• Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.

    The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here

    If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here

Opinions on Bipod Foregrips?

Holly Wallace

Members
Joined
May 1, 2025
Messages
21
Reaction score
12
Hi all,

As in the title, Wondering what you all think about those foregrips with bipods spring loaded into them. 

I've always been running one on my SR47, Since I'm either all in on static position support type of play style, Or running around. It's a stable enough solid bipod, And deploys and retracts quick. The grip itself is pretty monolithic however, And it does occasionally get bumped on trees, Or gets in the way of the whole rock-in mag thing.

Haven't seen any one else using something like this, It's either just a foregrip, Or foregrip and bipod seperate on DMRs. 

View attachment 150062

 
Hi all,

As in the title, Wondering what you all think about those foregrips with bipods spring loaded into them. 

I've always been running one on my SR47, Since I'm either all in on static position support type of play style, Or running around. It's a stable enough solid bipod, And deploys and retracts quick. The grip itself is pretty monolithic however, And it does occasionally get bumped on trees, Or gets in the way of the whole rock-in mag thing.

Haven't seen any one else using something like this, It's either just a foregrip, Or foregrip and bipod seperate on DMRs. 

View attachment 150062
I ran one of these for a while several years ago; I found that it got in the way.

 
Yeah. I'm considering getting a smaller bipod, Problem is just getting one large enough when extended. The 7.62x39 style mags are a little long, And the current grip bipod lets me rest the rifle down upright.

 
Hi all,

As in the title, Wondering what you all think about those foregrips with bipods spring loaded into them. 

I've always been running one on my SR47, Since I'm either all in on static position support type of play style, Or running around. It's a stable enough solid bipod, And deploys and retracts quick. The grip itself is pretty monolithic however, And it does occasionally get bumped on trees, Or gets in the way of the whole rock-in mag thing.

Haven't seen any one else using something like this, It's either just a foregrip, Or foregrip and bipod seperate on DMRs. 

View attachment 150062
They are very flimsy and prone to snapping. At least the 2 I've tried have done that. Not really useful and barely used the bipod function. 

 
The one i have it's 20/80 whether the legs will lock up and it make the gun sit high on the deck. 

 
Getting hold of a real one will make a huge difference. 

The airsoft versions feel nothing like as solid as a real one.

That said, I'm still not a fan for most builds, just a little bit bulky for me. 

 
Used one on my Mk48 once, one of the legs snapped within an hour. Never looked at one again. 

 
Used to use one on my LMG - dual capability is useful but the anirsoft version isn’t that durable, I think I went through about 4 of them in a couple of years

 
I run a couple on my L85's but mainly for the looks, never got in the way or used as an actual bipod but I'm a slowpoke so not likely to get a lot of harsh use. I had one delivered broken so I fully expect them to be weak & prone to damage.

 
These used to be issued with the SA80. Mostly always sacked off to the locker to save weight.....


Tons still in armouries, still used, but fallen out of favour I'd say for sure. I had a search out of my own curiosity, and most pics of A3s don't have them, especially with infantry blokes - who are amongst the small portion of the forces using the L85 but also given some element of leeway in configuring it. In the pics where the grip-pods are mounted, I personally reckon it's mostly because the person was told they had to have it - which I'd say is most UK service people when using TES A2s.

Foregrips in general don't always get along with AKs, which is why there's a few funky ones from ruskie brands that stick out at weird angles, so that's a specific issue in the OP's case and it's exacerbated because foregrips with integrated bi-pods are always the longest/tallest of all types of foregrip.

While the real grip-pods (the GPS design that the US and UK have issued) are 'ok', they're still not the most durable thing which is unavoidable due to the design, so then when you make a replica with typical airsoft materials you usually end up with something very flimsy. I'd wager most people who've ever attached a bi-pod of any kind for a functional purpose vs emulating something real, have ended up taking it off again not long later, since they're usually in the worst place to add weight (near the muzzle) and are no assistance in terms of accuracy with guns that shoot minute-of-barn at their maximum effective range. They have niche uses of course, good if you're going to stay in a spot you can rest the gun for 20+ minutes and just cover one narrow alley, but not a ton else.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Personally i think grip-pods are hideous, so that alone rules them out for me.

Looks aside, I'd rather have a foregrip and bipod seperate, a more comfortable/better-looking foregrip and an adjustable bipod. Bipods might not get used much, but they can be good and we know 95% of airsoft gun exterior mods are for looks anyway.

My two DMRs have both bipods and vertical foregrips, and my 416 workhorse has both too.

 
Cheap airsoft ones are very flimsy.  I used to run what I think where better made but still airsoft ones.  I found them useful on milsim weekend games or resting your gun  when in a building or defensive position. Saves you from putting it down in mud and also keeps it in a semi guns up position, especially if you in prone position lying in ambush.  However they are huge as a vert grip, i prefer the Magpul MVG.

 
Back
Top