So 7.2 Nimh would give lower fps than a 7.2 lipo?
Oh, crikey, I've just noticed that you said
fps rather than
rps.
The battery and motor are irrelevant to the fps / kinetic energy of the BB. They'll either pull the piston and spring back until it releases, or they wont. You'll get the same energy each shot[*], all that will change by shoving more electrons around is the rate of fire and trigger response.
[*]Technically, if you're running the gun so fast that the sector gear pre-engages with the piston before it's all the way forward, you'll get lower energy, but that's the least of your concerns at that point since your piston and/or gears are going to shred. If you ever put together a gun that
can do that, then that's a case where you could use a smartish mosfet to
reduce the rate of fire, while still retaining snappy semi-auto response.
Shimming your is satisfying, but there's always the possibility that you'll make it
worse than the Chinese sweatshop child that did it in 30 seconds. I'd echo the sentiment that it's something to do once you have two usable guns. A quick-change spring makes the process of getting the gearbox apart and back together a lot less fraught. Some strong flat magnets are handy to stick under it to hold everything in place.
As usual, Luke at Negative cuts through the woo and just does it pragmatically, while tripping balls on red wine and gabapentin.