- Oct 7, 2017
- 6,092
- 5,419
that's my point, the irony of it is technically its all to protect the site not us the player.OK, we're at the briefing, you've got 30 seconds to unequivocally define what eye protection is and isn't "suitable" at your site in a way that's allows players, most of whom are only half listening, and some of whom might not speak English as their first language, to objectively determine whether what they've brought meets or doesn't meet that standard: GO.
Meaningless, as repeatedly explained with references to the primary legislation.
we chrono the guns but nobody checks players eyewear to ensure they're up to the job, & prob 99%+ will be, but you know what they say........
View attachment 45221