• Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.

    The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here

    If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here

DHL/UKMail - Bunch of useless *&^£%£$%

Bloody hell........

Escalate this any further and you will get a call from HRH The Queen any minute now ??
She might have the required clout to get to the bottom of this!

I believe my use of the word "theft" and suggestion that I get the local police involved put the wind up them... 

 
It's a grey area as to who actually owns the goods while they are in transit (if they are actually in transit, it could be a box of rocks for all you and DHL know, even if you have a tracking number).

I mean, you've paid for them, but your contract is with the seller, their contract is with the courier, and it's them that gets refunded, not you.

This isn't an excuse, it's a piss poor situation that I'd like to see rectified so that buyers / recipients have standing to take action against couriers.

 
Slow progress. 

DHL phoned today to say that the seller should now start the claims process. 

The depot were very reluctant to check the CCTV (seems suspicious to me), but when they eventually did they said that they couldn't see a parcel of that description going out. 

There's no exit scan from the depot, so all we have is the depot manager's word that there's no sign of it. He maintains that it went out on the trunk lorry to the distribution hub, but has no evidence to back this up. 
To be fair to them the CCTV has nothing to do with you.  It’s for them and potentially the police as evidence.

Not seeing “a parcel of that description” going out is not conclusive.   Thousands of parcels go in and out of depots daily. Is it really that distinguishable amongst many boxes?

It will take time, but your point of call is the sender.  But they can do nothing but agree on how long to wait and when to refund you 

The sender has a claim against DHL. They have lost the package

If they have sent it properly then they have the insurance cover to get a refund of postage costs and compensation for the lost item.

Ive been through it with lost & very late packages as both sender and recipient.  It all takes time

You may be eligible to claim via a 3rd party payment process, if so get the process initiated ASAP.  That does not go against the sender (other than the money being taken back off them) and doing so means they get back payment processing fees etc, it’s better to give a refund according to the proper processes, and it also documents correspondence 

DHL are right to refer back for the sender to initiate the claims process, you can refer back to  the time in the interim period that you ‘know’ that it is missing and that DHL have not been able to trace it, but it’s up to the sender if they refund you now or they wait until they get their compensation.  Your only method of forcing that any quicker if they want to wait is via your payment processing .... which will also take time if you have not already initiated it

 
To be fair to them the CCTV has nothing to do with you.  It’s for them and potentially the police as evidence.


I agree with that - but it has a lot to do with their own Customer Services department (who requested it), as it's one of their methods of tracking lost items. 

The seller has been good as gold and is sending my replacement AEG out today. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with that - but it has a lot to do with their own Customer Services department (who requested it), as it's one of their methods of tracking lost items. 

The seller has been good as gold and is sending my replacement AEG out today. 
That would make it an internal matter ... If I was the manager of customer services I wouldn’t be too keen on being too open about progress on checking CCTV.

There may be bad and good reasons for ‘reluctance’ to check the CCTV, for example were they asking the depot manager to check x hours worth of CCTV for a rectangular card board box?  Or the manager is getting a cut of stolen goods. 

Is there a customer services lost goods process recorded for their CCTV ... or is it in their security system.  

The parcel tags are part of goods tracking  

DHL will know if there is some form of pattern of lost parcels such as dodgy staff

 
Back
Top