• Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.

    The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here

    If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here

Policing and Crime Bill 2015-16 - This is now (mostly) the law as part of the Policing and Crime Act 2017

"meanwhile in parliament govt seeks to reclassify tens of thousands of toy guns as firearms."


Yeah this has always peeved me off. Why do they spend money, time and resources banning toys? Surely there are more profit-making noble things the HO/gvmnt could do? 

Is it really the case that people in this country are so gun-phobic ( for want of the real word ), that they'll ban anything that looks like a real gun?

"Oh, I know what will really lower gun crime: banning toys that can't be converted into guns, but look like them, so the general public think we're doing something"

The worst part is that people have been shooting each other at over 370 fps in full auto over the pond for years now. What, is it just that our friends in America won't die of getting shot by a 380 fps RIF with .2s and we can, hence the lethal limit criteria? What's their secret? CBS? Burgers? Metallica?

 
The worst part is that people have been shooting each other at over 370 fps in full auto over the pond for years now. What, is it just that our friends in America won't die of getting shot by a 380 fps RIF with .2s and we can, hence the lethal limit criteria? What's their secret? CBS? Burgers? Metallica?


Come now, if our convention was 450fps auto and 600 fps on .2 single you know the yanks would have 550 and 800. :P

 
"Oh, I know what will really lower gun crime: banning toys that can't be converted into guns, but look like them, so the general public think we're doing something
There's your answer , it looks good on paper to the masses who don't know any better,  the media get headlines to sell and the government get to pat themselves on the back because the think they have done something good. That and I think they are just ignorant to anything outside of what they like to do in their spare time. 

 
Better hold of on upgrading to HPA a bit longer then. This needs clarifying.
My thoughts as I was thinking of going down the HPA route, and the shop I know well warned me about this and to hold off until there is more clarification.

 
So what about paintball? are they not getting a cap? seems abit unfair when they can fire upto 12ft/lbs thats about 16.0 joules right or am i wrong?

just seems to me that Airsoft is getting the Sh*tty end of the stick. just because our guns look more real.

 
So what about paintball? are they not getting a cap? seems abit unfair when they can fire upto 12ft/lbs thats about 16.0 joules right or am i wrong?

just seems to me that Airsoft is getting the Sh*tty end of the stick. just because our guns look more real.
http://www.bzpaintball.co.uk/paintball-guns-paintball-markers

http://www.rap4uk.com/Paintball-Guns-s/1.htm

Plenty of RiFs there.

I have no idea why these stores appear to not adhere to VCRA though. I assume its because every member of the public can distinguish paintball guns from Airsoft RIFs and Real guns by sight.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Suppose the fact that most pb guns  have big hoppers on top, differentiates them and makes them less realistic. 

I was about to buy an hpa rif a few weeks ago, but like many. I am now going to either wait or just pick up a new AEG. It's a shame they can't get this cleared up quickly, but that's the British law making system for you. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Suppose the fact that most pb guns  have big hoppers on top, differentiates them and makes them less realistic.


Really? That doesn't seem to be the case at point of sale.

Yes it is, I've put aside funds for a PR-15 Ver 2. Hoping I'll actually be able to buy it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also you've got the fact that they're going on the whole "lethality" basis, and that- in their eyes requires the projectile to have a chance of penetrating skin. A big paintball ( Pressure = Force / Area ) that is liquid filled and gelatin (I think) cased has a very low chance of penetrating skin compared to a solid 6mm BB. However they fail to see that even at 500 FPS, in most instances you'll only get a welt because of how quickly the BB loses energy as it flies, and how the faster it goes, the more resistive forces act against it; hence losing more kinetic energy in a shorter period of time. 

 
Also you've got the fact that they're going on the whole "lethality" basis, and that- in their eyes requires the projectile to have a chance of penetrating skin. A big paintball ( Pressure = Force / Area ) that is liquid filled and gelatin (I think) cased has a very low chance of penetrating skin compared to a solid 6mm BB. However they fail to see that even at 500 FPS, in most instances you'll only get a welt because of how quickly the BB loses energy as it flies, and how the faster it goes, the more resistive forces act against it; hence losing more kinetic energy in a shorter period of time. 


i get they're going the "lethality" route but...



 
Last edited by a moderator:
Damn, well I've never seen something like that before. That paintball must've been frozen or something, but I agree with you. 

I think it's also got something to do with the public awareness surrounding paintball, and the lack of awareness surrounding airsoft. They can mess around with airsoft all they like, but if paintball were banned, it'd be all over the news, and people would be upset.

Then again, the health and safety parade are trying to "encourage children to header the ball less" in football because players who've headed the ball a lot have brain damage nowadays so god knows what will come next.

No more running because it causes bad knees in old age?

No more standing around? Reminds me of George Carlin.

 
So do we have a definitive answer about this yet or is it all just conjecture at this point, I ask as I spent more than 1k on a HPA weapon I have not yet used in the field.

