Why shouldn’t people in the UK hold firearms if they choose to and pass all the checks and balances. Would you also stop people smoking and drinking as this is harmful for health and costs the country a lot of money each year?
im going to thro my two cents out there...
personally i agree that people in the UK should be allowed to own any kind of firearm they wish AS LONG AS THEY PASS THE RELEVANT CHECKS AND BALANCES
my personal opinion is that being able to use a real steel firearm for target shooting is a fine sport that can help people relax and forget about the stresses of their working week... its just you, the sights and the target, the rest of the world falls away in the background. this is the reason i own an air rifle and would regularly go to a range (before this damned virus) but i just wish that i could shoot real guns over greater, more challenging distances where windage and gravity etc come into play.
i also feel that being able to use real steel guns will help with the preservation of old classics, as well as educating people more about firearms. more education about firearms will then have the benefit of limiting misinformation feeding the knee-jerk "cancel all scary things" crowd.
now, i can also see the call for gun restriction to make it harder for criminals to use them... but as has already been stated before, if someone really wants to break the law, then they will find a way and there is nothing that anyone can do to stop them, so why criminalise average, law abiding citizens just because one or two nutters MIGHT use a gun to commit a crime. i also dont think that we should let just anyone walk in to a gun shop and buy a machine gun immediately, however i do believe that those who have a number of years with clean records should be allowed to be able to earn the right to own such guns.
im NOT suggesting we become as liberal as america and allow just anyone to buy a gun on a whim, but rather we keep the system of checks and balances that are already in place, just allowing law abiding gun owners the ability to own a greater range of firearms. and also keep in place the law that ALL gun sales must be brokered through an approved gun shop who will handle background checks and the transfer pa for example, a collector of ww2 guns can currently own bolt action rifles like the lee enfield, but cannot own an m1 garand...
i also think that restrictions that are currently in place should also be extended. for example, current laws state that with the appropriate category of firearms licence and passing the right background checks and balances, we can own pistols (proper pistol, not a carbine-ised version with the coathanger stock and welded on smoothbore barrel) BUT the pistol has to be stored in the gun safe of an approved pistol range or section 5 firearms licence holder, so you ONLY have access to it on the range... now if someone wants to own, lets say a browning M2, then they should be allowed to do so, BUT it, or the critical parts that make it work, MUST be kept under supervision of a section 5 approved person or facility to limit access to it, and thus the chance for it to be used for criminal acts.
all the above examples are simplified versions, due to the extreme complexity of firearms laws here in the UK, but with that level of gun control in place, i argue that a greater range of firearms should be made available to law abiding citizens, again, AS LONG AS THE APPROPRIATE CHECKS AND BALANCES ARE PASSED
If we all take this approach then there won’t be any airsoft retailers left once lockdown is over. I justify my needless spending on the basis I am helping the hobby survive one of its darkest hours.
we all need to do our bit and keep buying random shit we don’t need....
agreed. times are hard enough for retailers in general, not just airsoft ones... if everyone suddenly stops spending full stop, then it wont be just our favourite sport and suppliers at risk of going broke and disappearing.
and just like
@Adolf Hamster my spending hasnt stopped, but it has been significantly cut back