CJames Posted April 14, 2018 Author Posted April 14, 2018 Just now, xaphor said: The way I used to do this was (sit/stand inside the house aiming at the target. So then nobody really see's anything. ahh. Okay Thank you for the advice.
Loki7491 Posted April 15, 2018 Posted April 15, 2018 14 hours ago, Rogerborg said: Which act, which section? you are correct, It wasn't is the Firearms act... I was mistaken. It is in the Guidance On Firearms Licencing https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/518193/Guidance_on_Firearms_Licensing_Law_April_2016_v20.pdf
Supporters Druid799 Posted April 19, 2018 Supporters Posted April 19, 2018 On 14/04/2018 at 5:52 PM, CJames said: Thanks, sorry for my grammar. Why ? What’s she done ?
grim reaper Posted November 7, 2021 Posted November 7, 2021 iv got the Milbro M16 pellet and the MP5k airsoft and both look very very real and know full well that if anyone reports me with the MP5 and the police get me theres every chance im getting shot. its crazy how its leagal as its the exact replica hahaha
Tommikka Posted November 7, 2021 Posted November 7, 2021 17 minutes ago, grim reaper said: iv got the Milbro M16 pellet and the MP5k airsoft and both look very very real and know full well that if anyone reports me with the MP5 and the police get me theres every chance im getting shot. its crazy how its leagal as its the exact replica hahaha Both are legal, neither are replicas The Milbro is a firearm in its own right - it’s a low power air weapon, though it does also look like a ‘proper’ firearm Your airsoft MP5 is also legal. But for its sale there are legal implications of valid VCRA defences for the ‘need’ to have a realistic one (RIF) as opposed to an IF It may or may not be legal to fire either of them within the boundaries of your garden, depending on specific surroundings (eg how close you are to a public highway, and whether anything escapes your boundary There is not ‘every chancel’ of you getting shot based on their looks. It would depend on whether or not you put yourself in a situation of being observed with them in an inappropriate manner to end up with the police involved, and how you act at the time
Supporters Rogerborg Posted November 7, 2021 Supporters Posted November 7, 2021 2 hours ago, Tommikka said: neither are replicas The Milbro is a firearm in its own right Is this the time when we find case law which says that the same object can't be both? Because I remain utterly baffled by the belief that the State won't apply both laws, as it suits.
Tommikka Posted November 8, 2021 Posted November 8, 2021 9 hours ago, Rogerborg said: Is this the time when we find case law which says that the same object can't be both? Because I remain utterly baffled by the belief that the State won't apply both laws, as it suits. We shall continue to agree to disagree until there is case law I do however have the Home Office statement on Magfed paintball guns - that by being a low power air weapon renders them a firearm and excludes from being an Imitation or Realistic Imitation - they of course qualify that as their interpretation at that time until subject to being tested in court. This does contradict the Association of Chief Constables earlier fact finding visit to a magfed paintball retailer some years before where their interpretation was that everything in stock could be a RIF (including the non magfed classic A5s etc) I’ll say that Home Office guidance being newer and higher up the food chain trumps the Chief Constables, but all of them acknowledge that a court would carry the clout - and it’s clear that interpretation can be from the point of view of the individual concerned along with their fine comb crawling of the legislation I’m very happy to continue to disagree without a case proving either way https://m.facebook.com/UKPSF/posts/532643633518379 https://p8ntballer-forums.com/threads/paintball-and-the-law.171875/post-1560782
Supporters Rogerborg Posted November 8, 2021 Supporters Posted November 8, 2021 It's going to be a sad day when we finally do get precedent-setting case law on this, the mystery is half the fun.
EDcase Posted November 8, 2021 Posted November 8, 2021 It will of course depend on the circumstances of the case so any ruling will not be definitive.
Supporters Rogerborg Posted November 8, 2021 Supporters Posted November 8, 2021 On 08/11/2021 at 11:12, EDcase said: It will of course depend on the circumstances of the case so any ruling will not be definitive. The issue of whether the same object can be both a firearm (e.g. airgun or over-powered airsoft gun) and a realistic firearm should be unambiguous enough. It won't be precedent setting at a Magistrates' court, only at Crown, but even Magistrates' verdicts can be persuasive. Nobody ever did take a punt at guessing which of these (if any) is a real firearm; which (if any) is an airgun firearm clearly designed to be a realistic imitation of that real firearm which can be legally bought over the counter with ID (or at a car boot with none) and no further questions asked; and which (if any) is a realistic imitation firearm which it is an offence to sell even though it's not a firearm and much less lethal than the other two. One really cute quirk is that the RIF (if any) could be claimed to be an imitation of either the real firearm that the airgun is imitating, or of the airgun, with the exact same offence being committed by sale, even though the legality of the two visually identical things that it could be imitating are completely different.
Groot Posted November 11, 2021 Posted November 11, 2021 Set your range up at the end of the garden and shoot from the kitchen.
MadMole Posted November 11, 2021 Posted November 11, 2021 I informed the neighbours on both sides long ago what my hobby was, the response in both cases resulted in them coming over and having a go with their kids. When the kids are older I will take them for a skirmish I tend to shoot from inside the back room, out the patio doors, it adds 5metres to the range, and keeps the sound outside down and also means I'm not in view from further away neighbours or long range camera on police helicopters etc S
AirSniper Posted November 13, 2021 Posted November 13, 2021 It is not illegal to go back yard plinking. You do however, need to go around all your neighbours and explain what it is that they may hear or see and that its a piece of sports equipment that looks like a rifle. ALWAYS shoot towards YOUR PROPERTY so that any damage is yours to fix at your leisure. Your BB's must not have a path to or enter in to the public spaces outside your backyard space as it becomes a big legal issue if you were to hit someone or something and it got damaged ands you were seen,etc, then things get a bit legal. I wouldn't refer to it as target practice either, that implies something else, plinking is the proper term to use and I'd buy a few plinking toys to target practice with and a few catch boxes to catch your BB's in or you can make one easily, just pack it with old paper and bubble wrap and it be atleast 6 inches thick and the BB's won't go through the box, I use both a cardboard box and a couple of catch boxes for indoor practice. If you go indoors, wear eye pros because BB's can come back at you with some force. I'd also arm yourself with a copy of the relevant legislation as you never know, there may be that one or two neighbours that will disagree with you on the law and because they are closed minded and see everything as violence, will report you each time you are out, let them, that can be deemed as harassment to you for going about a hobby you are legally allowed to do on your own property in your back garden (the assumption that its all closed in) but note, if your garden is not enclosed by high fences, you won't be able to do any plinking until you put in higher fencing.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.