 
So what about paintball? are they not getting a cap? seems abit unfair when they can fire upto 12ft/lbs thats about 16.0 joules right or am i wrong?

just seems to me that Airsoft is getting the Sh*tty end of the stick. just because our guns look more real.
Under this bill I believe that paintball still gets covered in the firearms act by the frangibility of paintballs.

(I'll get to that video later!)

Airsoft benefits with the vcra and the firearms act amendment with the specific airsoft entries.

But 'reball' rubber Paintball's have always been a bit dodgy.  Legal under the air weapons 12 foot pounds for rifles or 6 foot pounds for pistols.  Paintball guns in general are not rifles, but are 'gallery guns'

Under this amendment reballs probably fall into the 1.3 joules category, because they aren't frangible so don't have the get out clause.

Reballs are used by some players for shooting practice and in shooting gallery setups, but there are some sites that run reballs and have been keeping their head down in the sand

 
http://www.bzpaintball.co.uk/paintball-guns-paintball-markers

http://www.rap4uk.com/Paintball-Guns-s/1.htm

Plenty of RiFs there.

I have no idea why these stores appear to not adhere to VCRA though. I assume its because every member of the public can distinguish paintball guns from Airsoft RIFs and Real guns by sight.
Some in paintball have buried their heads in the sand with regard to vcra and ignore that a rif is not an absolute definition but as seen in the eyes of the beholder

Irrespective of hopper etc

when the act was just a bill the ukpsf did not fight for paintballs position on rifs as it would have been a losing battle, the majority of paintball has and had no realism requirements.  There was a small milsim community, but they used what equipment was available, and played in a milsim style.  A couple of people built very realistic custom guns

A small number of real looking guns were available to buy, primarily imported at great expense from rap4

rap4uk was formed which left the risk at customs to the importing retailer rather than the buyer

Rap4uk were informally visited by the association of chief constables with a fact finding study.  No surprise that they indicated that much of the stock would be considered rifs, but there was a surprise about how many of the classic paintball guns could be considered rifs. Rap4uk were advised to think about the situation and come up with something to cover themselves

They created a voluntary membership scheme and offered a 2 tone option (as rap 4 had been born in the police/military training market they already had a blue & orange range). They were criticised in paintball until they pointed out the circumstances of the visit

More recently with magfed being born there are clear rifs and the paintball retailers went to the ukpsf to raise the issue with the home office.

The home office looked at them and gave a two part answer (subject to being tested in court) 

1) that the firearms act & paintball frangibility may trump the vcra and paintball is fine for realistic guns

2) that membership schemes may allow for a skirmisher type defence; either by retailers or ukpsf membership

(as the vcra refers to airsoft skirmishing rather than skirmishing then it's really stretching the legislation to apply a membership scheme to paintball)

To date incidents with paintball guns have been dealt with based on the other crimes or antisocial activities taking place, and not as a firearms or vcra offence

One not very well know case was attempted suicide by cop.  A formerly well known paintballer who built custom guns went off the rails and wanted to end it.  Fortunately he made a goodbye cruel world call to his ex and she reported the situation to the police saving his life.  There was a full on armed police siege but no shooting 

 
i get they're going the "lethality" route but...
This has been a well used video and despite the descjription isn't paintball

It is a paintball gun, but is shooting 'less than lethal' balls, which are very illegal here, but are openly available in South Africa and the US

It has been said to be a rubber reball but would have to be shot at a major velocity to penetrate skin, and is most likely one of the balls with a solid internal ball and a rubber skin.  These are designed to break windows to allow subsequent pepper balls to be fired in

 
You may ask what a paintballer is doing here .... I'm primarily a scenario paintballer but have played every form of paintball in the uk and am also an event photographer

My team are also event organisers who run both scenario paintball events and airsoft events 

I'm one of those paintballers who sees paintball and airsoft as similar activities of people that like to go out and play shooting at their mates

 
More recently with magfed being born there are clear rifs and the paintball retailers went to the ukpsf to raise the issue with the home office.

The home office looked at them and gave a two part answer (subject to being tested in court) 

1) that the firearms act & paintball frangibility may trump the vcra and paintball is fine for realistic guns

2) that membership schemes may allow for a skirmisher type defence; either by retailers or ukpsf membership

(as the vcra refers to airsoft skirmishing rather than skirmishing then it's really stretching the legislation to apply a membership scheme to paintball)


Please elaborate on this insanity, :) I fail to understand what the projectile fired has to do with something being a RIF - deactivated firearms are RIF and they don't fire anything..

 
Paintball guns in general are not rifles, but are 'gallery guns'


why isnt an Airsort gun classed a  "gallery Gun" then?

they share the same characteristics as a painball gun.

definition of gallery gun:  a type of firearm designed for indoor shooting.

 
Back
Top