-
Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.
The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here
If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here
G&G VSS!!!
- Thread starter Zak Da Mack
- Start date
Ian_Gere
Retired Moderator
- Apr 1, 2012
- 6,417
- 2,050
See now that just shows a lack of ambition!
What about an MG42 for comparison? And MP40 and MP44 to have loadout options...
PPSh41 for coolsies. AN-94 just because and a Bizon for when you've got arm ache. Oh and let's not forget the humble Pistola Makarova!
Bren gun, GPMG, L86A2, working L1A1
HK417...? Certainly a USP .45 Match, how about Beretta CX4 Storm?
TacMaster
Members
- Dec 3, 2012
- 1,888
- 848
Last edited by a moderator:
Ian_Gere
Retired Moderator
- Apr 1, 2012
- 6,417
- 2,050
Does anybody know anything about S&T's VSS?
Personally, I can't even figure out how to buy anything from them :lol: Maybe they've gone bust? I've emailed 'em via their contact form, so we shall see.
There's apparently also a VAL version:
Unrustle_Thine_Jimmies
Members
- Mar 3, 2013
- 1,074
- 424
S&T VSS is their own design,as you can probably tell,the S&T VSS is sort of...wrong looking,such as the receiver cover not being stamped properly,receiver being too thick,stock is utterly wrong and among other things,they proper fire selection method is not replicated.
Then again,that does not really matter to the average nob, I expect waves of ''gawt ess and tee vee ess ess,how mak rushin dmr lodout?'' posts.
Echo1 re-branded the S&T as the ''IGOR''(Cringe) and they are selling it as part of the red star line.
I'd say there is no reason to get the S&T. The King Arms one is roughly the same price,has proper proportions and replications and seems to be build better. Not a fan of thee wood on the KA though.
Here's a comparison of the LCT VAL,King arms VSS, and S&T VSS.
Mainly showing for receiver dimensions. Don't really want to show the G&G since that one looks far too unfinished.
KA
LCT
S&T
Vidyaz.
KA
Then again,that does not really matter to the average nob, I expect waves of ''gawt ess and tee vee ess ess,how mak rushin dmr lodout?'' posts.
Echo1 re-branded the S&T as the ''IGOR''(Cringe) and they are selling it as part of the red star line.
I'd say there is no reason to get the S&T. The King Arms one is roughly the same price,has proper proportions and replications and seems to be build better. Not a fan of thee wood on the KA though.
Here's a comparison of the LCT VAL,King arms VSS, and S&T VSS.
Mainly showing for receiver dimensions. Don't really want to show the G&G since that one looks far too unfinished.
KA
LCT
S&T
Vidyaz.
KA
Last edited by a moderator:
Ian_Gere
Retired Moderator
- Apr 1, 2012
- 6,417
- 2,050
OK, well that idea went the way of the square wheel...
I was also looking at this Russian tuned one. Which looks very nice: steel and plywood goodness :wub: but is simply a V3 gearbox, not that orgasmatron that G&G are using - and it's £500 basic / £650 with the PSO scope and tune up.
I was also looking at this Russian tuned one. Which looks very nice: steel and plywood goodness :wub: but is simply a V3 gearbox, not that orgasmatron that G&G are using - and it's £500 basic / £650 with the PSO scope and tune up.
I notice that the stock on this one appears to be more horizontal than the KA one, closer to the S&T I'd say :blink:
Similar threads
