Airsoft-Ed
Retired Moderator
- Nov 7, 2010
- 4,164
- 941
Was anyone there yesterday, or visited before when they ran a few days there last year?
Or perhaps some of you are just F&O regulars in general.
I just want to get a discussion going because I'm unsure whether it's just me, or everyone has experienced it, but considering how much money it generally costs to attend their events, I don't feel their "customer service" shall we say, is really up to much.
Marshal attitudes seem quite harsh, even if you're just asking a basic question you feel like you're putting some horrible pressure on them for an answer, it's like nothing you do can please them.
They'll jab at me for wearing too much kit, as if saying I'm taking it too seriously, but then they're the first to start shouting orders as if it's the battle of the Somme as soon as they start playing.
Their responses, tone and attitudes in general just seem to disagree with me, they seem angry, jumpy or agitated all the time. But this is the issue, is it just me? Has anyone else ever got the same feeling, or am I just an odd one out or something?
It actually feels oppressive; when marshals are around I feel like I have to be more mindful of their opinion of what's happening, than what's actually happening, and when they aren't there I feel like people push things a bit more than they would if they were being watched by a marshal.
It kind of reminds me of walking dogs - in the sense that if you're very harsh with your dog and never let it off the lead, it'll always want to get away from you, you worry it'll run away if you give it any freedom. Well, of course it will, because you've never given it any freedom, it wants some. But if you give it freedom and you keep the freedom in check, it'll keep coming back and the concept of it running away from you or its behaviour getting out of hand will become alien, you wouldn't expect it to happen, and it won't.
The marshals seem to have the lead wound too tight.
But I don't feel like I can say anything because it almost feels like if you engage them in a debate about it, they will just react negatively to you, so voicing concerns about staff attitudes just feels like sticking your neck out.
I don't want to have this discussion with them because I feel like it would lead to an argument and get me banned, instead of it being a civil discussion and them taking my points on board.
I don't even want to start this discussion on any of the Facebook pages I operate in case someone reads it and takes it the wrong way.
Perhaps there's a brighter side to them when you raise points like this, it's just the way they come across more generally makes me doubtful enough to not want to try.
I feel anxious enough about posting this at all because last time I went public with concerns about a site, their regulars practically became a lynch mob, as did some of their staff.
The reason I didn't approach that site about the issue at the time is the exact same reason I didn't feel up to a confrontation with the staff at First and Only yesterday.
If people don't seem like they would take well to negative feedback, then I'd rather just deal with it and ask others about their opinion of it afterwards.
I think better on paper than in person because there's no pressure to respond immediately, I get the opportunity to gather my thoughts first.
So, has anyone else thought this before?
Or perhaps some of you are just F&O regulars in general.
I just want to get a discussion going because I'm unsure whether it's just me, or everyone has experienced it, but considering how much money it generally costs to attend their events, I don't feel their "customer service" shall we say, is really up to much.
Marshal attitudes seem quite harsh, even if you're just asking a basic question you feel like you're putting some horrible pressure on them for an answer, it's like nothing you do can please them.
They'll jab at me for wearing too much kit, as if saying I'm taking it too seriously, but then they're the first to start shouting orders as if it's the battle of the Somme as soon as they start playing.
Their responses, tone and attitudes in general just seem to disagree with me, they seem angry, jumpy or agitated all the time. But this is the issue, is it just me? Has anyone else ever got the same feeling, or am I just an odd one out or something?
It actually feels oppressive; when marshals are around I feel like I have to be more mindful of their opinion of what's happening, than what's actually happening, and when they aren't there I feel like people push things a bit more than they would if they were being watched by a marshal.
It kind of reminds me of walking dogs - in the sense that if you're very harsh with your dog and never let it off the lead, it'll always want to get away from you, you worry it'll run away if you give it any freedom. Well, of course it will, because you've never given it any freedom, it wants some. But if you give it freedom and you keep the freedom in check, it'll keep coming back and the concept of it running away from you or its behaviour getting out of hand will become alien, you wouldn't expect it to happen, and it won't.
The marshals seem to have the lead wound too tight.
But I don't feel like I can say anything because it almost feels like if you engage them in a debate about it, they will just react negatively to you, so voicing concerns about staff attitudes just feels like sticking your neck out.
I don't want to have this discussion with them because I feel like it would lead to an argument and get me banned, instead of it being a civil discussion and them taking my points on board.
I don't even want to start this discussion on any of the Facebook pages I operate in case someone reads it and takes it the wrong way.
Perhaps there's a brighter side to them when you raise points like this, it's just the way they come across more generally makes me doubtful enough to not want to try.
I feel anxious enough about posting this at all because last time I went public with concerns about a site, their regulars practically became a lynch mob, as did some of their staff.
The reason I didn't approach that site about the issue at the time is the exact same reason I didn't feel up to a confrontation with the staff at First and Only yesterday.
If people don't seem like they would take well to negative feedback, then I'd rather just deal with it and ask others about their opinion of it afterwards.
I think better on paper than in person because there's no pressure to respond immediately, I get the opportunity to gather my thoughts first.
So, has anyone else thought this before?
Last edited by a moderator: