Tommikka

Not quite the same, but I did something similar, asking for roughly the new price I had paid, but I had paid a much reduced sponsor / supported price It was genuinely hardly used due to the size of my armoury, and a specific limited edition colour/design and bagged in the original case that only came with a short original run. Not that any value is added, but it had only been serviced by the manufacturer tech guy, and maintained by our certified team tech guy There may have only been two in the country, and it’s the only one I had seen in the country (I say two because my team mate had put his name down for that colour version before we were offered a team deal, but couldn’t wait and took a standard - his may have sat on the shelf or I might have actually ended up with the one earmarked for him) I decided to sell due to the value and lack of use - I had used it once and loaned it out 2 or 3 times. However I wasn’t going to let it go cheaply as I didn’t need the money, otherwise I may as well hang on That meant I was in the situation of asking for X but getting low ball offers, I was open to offer but not willing to drop heavily I’d get low offers telling me that just because it’s a limited colour doesn’t mean it’s worth more (OK then - buy one of the many standard ones available), or that the colour was a little more widely available in the US (OK, go and import one then), also that there was a small rub on the barrel (OK, don’t buy it) and finally that a UK retailer was listing one from new (OK, try buying that one at full retail price - a few hundred £ more than me - until you get to the cart to be told it’s out of stock) It did take me something like a year to sell, during which time I got a couple of ‘one last time’ games with it ….. and sold it on eBay (breaching rules) at an acceptable offer and during a promotional fees discount selling a £1400 - £1500 retail gun, (I had paid nowhere near that - probably trade price) for about £50 to £100 less than I had paid and obtained some use from it, and it sold to somebody who appreciated the mainly visual limited edition elements A private sale can happily be made between two people for an agreed price, that one is willing to part for and the other is willing to pay As long as one isn’t purely ripping off newbies with exaggeration then it should be fine

Limited edition custom

This is a hobby that needs multiple people to match their leisure time, and sites open accordingly - primarily as a weekend hobby This does mean that the typical site isn’t used to its optimum at 2/7ths of time, but the customer isn’t around 7 days a week Some things can be run more if there is a customer base - but you could then be looking at the ‘experience’ area of the market and venues that can be diverse in their activities The alternative to finding an existing weekday site is to do what someone probably did in the first place at those that do have a weekday opening - gather the regulars and establish that it’s viable to open during the week This doesn’t help the lone player looking for a game that suits their free time, but it doesn’t hurt to ask local sites if they have already had some interest, or to play when you do get a weekend off and ask the regulars Sometimes it’s initiated by Marshalls to get a midweek evening as they work the site at the weekend

Ferrero Rocher works with the Foreign & Commonwealth office (Ambassador, you are spoiling us) For Border Force it’s Toblerone - there’s a clue in the duty free shop

A claim involves relevant documentation - in the case of a sale the transaction qualifies as a receipt. I have not claimed for a RIF but I have claimed for eBay and Vinted sales, Vinted wouldn’t be too applicable here as that usually includes Vinteds contracted carriers (and is passes over to Vinted to resolve in the ‘lost’ timeframe) but when Royal Mail is selected the seller deals with Royal Mail I have managed to successfully claim value based on a screenshot of the transaction payment - of course up to the insured limit. A private transaction should of course be paid via a suitable method (PayPal etc) and not tagged as friends & family money owed etc

IP banning is very difficult, and very easily blocks valid users. Ive not gone into many VPNs recently, but in my experience the most basic VPNs allocate a random IP - and unless you keep the VPN enabled will get a fresh one next time I occasionally use the free version of a VPN and when switching on I get a random VPN in a random country, if I want a specific country I have to select, but still get a random fresh IP every time IPs are very rarely fixed, and those are left for specific services. Users IPs are leased from the IP server - you get a maximum period of usage, and at any time a fresh log in can get reallocated When I was moderating a forum we had a few options in our processes, and could handle it differently depending on the incoming spam. If they were continuing to send then the big button was hit, IP blocked, user suspended (or deleted), and in addition we had a user report come up with IP country/region, IP range, network provider, user profile, list of posts etc - then decide on the action Speciific IP blocking was pretty pointless, they just reset and were back Region blocking could kill off access from a whole country - and it was a UK based forum, but we had some world users plus some members of the community plus some moderators worked internationally (including a couple in the private aircraft industry) Hard hammer use would block their access - especially against spammers that used public WiFi / Internet cafe providers IP blocking is a tool that can be used, but with care and effort to be sure of what you’re blocking

Question 1 is up to the moderators & admins. (I wouldn’t have read it as retrospective on the listing, but you’re right that the rule applies as of tommorow for all sales/swaps - which can be read to mean any live advert) Question 2 - the fuller rule refers to sales/swaps. Therefore no verification picture needed for the wanted listing - but responses offering to fulfil the want would need a verification picture

Go through the points one by one. It’s probably the VCRA skirmisher defence, so check through all the points that they have referenced, reply covering them complete with your UKARA details (check they match the address in case of any changes and/or typos) and be prepared to have it decided in court VCRA Section 36.7 It is a RIF You have a defence with UKARA membership https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/38/section/36 VCRA Section 39.7 Refers to VCRA 39.6 and customs and excise act section 1 39.6 is with regard to the specifications of an IF (Eg If you didn’t have a VCRA RIF defence then you could have import an IF at >50% defined bright colours etc. (perhaps it has been checked to be overpowered for the UK, but the section references IFs) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/38/section/39 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/2/section/1 The other points refer to the various pieces of legislation. You should look them up but the key points will be: 1)VCRA RIF defence - your UKARA membership, plus be prepared to document your intention to continue to play airsoft skirmishing at insured sites 2)IF non compliance - should be covered by your RUF defence 3)Sender may not have correctly declared contents Be prepared to say to the court “Oh dear, that was very silly of them. I’m a responsible player and had intended to conduct a fully legal and open import, giving my UKARA details to the retailer 4)They have sent a non compliant RIF overpowered for the UK (only a guess on potential reasons) If so you’re either screwed or can go for the “It should have been supplied with UK compliant settings which can be arranged via x tech support in the UK

I know I was commenting on your claim that the VCRA would not apply to airsoft guns if section 57a was removed Airsoft guns were low powered air weapons, which were within the Firearms legislations scope

In which case the VCRA didn’t apply to airsoft for the decade of 2007 to 2017 before section 57a was produced, and there was no need for the statutory instrument to add the airsoft skirmisher defence I would have tended to agree as an airgun is a firearm and an airgun that looks like a ‘proper firearm’ couldn’t be both a firearm and an imitation firearm ….. but a case went to court and @Rogerborgwon the argument that we would be on opposing sides of with a gentleman’s agreement to agree to disagree But case law now says otherwise - a firearm can be an imitation firearm Licenced firearms are controlled via the licence and certificate processes Categories of firearms are available by other controls, such as low powered air weapons sold face to face / via RFDs, and other categories aren’t controlled other than self policing good practice by parts of the industry - such as paintball retailers that follow UKPSF recommended guidelines ….. and courtesy of the section 57a exemption a category of what would be low powered air weapons are not subject to controls but the industry has a potential liability under which retailers protect themselves as a collective under the UKARA and other similar schemes (or don’t protect themselves and take risks against personal high fines and loss of good faith in the industry with fake defences

All ‘air weapons’ fall within firearms legislation, and this was the case when the VCRA was put into place and airsoft would at that time have sat in firearms legislation as ‘low power air weapons’ within the 6 and 13 ft lbs limit Subsequently compliant airsoft guns within joule limits have been specifically cleared of being firearms Paintball remains in firearms legislation, and Home Office guidance is being nice to pajntballers - as long as people aren’t dickheads with dodgy imports and/or dodgy projectiles. There are some very grey interpretations, focused on frangibility & lethality - which will (and has) put people in serious trouble with the use of other projectiles To date I am not aware of any issues with the need for RFDs (Except for various ‘issues’ experienced by the original Scottish paintball sites who had major legal problems and firearms prosecutions) The UKPSF keeps on the case to protect (responsible) paintballers and the legislation change on the definitions for airsoft covers airsoft There is always the danger of a politician getting uppity, and that has happened a lot in Scotland - but both airsoft and paintball have been doing well - including since before airsoft was airsoft

Purchased in good faith perhaps - but not compliant with the law due to their construction

The limit is expressed in ‘force’ / energy Low powered air weapons are to be within 12ft lbs for rifles, 6 ft lbs for pistols (16 and 8 joules) The specifics rifle to pistol may not always be what we think, and the specific projectile fired can result in different muzzle velocity & joule creep

He thought that he was posting in the ‘slow questions, simple answers’ thread

Yes. They would be eligible for a VCRA Defence to purchase RIFs, but that wouldn’t really suit their needs, making sense that bright two tones would stand out as trainers