Klayer04
Members
- Jan 8, 2012
- 29
- 0
Hi All!
Tried a variety of searches on this forum but couldnt find anything on this. Many may already know of it, some may not, but the aim of this topic is to show the people who dont, gauge its usefullness, and find your opinions.
I have used the Brian Badonde(bold) method to reference/link key words and phrases the majority of you will not grasp.
The recent changes into airsoft lethality (Bing) along with many skirmish sites restriction of FPS on airsoft weapons in order to play, proves the importance of FPS measurement and control.
Maybe you have recently modded your weapon, downgraded the spring or even purchased a new gun(bwah) . You will most likely be wanting to see what your potentially illegal friend(booh) is kicking out.
However what if:
-You are a student and chronograph money is beer money
-You leant your chronograph to your student mate, who broke it or sold it for beer money
-You used to own a chronograph until you took an arrow in the knee(bahhh)
-Or any other likely scenario occurs
THEN YOU ARE LEFT WITH ONE OPTION!
Poor mans chrono
Basically, shooting a coke can 1-2 inches away without holding it gives you a ROUGH idea of its FPS (For a detailed instruction how to PROPERLY carry this out look here (Bwanggg))
Yes its Cheap, Dirty and some debate its accuracy or as others have described it: 'Easy, sleazy and making me queazy' - Raptor Jesus in Psalms 14.
Fear not my brothers for there is a Third way!
A way which uses a microphone(Found on most laptops and mobile phones these days) and
Audacity (An excelent free recording/editing program (available here (Bitty bwah bwah)) to record the time it takes from your muzzle report to impact.
Using the time it takes to travel a certain distance, maths can be used to calculate the speed the round is going thus a basic, inacurate FPS can be established.
For a full instruction please visit this link (Bi Bouldnt Bont to Belapse!)
Pros and Cons i can see
Pro:
Completely Free
Greater range/scope for different velocities (Ie not restricted to the several specific FPS's as with the Poor mans Chrono)
You feel like a scientist
Cons:
More effort/less fun than 'gatting' a can point blank
Still innacurate as the fps is not from the muzzle (instead over 5 or so foot of flight- how much this would differ needs to be established)
SO! Please comment with your opinions, criticisms or even experience with this method. If anyone with a chrono who would be nice enough to compare findings between this method and the real deal then that would be most helpful in either establishing the truth and worthiness of this method, or alternatively condemning it to the AIRSOFT FAILS topic :-D
Also please add your suggestions for a standardized name for this method. First person to compare findings with a real chronograph can pick the winner :-D
Tried a variety of searches on this forum but couldnt find anything on this. Many may already know of it, some may not, but the aim of this topic is to show the people who dont, gauge its usefullness, and find your opinions.
I have used the Brian Badonde(bold) method to reference/link key words and phrases the majority of you will not grasp.
The recent changes into airsoft lethality (Bing) along with many skirmish sites restriction of FPS on airsoft weapons in order to play, proves the importance of FPS measurement and control.
Maybe you have recently modded your weapon, downgraded the spring or even purchased a new gun(bwah) . You will most likely be wanting to see what your potentially illegal friend(booh) is kicking out.
However what if:
-You are a student and chronograph money is beer money
-You leant your chronograph to your student mate, who broke it or sold it for beer money
-You used to own a chronograph until you took an arrow in the knee(bahhh)
-Or any other likely scenario occurs
THEN YOU ARE LEFT WITH ONE OPTION!
Poor mans chrono
Basically, shooting a coke can 1-2 inches away without holding it gives you a ROUGH idea of its FPS (For a detailed instruction how to PROPERLY carry this out look here (Bwanggg))
Yes its Cheap, Dirty and some debate its accuracy or as others have described it: 'Easy, sleazy and making me queazy' - Raptor Jesus in Psalms 14.
Fear not my brothers for there is a Third way!
A way which uses a microphone(Found on most laptops and mobile phones these days) and
Audacity (An excelent free recording/editing program (available here (Bitty bwah bwah)) to record the time it takes from your muzzle report to impact.
Using the time it takes to travel a certain distance, maths can be used to calculate the speed the round is going thus a basic, inacurate FPS can be established.
For a full instruction please visit this link (Bi Bouldnt Bont to Belapse!)
Pros and Cons i can see
Pro:
Completely Free
Greater range/scope for different velocities (Ie not restricted to the several specific FPS's as with the Poor mans Chrono)
You feel like a scientist
Cons:
More effort/less fun than 'gatting' a can point blank
Still innacurate as the fps is not from the muzzle (instead over 5 or so foot of flight- how much this would differ needs to be established)
SO! Please comment with your opinions, criticisms or even experience with this method. If anyone with a chrono who would be nice enough to compare findings between this method and the real deal then that would be most helpful in either establishing the truth and worthiness of this method, or alternatively condemning it to the AIRSOFT FAILS topic :-D
Also please add your suggestions for a standardized name for this method. First person to compare findings with a real chronograph can pick the winner :-D