HuttArmouries
Members
- Jan 31, 2019
- 1,006
- 572
Im looking to get a nice ak but im not sure which way to go.
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a wood stock classic ak most likely or an underfolder. I already have 2 cymas which cover me for modern gunsUsed to nearly say LCT as a default but since the Nuprol deal with the corresponding price increase, a lot less difference in prices.
Is there a particular model you are looking at (tactical/Cold War era)? Find the LCT easier to work on but the E&L is slightly sturdier.
While I am a big advocate of Real Sword I personally don't currently think they are better then E&L or LCT.Unless you need it to be Russian, I would reccomend a realsword.
Better than the other 2.
Most likely the akm with the underfolding stock.@HuttArmouries ?
I’m curious what E&L model you will get?
I have 2 E&L models and I’m planning to get a LCT version, to compare them with my other versions? ??
?GAMBLE?
Ugh, underfolder. The ginger step child of the AK family
Ive owned 5 LCT's and one E&L
i only have one AK left and its an E&L
I would agree that LCT are slightly easier to work on
E&L do feel different but it's marginal, which used to make it easier to choose the LCT based on price.
If the prices are now similar and if the variant you desire is made by both I would pick the E&L
afaik isn't the main difference between lct/e&l is that e&l is closer to RS spec whereas lct is closer to airsoft spec (for things like handguards, stocks etc)
tbh from what i've seen they're both perfectly good.
Then why not get a higher end CYMA?Im not all that concerned with having something which is 100% real spec which is why I left real sword out as an option due to the price. By the looks of it ill be going for an e&l
Out of curiosity why did you keep the E&L over the LCT? I'm assuming that you found the quality superior given the E&L is the one you opted to keep?