I think it’s a good idea and could be of use to those trying to build specific kits.
However, as mentioned be prepared to be told that you’re wrong by the loadout and experts.
I’m quite fond of ‘experts’ who state with ‘authority’ that a British Army load out is wrong when on operations you get numerous mixes of uniform & equipment in MTP, multicam, DPM, olive, and issue (let alone 1950 era issue belt on just out of Sandhurst 2nd Lieutenant), QM GPC purchase, PRI purchase, private purchase.
Then when not on operation there are all the different regimental dress codes, combat loads, shouty man’s dress code etc
When the Army can’t agree on sleeves up/down, shirts (light jacket) tucked in/out etc and the CGS sends out an Army wide order on when up/down applies and that C95 is tucked in but PCS is out - but the Army stiffly disobeys, followed by CGSs new order of “I don’t give a shit whether it’s up/down/in/out, you can have local orders - but be fucking consistent”*
* not the officially published wording
Hey Everyone,
Im putting together a couple Milsim guides for DEVGRU, KSK, SAS e.t.c these kits would have all gear commonly used by these units and any variations you might find. Perfect if you want your imitation to be spot on!
Let me know if you would be interested
On topic now …..
Loadout guides appear in some magazines as an article, or also as explicit or less explicit advertising, sometimes as web articles etc and can be aimed at airsoft, reenactment, model making etc
They can also be research such as Osprey guides, museums, photos & paintings etc
Theres a lot of information out there.
The thing that may make a difference is whether you are collating and publishing the information or selling guides
Many people will be interested in reading a guide, less would pay for it