SBoardley

Ahhh. I think you’re trying to hurt my fleesings, or what ever it is women have... and no, I still think this thread is ‘owned’ by a bunch of toxic back slapping bitches, who think they can say what they want with obvious impunity.

1. The fact that Edcase hasn’t denied that he called out an innocent third party for lying about not selling his fal, thus it not being the £190 rif ‘inflated’ to £x sold by avenger is the point. Not avenger. 2. no one got to buy something they think is too expensive. 3. I’m past caring bruv.

But a lot of us have bought Systemas....now that’s an over priced ¥#%€. But we’ve coughed up the dough! those were the days. .....and on the seventh day, God created the gbbr.... .....and he saw that it was good!

Well he called me toxic less than an hour ago He had the opportunity to deny it shortly afterward.

Edcase Convenient for someone, not implying anything else.

I’m not saying anything about a conspiracy mate. Why would a random person ie myself decide to make up nonsense for the sake of it. Ed knows what he said and conspicuous in his silence.

Yeah looks like that’s what has happened here. silence.....

Dude. I got thick skin. I’m a Stonemason! Just don’t like injustice bud.

Conveniently deleted perhaps. Ed knows what I’m talking about. Was in the question section.

Accusing people of things they haven’t done, dismissing them as inferior and imposing your opinion is bullying.

yeah, think you’ve missed out the bit where the third party chirps in and explains that it wasn’t his being resold, as he’d withdrawn it some time ago. And the bit where mr duck implies that the guy is not telling the truth, and it is in fact the same rif being sold on for more cash.

Yesterday a certain person harangued a guy selling a Fal. He accused the seller of buying it cheap from another guy on this forum, and reselling it at an inflated price. The 3rd party was named as the original seller, and when replied to the accuser, saying it in fact was not the same rif, the accuser just about called him out as not telling the truth. So, essentially, because the truth didn’t suit the duty officer, he saw it fit to slight two people. What right does he have to do this and go unchallenged apart from being a member of the price police clique?

This thread is nothing but toxic bullying. If someone overprices an item, and it doesn’t sell, it’s down to them. Not the ‘price police’ to shame people.

From what I gathered so far, it’s probably due to paperwork for export they now have to complete. I’m presuming that this £135 is a minimum spend, to cover/ justify filling out the paperwork?