mrfoxhound
-
Posts
49 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
0%
mrfoxhound's Achievements
-
mrfoxhound reacted to a post in a topic:
Hard decision
-
mrfoxhound reacted to a post in a topic:
Macks airsoft dreamers of the week thread
-
EvilMonkee reacted to a post in a topic:
Macks airsoft dreamers of the week thread
-
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
-
mrfoxhound reacted to a post in a topic:
Legit tactic or...
-
mrfoxhound reacted to a post in a topic:
Macks airsoft dreamers of the week thread
-
not with that debt
-
mrfoxhound reacted to a post in a topic:
S/H guns at full price plus
-
mrfoxhound reacted to a post in a topic:
Spring M rating in relation to bolt action rifles
-
mrfoxhound reacted to a post in a topic:
Update on Stolen Kit
-
mrfoxhound reacted to a post in a topic:
Update on Stolen Kit
-
mrfoxhound reacted to a post in a topic:
Macks airsoft dreamers of the week thread
-
mrfoxhound reacted to a post in a topic:
Wolf Armouries selling up?
-
i wont be surprised if they start claiming the council has it out for them
-
Rogerborg reacted to a post in a topic:
Site at risk
-
DanBow reacted to a post in a topic:
Site at risk
-
https://www.colchester.gov.uk/info/cbc-article/?catid=latest-news&id=KA-04921
-
Galvatron reacted to a post in a topic:
FAO Precinct 13
-
watch out for the driller killer 😉
-
Pseudotectonic reacted to a post in a topic:
Site at risk
-
some screens the local mp they went to on facebook they ask for help from replyed with this
-
Tackle reacted to a post in a topic:
Site at risk
-
Cannonfodder reacted to a post in a topic:
Site at risk
-
nonono they have been operating for a few years , had maybe 5 sites and have been asked to leave or left the most egress one is as we are a garrison town there's quite a lot of training facility's for the army around small FIBUA with woodlands, they pretty much got airsoft banned from using any training areas because of bad hand over , and are in 81,000 pounds in debt
-
Cannonfodder reacted to a post in a topic:
Site at risk
-
Rogerborg reacted to a post in a topic:
Site at risk
-
one game, there trying to use the 28 day rule to not get planning permission and calming skirmish team game is not a ''war game'' ,which you cant use the 28 day rule if you are doing ''war games''
-
Rogerborg reacted to a post in a topic:
Site at risk
-
thats a direct email they received from the council
-
but they didn't get planning permission in the first place ,
-
your just wrong, you thrown shade three times saying i cant read while intentionally leaving out context, the hit player is walking in a strait line on the left slowly, enemy targets are moving right to left , the guy shooting targets has a blinkered view and cant see the hit player down his 4x scope , on tracking a target right to left he shoots and continues to shoot the hit guy on the left who he couldn't see because of tunnel visioning , the reason he hit him is because of bad trigger discipline, its pretty simple he wrote it out in his post even with a diagram
-
maybe I've just been spoiled with good marshals and sites
-
still not being honest with this , and ive quoted it plenty of times he had a blinkered view and had tunnel vision on his 4x scope could not see the dead player and shot him as he was shooting enemy targets , cant see dead player + (blinkered view) has tunnel vision + has fast moving target = bad trigger discipline ,every time i mention this you 100% leave out him having a blinkered view then throwing shade that i don't understand its childish. also he was moving himself out the way slowly but was moving out the way
-
i agree and understand that's the way it is ,telling the marshal is the proper way to handle it
-
you are purposeful missing out him saying he had a blinkered view , if your not gonna be honest why continue ive also quoted it twice which you have missed
