I'd say people with shitty attitudes seem to be more comfortable expressing their beliefs but this goes for life in general, not just in airsoft. Fortunately there are sites where it's not tolerated and I find they also tend to be the better run ones.
The problem i found was not even the good sites could stop a cadre of bad apples from rocking up and ruining it for everyone. And when there became enough bad apples to make "is my days airsofting going to be uplifting or infuriating" basically a 50/50 coin flip (well, when i realised that's what had happened at least) it becomes hard to continue.
We've all had moments of annoyance, and i'm ashamed to admit that i've shouted at folks, and even a few times held the trigger a bit longer than was strictly necessary over some percieved slight.
The keyword there though is ashamed, this new flavour is people doing those same things but with a sense of pride born out of some bullshit bravado that being the toughest toy soldier in all of weekend warrior land is some sort of flex.
Unfortunately I don't think there is a single solution for dealing with the problem short of him being removed from all social media, but there's probably more chance of me being the next pope.
I think you're right there, as much as i hate that being the conclusion.
People need to remember to think before posting and not to react so quickly to obvious ragebait. To go back to my fire analogy we may not be able to put the fire out but we can certainly stop it from spreading
I'm not saying that you're specifically calling me out here, but given i knew even when posting my response to the white teeth wager i had to preface it with "taking that at face value" it does make a good case study.
Its hard sometimes, the bait can be real tasty. And all i'm going off is one picture of a bush wookie (that may or may not be km) with a text overlay of a thing that triggered me. I dont follow km content closely enough to know if this is canon or if for all i know mrfoxhound fabricated it out of whole cloth or just copypastad from [social media site] uncritically. (not actually accusing fox of those things fwiw just pointing out that from where i sit it's a possibility with no contrary evidence).
Hence having to caveat to the effect of "assuming that is km and he really did say what the picture says". I suppose it doesnt matter when the next anti-afuk post has:
Fuck off with that, and any site that doesnt insta-ban someone for that can fuck right off too.
And
find a different hobby or preferably a therapist.
With zero context, and whilst i hope some of his flock might put the legwork in to research the quotes and see the context we all know nobody but lawyers and academics ever read the sources (the former more than the latter ime).
On the flip side i still stand by what i said, even if the context is that its a statement taylored to get people like to me to react. the issue is someone might be unstable enough to engage in the wager.
Its the same objection i have to the "km isnt real he's a character" argument, yes thats true but even if we took as a premise that the real man behind it doesnt support what the character does (i know there is evidence contrary to that this is just a hypothetical), doesnt make it any less damaging when someone decides to emulate the character and a real person gets to be on the recieving end.
Had someone taken the white teeth bet and succeeded, then some poor sod would have gotten injured and "it was a joke for the lulz" isnt going to pay his dentist bill.