an affirmative-ongoing-consent three-way with the buyer. 2 hours ago, Kha0s said: Could I be held liable for just accepting a UKARA registration number from someone if I don't have any way to confirm if it's valid? You could, and you're right to ask the question and be ready to adduce some form of defence. In practice, if it's moving inside the UK, it's vanishingly unlikely that it'll ever be an issue. I'd be more concerned about the courier losing, stealing, breaking, or crushing it without compensation rather than legal consequences. Tommikka, Tackle and Kha0s 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kha0s Posted May 23 Author Share Posted May 23 Thanks for the advice everyone! Sounds like if I make a genuine effort to check they have some sort of VCRA defence and apply a bit of common sense, that should be sufficient. As some of you have mentioned, it's (hopefully) very unlikely someone is going to be irresponsible with anything I've sold, so chances of me having to prove my innocence in any way is pretty slim! Really appreciate the help 👍 Rogerborg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiantKiwi Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 Land Warrior used to help with checks if you phoned them, don't know if they still do as its been about 5 years since I last did it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaywebbo Posted Friday at 11:19 Share Posted Friday at 11:19 UKARA are ONLY needed by shops. If buying or selling a rif privately they are NOT NEEDED. A UKARA OR DEFENCE is only to cover the SHOP'S back simples. At the end of the day it is NOT ILLEGAL to own a rif it's only illegal for a shop to sell one without a UKARA. Cannonfodder and Rogerborg 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Tackle Posted Friday at 12:00 Moderators Share Posted Friday at 12:00 47 minutes ago, jaywebbo said: it's only illegal for a shop to sell one without a UKARA. Not technically correct, shops, like any seller, are required to be satisfied the buyer has a defence according to the vcra, obviously for shops ukara is the easiest, but not the only "paper" defence, some legitimate, some slightly shady. When it comes to private sales, some sellers are adamant they'll only accept ukara, but ultimately it's about convincing a seller that you're a legitimate player, something I've been able to do even though I haven't had ukara for more than a decade. That is of course on the rare occasion a sellers asks for proof of a defence, most just want to see the colour of your money 😏 Rogerborg, Galvatron, Tommikka and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supporters Popular Post Rogerborg Posted Friday at 14:05 Supporters Popular Post Share Posted Friday at 14:05 2 hours ago, jaywebbo said: UKARA are ONLY needed by shops. If buying or selling a rif privately they are NOT NEEDED. A UKARA OR DEFENCE is only to cover the SHOP'S back simples. At the end of the day it is NOT ILLEGAL to own a rif it's only illegal for a shop to sell one without a UKARA. Nobody said it was illegal to buy, or to own, a RIF. It's an offence to sell, to import (or cause to be imported), or to manufacture a RIF, or to modify an IF into a RIF. The same offence applies to everyone. The same defences apply to everyone. In practice it's simply not enforced on anyone, retail or private, anywhere except at point of entry to the UK. But this isn't Facebook or Reddit where confidence and VOLUME hold sway. In the law section here, we cite and discuss statutes, regulations and case law. Cannonfodder, Tommikka, Tackle and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannonfodder Posted Friday at 16:02 Share Posted Friday at 16:02 4 hours ago, jaywebbo said: UKARA are ONLY needed by shops. If buying or selling a rif privately they are NOT NEEDED. A UKARA OR DEFENCE is only to cover the SHOP'S back simples. At the end of the day it is NOT ILLEGAL to own a rif it's only illegal for a shop to sell one without a UKARA. So confident and yet so wrong. Private sales are subject to the same laws as shops, whether or not private sellers are as strict as shops is a different matter. You're right that a defence isn't needed for ownership but that's not what we're discussing here. UKARA isn't the only defence and nor is it a legal requirement. A seller just has go be satisfied that the buyer is using it to play airsoft hence why on site shops can sell to players without a site membership. If the vcra was a person it would be old enough to drink in pubs and vote. How are people still getting this wrong? Tackle, ak2m4 and Galvatron 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Lord_Poncho Posted Friday at 16:43 Share Posted Friday at 16:43 40 minutes ago, Cannonfodder said: If the vcra was a person it would be old enough to drink in pubs Bet he'd be sh*t company though. Absolute zero banter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galvatron Posted Friday at 19:32 Share Posted Friday at 19:32 6 hours ago, jaywebbo said: UKARA are ONLY needed by shops. If buying or selling a rif privately they are NOT NEEDED. A UKARA OR DEFENCE is only to cover the SHOP'S back simples. At the end of the day it is NOT ILLEGAL to own a rif it's only illegal for a shop to sell one without a UKARA. From recent experience, that claim about selling/buying is inaccurate. With the boot sales at Shift Your RIFTs, the organisers said in no uncertain terms that private sellers have a responsibility to ensure that buyers have a valid defence to buy a RIF as the event was open to any Tom, Dick or Harry who may have sinister intentions and not just regular airsofters or novices looking to play on a regular basis. As Tackle & Rogerborg said, while checking a defence with private sales is in the minority of cases in practice and it's seldom enforced at a retail or private level when the RIF is already in the UK, shouting about your claims doesn't make them correct. The litmus test of your claim is that if enforcement of defence checking happened overnight, you'd find a lot of private sellers could be prosecuted no matter how much you shout that a defence is "not needed". Tackle 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommikka Posted Friday at 20:13 Share Posted Friday at 20:13 8 hours ago, jaywebbo said: UKARA are ONLY needed by shops. If buying or selling a rif privately they are NOT NEEDED. A UKARA OR DEFENCE is only to cover the SHOP'S back simples. At the end of the day it is NOT ILLEGAL to own a rif it's only illegal for a shop to sell one without a UKARA. Do tell us which section of the VCRA states that it applies to ‘shops’ only https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/38/section/36 A defence does cover the shops back - it covers the shop against prosecution. You are correct that possession is not an offence under the VCRA. But a private sale is not possession but the transfer of the possessed item in exchange of monetary consideration, AKA sale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now