Oops....Met Police leave bag of guns outside Mayor of Londons house.

How is the mayor of London dodgy lol?
Under his direction numerous schemes & projects have been railroaded through, even when the "data" used to support them has been proven to be false, ulez being one of the biggest examples.
Then there's all the green belt land, including public parks etc, that he'd Previously stated would remain untouched, but have now been sold off, or infringed upon, in order to facilitate private developments.
The fact that his own personal fortune has apparently grown massively, along with his property portfolio, far exceeding his declared public income, points to how he cant be trusted.
 
Under his direction numerous schemes & projects have been railroaded through, even when the "data" used to support them has been proven to be false, ulez being one of the biggest examples.
Then there's all the green belt land, including public parks etc, that he'd Previously stated would remain untouched, but have now been sold off, or infringed upon, in order to facilitate private developments.
The fact that his own personal fortune has apparently grown massively, along with his property portfolio, far exceeding his declared public income, points to how he cant be trusted.
Thanks for this. Can you please provide evidence and sources for your claims?

E.G his property portfolio? London green land that has been sold off which previously wasn’t allowed to be sold off?
 
Thanks for this. Can you please provide evidence and sources for your claims?

E.G his property portfolio? London green land that has been sold off which previously wasn’t allowed to be sold off?
Lol, i don't need to, its all out there, including numerous televised, or at least filmed, when select committees have questioned him on policies & projects he has allowed to be implemented, under the purview of his role of mayor of London.
During those interviews, when presented with facts, either historical or scientific, he will either defer to third parties or usually just clam up, literally refuse to answer those questions directly.
Now short of saying no "no comment" like a criminal under caution, what are we to take from his apparent silence ?
I'm not going to start rooting around the net to find these previously seen interviews, for starters ill be the first to admit that when it comes to IT, im rubbish, plus even if I wasn't, I don't have the time to pander to you, i guess you're a fan-boi of Mr Khans ?, & what little bit of time I get to call my own is usually spent trying to keeping the undesirables out of this place, & dealing with the petty squabbles.
What i will say is, though I'm not naive, im fully aware that barely anyone who gets in to politics, does so for the right reasons, I trust none of them as far as I could throw them, but being a born & bred Londoner, who now lives way out of the capital, but has the misfortune of having to travel to Central London regularly, & still has friends & family there, im more than aware that many of the changes implemented by him, & tfl etc, during his tenure, have done little to improve things for the average Londoner, & in some cases have added to financial hardships they already face.
 
Thanks for this. Can you please provide evidence and sources for your claims?

E.G his property portfolio? London green land that has been sold off which previously wasn’t allowed to be sold off?
For a start the ASA have found TfL and the GLA guilty of making misleading claims in adverts for extending the ULEZ. Then there's the broken election promises on housing, in 10 years he hasn't kept a single one.
 
Back
Top