Darkmikey22
Members
- May 3, 2014
- 293
- 954
Lambda have had 3 years to get this going.
Yes they provided a prototype, which although externally was good quality, was still incomplete. The internals were intermittent and was a right faff to get working. Which then failed all together and fell apart. The top magazine feature didn't work/wasnt ready. Effectively, lambda had only sent a half finished prototype that wasnt in anway fit for purpose, still equates to poor quality.
So yes.... it is incomplete... when they state that wasn't the case.
And financial demands.....
so DCA had paid for the set up cost up front.
Yes there were some hick ups lambda end. And Dave added more money.
But as time went on, and pre orders started getting cancelled, he couldn't keep plowing money into something that had no sign of being produced.
The time frames DCA kept giving, were lambdas very own time frames. Not the unrealistic ones they've made out DCA had set. But as time went on and the prototype sent was sub par. Yes he quite rightly either wanted a product or his money back. For an item that had a legal deadline drawn up by both parties lawyers, which was promised to be ready and off the shelf in under 2 years, yet still had no working prototype after 3....
You can't blame him for having enough.
In that 3 years, lambda have managed to design and manufacture both the ghm9 and a mp443
Pistol....
Yet can't even get one prototype ready. That was paid for upfront.
I'd be fuming too.
Yes they provided a prototype, which although externally was good quality, was still incomplete. The internals were intermittent and was a right faff to get working. Which then failed all together and fell apart. The top magazine feature didn't work/wasnt ready. Effectively, lambda had only sent a half finished prototype that wasnt in anway fit for purpose, still equates to poor quality.
So yes.... it is incomplete... when they state that wasn't the case.
And financial demands.....
so DCA had paid for the set up cost up front.
Yes there were some hick ups lambda end. And Dave added more money.
But as time went on, and pre orders started getting cancelled, he couldn't keep plowing money into something that had no sign of being produced.
The time frames DCA kept giving, were lambdas very own time frames. Not the unrealistic ones they've made out DCA had set. But as time went on and the prototype sent was sub par. Yes he quite rightly either wanted a product or his money back. For an item that had a legal deadline drawn up by both parties lawyers, which was promised to be ready and off the shelf in under 2 years, yet still had no working prototype after 3....
You can't blame him for having enough.
In that 3 years, lambda have managed to design and manufacture both the ghm9 and a mp443
Pistol....
Yet can't even get one prototype ready. That was paid for upfront.
I'd be fuming too.
