Darkmikey22

Looks like a tromix shark.

I would like one but not sure it would fit. The DG kits are designed for a Echo1, this is a Inokatsu. Plus the price of a DG kit I could put a decent amount against a TM AA12

Qlimax, looks the nuts. I must say, that flash hider just looks nicely naughty More of mine, Now have a Tripod and working on getting the original box mag into the ammo tin and running a long tube up.

This is always a two way argument. Yes there are people out there who only add a few parts and call it custom, then try to sell it at a high price. But I have also seen people that have really spent a lot of time and money building absolute beast's, yet get lowballed by people that either don't have a clue what they are buying or want to buy gold with buttons. For example; there was a guy last year on another forum selling an Inokatsu STEEL M240B for £900, which is a bargain when it cost £1600 New and was unskirmished. Yet two lads made a thread about what a rip off this guy was, and that it was overpriced and that you can get the same thing for $300 from the abroad. Well most people know a $300 echo1 to a full steel Inokatsu is a big difference. But my point is; where is the line drawn between an over priced gun, or someone just wanting something for nothing? At the end of the day, as everyone else has said, if your not happy paying that price, give a offer, if not accepted, walk away. It's no biggy is it?

Cheers chap, a couple more....

no problem chap

yea you will have to make an account, but its been a long time since I joined and cant remember the sign up process. I will contact him tomorrow and point him in this direction as he maybe on here too.

if you speak to a guy called GhostofGreen on zeroin he has some spare ones. plus once you do get a new one (or a pair) I would bend the bar ends round a bit more so it holds them in a bit more so there is no chance of it sliding out and losing another one.

Ed, that l85 looks good, just need to get it dirty and rub away some of the edges

See I was actually that sad and scrolled through EVERY page!

If it's the one I'm thinking of, I'm having some issues there too. I'm try to get information regarding L119's Now there are 5 or 6 members on said site that claim they can or have been near a real one etc, pm them for any details. Yet I have pm'd them over the course of several days and only had one answer me!. Yet with the others it shows that they have viewed their pm's too, bloody rude!.

A lid is a lid, its only a bit of kit that maybe a particular unit will use or is issued, but isn't wrong to wear unlike a beret that is earnt.

Tbh there are ways of pulling off a loadout with an eye for detail and a bit of research with out ever having to wear any insignias, ranks or berets and possibly offending people. If you look closely you can identify units sometimes just by the kit they wear. these are only rough outlines for example: If you are doing a typical para dpm loadout use a para helmet instead of a mk6 Afghan loadouts are even easier. Early 2 para wore ddpm trousers and top, mk2 osprey with standard plce webbing over the top plus a para helmet. Early 3 para wore ddpm trousers, ddpm ubacs with ddpm blackhawk plate carrier plus para helmet ( most with choc chip helmet netting). Early royal marines wore ddpm trousers, dpm shirt/jacket with either dpm plce or dpm assault vest Later marines wore ddpm trousers, ddpm ubacs but then dye the ubacs green and wore mk2 osprey. The list goes on but I'm sure you see what I'm getting at. So some people will recognise the load out without the need for patches. Just to clarify I did for 1 photo in the pictures section but was for reference of a loadout, but would never airsoft with them.

went back through mass effect and forgot how good the end credits are. http://youtu.be/gISlB1IdUjI?list=FLpQbvUasU83fA2Kn_aLvKnw

are you still going ahead with this build? If so I maybe able to help as I have a deact Baker rifle I can take photos or measurements for you.

yep mk18. I had a spare upper so fitted the DD rail so now run between mod 0 and mod 1. Personally I still think the mod 0 looks better. there's just something about the A frame sight that I like

yes it is chap, thank you

If your going to leave yours the way it is in the pic (early version) I have seen them either put one number on the top front of the retractable stock or put 2 numbers on. they will be on the side of the lower side of the stock followed by numbers on the back edge of the carry handle. If you swapped the carry handle for a sight, its normally then put on the side of an acog or on top of a eotech. like so.... But in theory its no different than any UK armourer, each regiment will stick them where ever they feel like it. Plus other than the navy seals who stick it on every piece of the weapon you will never see more than two sets of numbers on one weapon. And now a days they no longer put armourer marks and just add a QR sticker on the blank mag well section on the right hand side.

Cheers, I'm using a DDPM PRR pouch

They may have changed since i bought mine. @mack was it the same for you or was the sizing spot on?

Cheers fella. Yeah I'm very proud of her now she's finished. More posing may yet to come as hoping to make an appearance with her a NAE this year.

As far as im aware the Para's did use both.

I found my tmc pcu was ok (ish), they are a very close replica compared to some of the other clones out there that are really bad. But like most clones over time mine started to fray and split under the arms. Also depending on where you get them most are advitised in china sizes, so if your a large order the xl.