Does anyone else have any experience with this? In two different guns I've reversed a non linear spring so the more densely coiled end is inside the piston and seen a 7-10 fps increase. Fit it back the other way and the fps reverts back to what it was.
I'm currently in 'intense discussion' with various people over the effect with them insisting turning the spring around doesn't make a difference, and myself trying to figure out what it is I'm measuring...
So here's my thinking. A non linear spring (M100) weighs 12.6g. This is split about 55:45 one end to the other which means the more densely coiled end is about 1g heavier. This means you have effectively increased the piston weight by 1g by reversing the spring.
From messing around with piston weights, depending on the original weight and the BB weight, increasing the piston mass by around 1g can give an fps increase of about the same amount as turning the spring around.
Am I kidding myself, or am I heading in the right direction with this?
I'm currently in 'intense discussion' with various people over the effect with them insisting turning the spring around doesn't make a difference, and myself trying to figure out what it is I'm measuring...
So here's my thinking. A non linear spring (M100) weighs 12.6g. This is split about 55:45 one end to the other which means the more densely coiled end is about 1g heavier. This means you have effectively increased the piston weight by 1g by reversing the spring.
From messing around with piston weights, depending on the original weight and the BB weight, increasing the piston mass by around 1g can give an fps increase of about the same amount as turning the spring around.
Am I kidding myself, or am I heading in the right direction with this?
Last edited by a moderator: