That doesn't sound right, especially given GDPR and what's posted on UKARA's website. Surely you need a valid reason to access their database.
The purpose of the UKARA database holding personal information is to validate RIF sales
A prospective buyer could make a complaint under GDPR if it is not used to do so
Validation does not require the data to be shared ……
Fred Bloggs gives his address 999 Letsbee Avenue and a UKARA number to John Smith
John Smith enquires with the UKARA or a site
If the enquiry is denied Fred Bloggs raises a complaint about inappropriate holding of their personal data when it does not get used for its stated purpose
Cheers guys. One more question - unless I am mistaken, it's actually easier to obtain an air rifle (which may even look like a proper machine gun) without any licence, and airsoft RIFs are harder to get than something that can cause much more harm. There doesn't seem to be (because it isn't needed) any UKARA type of organisation for air rifles. The only limitation is its firing power, and the legal "free for all" models easily exceeding airsoft RIFs in joules. Is that so, and if true there's something wrong with the law.
You’re going to get me and
@Rogerborg agreeing to disagree again
Historically I would say that an air weapon is a firearm under Firearms legislation, therefore an air weapon cannot be an IF even if brightly coloured nor a RIF even if identical to a full on section 5 or illegal firearm
and Rogerborg would differ on the basis of an air weapon that is clearly a classic air weapon vs identical to full on firearms
But there has been a case (last year?) … he put it up on the forum
The precident has happened