Is a defence required for the sale of rif external parts

[emilianoksa]

A week ago I put a Hi Capa Airsoft Masterpiece slide in titanium grey with metal outer barrel and other custom parts in the sales section. I was unsure whether I would need a defence from a buyer, so I asked on Google and got the AI response, which seemed to suggest that it would be better for me to require a defence.

However today I asked the question on Google again but more directly (choosing my words more precisely) and received a different response ie. I would be breaking no law because a part of a rif is not subject to the same restrictions as a complete rif. This is what I have always thought.

Of course somebody without a defence could buy my complete hi capa upper and use it to make a rif, but I have no control over that. As I see it, the offence, if it occured, would be the buyer's not mine. Kyle at Hi Capa Hub sometimes sells complete black factory pistol uppers left over after he has customised guns. Does he require a defence for these complete uppers? If not it would reassure me that I can remove the UKARA requirement from my original advert when I bump it tomorrow.

Your advice would be much appreciated.

 

[Austeyr]

No. The VCRA only applies for Replica Imitation Firearms and not the parts themselves. Much like you don't need a UKARA or other form of valid defence to purchase say a MK16 handguard in black/tan or a defence to purchase a CTR stock.

 

[Punisher3990]

Parts are not subject to the VCRA, as Austeyr has already stated. A slide, outer barrel, complete upper, or other airsoft components are generally treated as parts rather than as a complete realistic imitation firearm. This is why some overseas retailers used to offer "deconstructed RIFS" to help get them through customs, as they were technically just parts and not a full RIF. Customs kinda caught onto this and they are much more strict over this.

If somebody were to use those parts to replace two-tone components and create a black RIF without having a valid defence, then technically the act of manufacturing or converting that RIF would be carried out by the buyer, not the seller. The responsibility would therefore rest with the person assembling or modifying the gun.

UKARA itself is also frequently misunderstood. It is not a legal requirement and it is not a licence to own airsoft guns. It is simply a retailer database used to help verify that a purchaser has a valid defence when buying a new realistic imitation firearm from a retailer.

For second-hand private sales, there is no specific legal requirement to check UKARA membership or obtain proof of a defence. Many sellers choose to ask for a defence or a UKARA number for their own peace of mind, and there is nothing wrong with doing so, but it is a personal choice rather than a legal obligation.

Ultimately, a complete Hi-Capa upper is still a collection of parts rather than a functioning RIF. If a buyer later uses those parts in a way that breaches the legislation, that would be their responsibility rather than the responsibility of the person who sold the parts.

 

[emilianoksa]

Thanks to you both for clearing that up for me.

 

[Tackle]

For second-hand private sales, there is no specific legal requirement to check UKARA membership or obtain proof of a defence. Many sellers choose to ask for a defence or a UKARA number for their own peace of mind, and there is nothing wrong with doing so, but it is a personal choice rather than a legal requirement.

Click to shrink...

Actually not correct, a private seller has the same legal responsibility as a retailer when selling an airsoft rif.
BUT
This still has yet to be tested in a court of law, in order to set a lawful precedent.
Essentially, no one has been nicked or convicted regarding the private sale of an airsoft rif.
Personally I would rather private sellers exercised caution & all due diligence available to them in private sales, should the ever hit the fan in a big way, & the whole process be tested in court, better to be able to show that the seller did their best to ensure everything is legit, because if they couldn't, it could easily spell the end for private sales in the uk, or worse ?

 

[Tommikka]

What @Tackle said

The VCRA does not distinguish between private and retail sales. It either applies or does not, in other words it’s a RIF or is not
The seller is liable for the defence under a RIF sale, and the Airsoft defence is the “skirmisher defence”
It does not specify what an acceptable defence is, so in the highly unlikely case of a private seller ending up in court then be prepared to justify that you were reasonably confident when selling a RIF to an adult with the intention to play Airsoft at an insured site. UKARA is the industry standard but is not specified in law.
Photos of gameplay may be reasonably acceptable, an active poster on this forum may also be acceptable …. But not necessarily as I don’t play Airsoft but do post on this forum

The top tip of asking AI anything is to check the sources, because the current generation of AI answers are generated by LLM large language models trained on the internet, which means you get a random sequence of words generated on a mathematical probability based on text found on the internet. Not something to trust a fine of a few thousand pounds

 

[Punisher3990]

Worth mentioning that my comment was regarding selling parts and not full rifs

Also i have bought 30+ Preowned RIFS and have never been asked for any defense. If its something that people want to happen they need to make it possible for individual sellers to check the database.

 

[BigAl]

Just to add if the parts are a comp!eye gun stripes down that does need a defense Best bet is to sell an upper hand a lower separately.

 

[Tackle]

Worth mentioning that my comment was regarding selling parts and not full rifs

Also i have bought 30+ Preowned RIFS and have never been asked for any defense. If its something that people want to happen they need to make it possible for individual sellers to check the database.

Click to shrink...

There used to be a few friendly retailers, such as firesupport, who would confirm if ukara details supplied to you by a potential buyer were correct & in date.
Some registered site owners would also do this.

 

[Cannonfodder]

I'd say you only need to ask for a defence if you're selling a bundle of parts which could look like a rif when put together.

As an aside I wouldn't trust Google or any other AI tool as they often get things completely wrong

 

[Galvatron]

I have to agree with Tommikka and Cannnonfodder on not blindly relying on AI in a lot of cases. An AI model's sources should be vetted for the most credible output. For all you know, a model could have trawled through a multitude of sources with consensus or majority views and push that as the answer. The problem is that those sources can have a vested interest in pushing disinformation and falsehoods.

In this case, because UKARA isn't a matter of statute but rather a self-regulating system to satisfy the restrictions imposed by the VCRA, AI is prone to give inconsistent and misleading information because there isn't an explicit law for UKARA.

I've seen LLMs get things wrong with how you get your UKARA defence because I've seen it say you need to play 3 games without pointing out the 56-day gap between the first and third game. I've seen them say you have to play 3 games then allow 56 days between the first and second games then 56 days between the second and third. I've also see them say you have to play at the same physical location for your 3 games because the language model took "site" as the location, not as the airsoft company itself.

 

[Lyndication]

Most LLMs have been trained by functionally dumping Reddit and Twitter into them. As a result, they struggle with factuality because their output is designed to give you the most likely answer you'd read in those spaces. It's the difference between parroting r/Airsoft or having your own experience and understanding. LLMs fundamentally can't ever have actual experience to base their outputs on.

You can also get different answers to the same question each time, based on minor variations in wording, as you've found. A human would infer the underlying intent in your questions and answer the question they think you're asking. An LLM answers like a statistically median Redditor, except they filter the part where they call you a cuck for not owning NODS.

 

[Punisher3990]

I also find that AI tends to pander to whoever is writing the prompt. I use it a lot for various work-related tasks, mainly GPT, and it often tries to give the answer it thinks I want to hear.

It's incredibly impressive from a technological standpoint, but it can also be a weakness. Once you've provided certain information or established a particular viewpoint, it may continue to frame future responses around that context, even when you're asking it to look at something from a different perspective.

I also use it alot for airsoft stuff, for example, I wanted to see what one of pistols rifs would look like in black, added a picture and told it to make it black and it did, very impressive but still has alot of flaws like you say,

 

[Tackle]

I think

 

[Punisher3990]

I think
View attachment 34597

Click to shrink...

AI just reminds me of Samariton from Person of interest lol

 

[BigAl]

Ai is like sat nav, its useful tool if used right, but if you rely blindly on it your the tool!