As a newbie to airsoft, I've done the usual and trawled through endless threads trying to figure out the best way to make my new toy 'better', and been bamboozled by the varying, contrary and sometimes downright contradictory opinions on what works and what doesn't. And it all seems to come down to the fact that there are large gaps in understanding of what actually happens when you pull the trigger. So I've spent a little time thinking about the mechanics of launching a small ball through the air with some back spin to take advantage of the Magnus Effect, the results of which are noted below. These are pure thought experiments with no evidence to back them up, (yet, but I'm looking for proper science to back some of them up) mixed with practical experience of what works in spring piston air rifles.
1
Any spring rifle will be subject to recoil before the projectile has even started moving in the barrel. In a spring air rifle this is so pronounced that if you don't support the rifle in a neutral manner that is identical every time then the effect this has on the recoil will affect the point of impact (POA). Look up 'Artillery hold' for more information. This makes a good argument for trying to ensure that all the different (critical) parts of the assembly are held securely and immovably together.
2
If you have a 6.05mm barrel and a 5.97mm BB to give the accepted 'best' clearance of 0.08mm, then almost 3% of the cross sectional area of the barrel is effectively open to gas/ air blow by. So we have to accept that it is not a perfectly sealed system and all the time the BB is being accelerated up the barrel, gas will be passing it. It has to, as the only way the BB can accelerate is if there is more pressure behind it than in front of it. Now, I don't know if the Magnus Effect works in a closed tube, but if we assume that the BB is travelling along the top surface of the barrel (which seems to be supported by observation of wear in barrels) and that it already has backspin imparted by the hop, then that air passing between the BB and the lower surface of the barrel is going to produce a low pressure area, possibly enough to separate the BB from the upper surface of the barrel. What happens then is any ones guess, but I'm going to suggest that as air is able to pass all round the BB and the low pressure area on just one side is replaced by low pressure pulling in all directions equally, the Magnus effect takes over and reattaches the BB to the ceiling of the barrel. In effect the BB 'skips' along the barrel ceiling until it exits. This could also have an effect on side to side variation. In a close fitting barrel the BB would only have to deviate a fraction from the axis of the barrel and as it reattaches to the ceiling its periphery won't touch perpendicular to the axis of spin. It will contact the 'curve' of the ceiling to one side or the other. If however you're using a 6.23 barrel the geometry is is the BBs favour. Imagine rolling a tennis ball down a length of gutter compared to doing the same thing with a marble.
3
When the BB is first loaded into, lets call it the chamber, there is a lump of rubber in the way stopping it simply rolling out. So it's going to take a certain amount of pressure built up behind the BB to get it moving. Except it's a far from perfect air seal. Reduce the clearance in the chamber to 0.03mm (ie 6.00mm on a 5.97mm BB) and the gap reduces to less than 1% of the cross sectional area, which means the piston is going to have to travel less distance to create the pressure to give the BB it's initial shove. And if you could accelerate the piston faster to the point where the BB starts to move and give the BB a higher acceleration over the hop...more backspin.
And while we're talking about the hop, there are a dozen plus ways to try an centre the BB under the hop or the hop over the BB. H nubs, M nubs, concave nubs, double arm hop ups, Miracle Barrels etc. Or you could just, maybe, reduce the bore to a tighter clearance at the hop? Eliminate variance in the initial position of the BB and all those issues go away. This incidentally is something I'm going to try, and it would retro fit into pretty much anything.
Anyway, that'll do for now. Please feel free to shoot me down in flames, add something, point and laugh, whatever. I'll be interested to hear the thoughts of others more experienced than me.
1
Any spring rifle will be subject to recoil before the projectile has even started moving in the barrel. In a spring air rifle this is so pronounced that if you don't support the rifle in a neutral manner that is identical every time then the effect this has on the recoil will affect the point of impact (POA). Look up 'Artillery hold' for more information. This makes a good argument for trying to ensure that all the different (critical) parts of the assembly are held securely and immovably together.
2
If you have a 6.05mm barrel and a 5.97mm BB to give the accepted 'best' clearance of 0.08mm, then almost 3% of the cross sectional area of the barrel is effectively open to gas/ air blow by. So we have to accept that it is not a perfectly sealed system and all the time the BB is being accelerated up the barrel, gas will be passing it. It has to, as the only way the BB can accelerate is if there is more pressure behind it than in front of it. Now, I don't know if the Magnus Effect works in a closed tube, but if we assume that the BB is travelling along the top surface of the barrel (which seems to be supported by observation of wear in barrels) and that it already has backspin imparted by the hop, then that air passing between the BB and the lower surface of the barrel is going to produce a low pressure area, possibly enough to separate the BB from the upper surface of the barrel. What happens then is any ones guess, but I'm going to suggest that as air is able to pass all round the BB and the low pressure area on just one side is replaced by low pressure pulling in all directions equally, the Magnus effect takes over and reattaches the BB to the ceiling of the barrel. In effect the BB 'skips' along the barrel ceiling until it exits. This could also have an effect on side to side variation. In a close fitting barrel the BB would only have to deviate a fraction from the axis of the barrel and as it reattaches to the ceiling its periphery won't touch perpendicular to the axis of spin. It will contact the 'curve' of the ceiling to one side or the other. If however you're using a 6.23 barrel the geometry is is the BBs favour. Imagine rolling a tennis ball down a length of gutter compared to doing the same thing with a marble.
3
When the BB is first loaded into, lets call it the chamber, there is a lump of rubber in the way stopping it simply rolling out. So it's going to take a certain amount of pressure built up behind the BB to get it moving. Except it's a far from perfect air seal. Reduce the clearance in the chamber to 0.03mm (ie 6.00mm on a 5.97mm BB) and the gap reduces to less than 1% of the cross sectional area, which means the piston is going to have to travel less distance to create the pressure to give the BB it's initial shove. And if you could accelerate the piston faster to the point where the BB starts to move and give the BB a higher acceleration over the hop...more backspin.
And while we're talking about the hop, there are a dozen plus ways to try an centre the BB under the hop or the hop over the BB. H nubs, M nubs, concave nubs, double arm hop ups, Miracle Barrels etc. Or you could just, maybe, reduce the bore to a tighter clearance at the hop? Eliminate variance in the initial position of the BB and all those issues go away. This incidentally is something I'm going to try, and it would retro fit into pretty much anything.
Anyway, that'll do for now. Please feel free to shoot me down in flames, add something, point and laugh, whatever. I'll be interested to hear the thoughts of others more experienced than me.