RedWolfDoctor Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Howdy, shooters So, I have a conundrum: my red dot sights. I have some cheap Eotechs, a Theta Optics Monolith red dot sight and a Valken V tactical red dot. The running theme between all of them is that they are all off-centre because of structural flaws that are built into the scopes themselves. When mounted the scopes are either shifted too much to the left or too the right, no matter which way they are mounted. This is getting annoying since it makes zeroing the gun and aiming a chore more than it should be. I guess it serves me right for buying cheap red dots. Anyone know of any brands that are actually properly made so the scope sits on the centre instead of being shifted right or left? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimFromHorsham Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Is it the scopes or the chinesium Picatinny rails on the guns themselves ? Rogerborg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommikka Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 In addition to the common physical factor being your rail, have you also considered the effect of parralex error from your head/eye position? A little ‘adjustment’ can be made to your rail - permanently by filing down an edge or less permanently by slipping in some paper or card on one side to shift the sights relative position when mounting. There isn’t too much that can be done about parralex error, but extra layers of rails or an offset rail can move the sight to what may be a ‘better’ position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supporters Rogerborg Posted September 26 Supporters Share Posted September 26 1 hour ago, Tommikka said: some paper or card Beercan shim is best shim. Lozart and Tommikka 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jefferson2000 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 1 hour ago, Rogerborg said: Beercan shim is best shim. What he said, I've shimmed many real steel sights using this method. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannonfodder Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Just make sure you've got enough empties to finish the job 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedWolfDoctor Posted September 26 Author Share Posted September 26 9 hours ago, JimFromHorsham said: Is it the scopes or the chinesium Picatinny rails on the guns themselves ? Definitely the scopes, the rails line up with the original gun-sights themselves. 8 hours ago, Tommikka said: In addition to the common physical factor being your rail, have you also considered the effect of parralex error from your head/eye position? A little ‘adjustment’ can be made to your rail - permanently by filing down an edge or less permanently by slipping in some paper or card on one side to shift the sights relative position when mounting. There isn’t too much that can be done about parralex error, but extra layers of rails or an offset rail can move the sight to what may be a ‘better’ position I guess parallax problems do occur because when I shoulder it, the reticule changes from "zeroed" to "not-zeroed" depending on the mounting. Sometimes I mount it, discover it works fine, then stare down the sight again to discover it's "off". Already tried an extra rail set, I use a larger mount for the sight to see over a PEQ box. Even with accounting for both, the sight is still off-centre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supporters Lozart Posted September 27 Supporters Share Posted September 27 11 hours ago, RedWolfDoctor said: I guess parallax problems do occur because when I shoulder it, the reticule changes from "zeroed" to "not-zeroed" depending on the mounting. Sometimes I mount it, discover it works fine, then stare down the sight again to discover it's "off". Already tried an extra rail set, I use a larger mount for the sight to see over a PEQ box. Even with accounting for both, the sight is still off-centre. Hang on - are you zeroing the scope off the gun then mounting it and it's no longer central? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannonfodder Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 If you're removing the sight then changing the mounts then you're going to need to rezero the sight. Lozart 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AK47frizzle Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 Cheap brands and optics will have laughable parallax and performance issues, especially the eotechs and other fancy scope types. If you shell out a bit for a vortex crossfire red dot, you'll never need anything else. I have this and a sparc ar and they are both top notch. That being said, I recently went for a vector optics maverick gen 2 which was about £60 on sale at opticswarehouse and my god this thing is quite amazing as well. The parallax effect is pretty much unnoticable when shifting my head, and I've used it for several games days, even on my sniper rifle for fun, and it has held up very well. Would recommend that specific sight, can't vouch for the others. RedWolfDoctor 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedWolfDoctor Posted September 27 Author Share Posted September 27 13 hours ago, Lozart said: Hang on - are you zeroing the scope off the gun then mounting it and it's no longer central? No, I'm zeroing the sight when it's attached to the weapon. 6 hours ago, AK47frizzle said: Cheap brands and optics will have laughable parallax and performance issues, especially the eotechs and other fancy scope types. If you shell out a bit for a vortex crossfire red dot, you'll never need anything else. I have this and a sparc ar and they are both top notch. That being said, I recently went for a vector optics maverick gen 2 which was about £60 on sale at opticswarehouse and my god this thing is quite amazing as well. The parallax effect is pretty much unnoticable when shifting my head, and I've used it for several games days, even on my sniper rifle for fun, and it has held up very well. Would recommend that specific sight, can't vouch for the others. This is more like it, I'll check these out! Thanks for the recommendations! Lozart 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now