• Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.

    The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here

    If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here

The 'What have you just bought' Thread

*moot point. You need to learn shit before you can forget it.


Woah Nice! There's something left in the tank. You were doing the rope-a-dope a minute go but you came out swinging on that one. Caught me with a good one. 

 
Woah Nice! There's something left in the tank. You were doing the rope-a-dope a minute go but you came out swinging on that one. Caught me with a good one. 


tumblr_pqlfbk2ksa1twora0_540.gifv


 
So I actually can't even remember what this argument is about but hey lets fuel the flames. If it is about barrel length surely a tight bore is more important for range? Or at least the benefit from a longer barrel is less without a tighter bore as if your BB is traveling with the same FPS down a longer barrel yes you will get some extra range but also a longer distance with not the best air pressure behind it. 

Disclaimer: I have literally no idea what I am on about and that's ok. Just curious.

 
So I actually can't even remember what this argument is about but hey lets fuel the flames. If it is about barrel length surely a tight bore is more important for range? Or at least the benefit from a longer barrel is less without a tighter bore as if your BB is traveling with the same FPS down a longer barrel yes you will get some extra range but also a longer distance with not the best air pressure behind it. 

Disclaimer: I have literally no idea what I am on about and that's ok. Just curious.
A while ago 455mm was being thrown around as the optimum barrel length. Now it might have its origins in sniper forums or a particular TM model was similar length and had great performance.  

 
So I actually can't even remember what this argument is about but hey lets fuel the flames. If it is about barrel length surely a tight bore is more important for range? Or at least the benefit from a longer barrel is less without a tighter bore as if your BB is traveling with the same FPS down a longer barrel yes you will get some extra range but also a longer distance with not the best air pressure behind it. 

Disclaimer: I have literally no idea what I am on about and that's ok. Just curious.


View attachment 70792

That's a well-trodden subject that's been debated many times before. Let's not go into it here shall we?

 
So I actually can't even remember what this argument is about but hey lets fuel the flames. If it is about barrel length surely a tight bore is more important for range? Or at least the benefit from a longer barrel is less without a tighter bore as if your BB is traveling with the same FPS down a longer barrel yes you will get some extra range but also a longer distance with not the best air pressure behind it. 

Disclaimer: I have literally no idea what I am on about and that's ok. Just curious.


You are 100% correct on that too. The rest of the guys here are arguing with some guy named "SLACK_JOE" who apparently said that barrel length is the determining factor of range. I'm trying to find that comment myself. Can't seem to find it anywhere Or this shady SLACK_JOE character they've mistaken me for. Apparently this was said some time within the past 24 hours or so.

 
Last edited:
Barrel length does not affect range nor accuracy on its own, it affects the energy output and the cylinder to barrel volume ratio.

Actually over the years we have seen better performance from shorter barrels than with longer ones.

Also tight bores cause more issues than benefits.

Back on topic:

Just received a new ZCI 6.02x247 because my previous one has some nasty shit inside that throws my bbs way off. The old one will be used for experiments

Along with it, a pair of SHS nozzles with o-rings to enhance the seal on my M4s and two of those round brass delayers that should help with the increased nozzle length (21.45mm instead of the stock 21.30).

And a bottle of what I thought was silicone oil but turned out to be silicone spray -.-

On the "should arrive within the next Ice Age" list:

bunch of parts for the AK from @ak2m4 and my replacement PTS EPG grip + a bottle of proper silicone oil from Emperion (hopefully they'll throw in one of their dank patches too)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You are 100% correct on that too. The rest of the guys here are arguing with some guy named "SLACK_JOE" who apparently said that barrel length is the determining factor of range. I'm trying to find that comment myself. Can't seem to find it anywhere Or this shady SLACK_JOE character they've mistaken me for. Apparently this was said some time within the past 24 hours or so.
I am saying if I were you and you want to smaller platform but you want to play woodland. Would sticking a tight bore that's equal length in fix everything?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Barrel length does not affect range nor accuracy on its own, it affects the energy output and the cylinder to barrel volume ratio.

Actually over the years we have seen better performance from shorter barrels than with longer ones.


Again this is also correct. I hope that SLACK_JOE guy is reading this. Because this SLACK_JOE character apparently said that Barrel length is the determining factor of range. (Message yet to be discovered) He said that via messaging opting to buy a regular sized platform RIF with a barrel length longer than that of a firehawk and TK45c. Not only did SLACK_JOE say this, he damn well declared this unequivocally whilst slamming his fist on the desk.

 
Last edited:
well that escalated quickly  :blink:

my original point, to be clear, is that because barrel length alone is a very minor factor for the performance of a pew, so if you want to run a short gun outdoors then you absolutely can and there's no need to feel like you're at a performance disadvantage for doing so.

the other factors such as energy output, fps consistency, ammo quality/weight, hop setup etc all matter so much more for the task of actually slinging a bb downrange. hell the most accurate, well performing long range gun i ever built was on a 247mm barrel.

likewise if you want to run a longer barreled gun, either for having the length to poke through hedges or just because you like longer guns, that's also perfectly fine.

remember because you want to is as valid a reason as any in this hobby.

A while ago 455mm was being thrown around as the optimum barrel length. Now it might have its origins in sniper forums or a particular TM model was similar length and had great performance.  


i believe the argument there is that's 455 is the longest inner barrel that can be correctly volumed by a standard full stroke aeg cylinder, hence why some platforms (such as SR25's and SVD's) can come with extended cylinders/pistons to get a bit more volume.

of course it's a moot point when talking about bolties, gbbr's or hpa's given those operate differently.

 
I am saying if I were you and you want to smaller platform but you want to play woodland. Would sticking a tight bore that's equal length in fix everything?


*Sigh* if there is a single factor with inner barrels that determines overall performance, it's not length OR the bore size. It's the quality of the internal finish.

You can take a mediocre stock brass barrel, and lap it to a mirror finish. Assuming it's straight and true, it will shoot comparably or better than many aftermarket barrels. Hop units, rubbers and nubs have a much bigger impact on range and accuracy.

Edit - Back on topic, I had these arrive today for various projects:

View attachment 70793

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i believe the argument there is that's 455 is the longest inner barrel that can be correctly volumed by a standard full stroke aeg cylinder, hence why some platforms (such as SR25's and SVD's) can come with extended cylinders/pistons to get a bit more volume.

of course it's a moot point when talking about bolties, gbbr's or hpa's given those operate differently.
A while back remember reading that it was beyond 509mm that negative effects kick it. That was a US based forum, so that might have been with the mindset of dropping a M120 spring in everything. 

The 455mm makes more sense.   Thanks for the info. 

 
A while back remember reading that it was beyond 509mm that negative effects kick it. That was a US based forum, so that might have been with the mindset of dropping a M120 spring in everything. 

The 455mm makes more sense.   Thanks for the info. 


it's probably a range, 455ish being optimal and decreasing to 509ish before it really becomes noticable.

of course having said all that, for the 20 seconds when my mg42 was still an aeg it had no problems with accuracy whatsoever on a 650mm barrel......

 
it's probably a range, 455ish being optimal and decreasing to 509ish before it really becomes noticable.

of course having said all that, for the 20 seconds when my mg42 was still an aeg it had no problems with accuracy whatsoever on a 650mm barrel......
All the more reason we need a HK 21 aeg, close to optimum barrel length.  

 
Back
Top