SeniorSpaz87
Supporters
- May 24, 2014
- 1,786
- 873
Had a few people in the US ask me which I think is better - having no experience with these so figured id ask here.
-
Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.
The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here
If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here
AGM (Matrix) vs G&G MG42
- Thread starter SeniorSpaz87
- Start date
Adolf Hamster
Supporters
- Feb 1, 2018
- 7,057
- 2,229
not used the g&g but i'd wager the quality is better on it, plus unlike the agm it has a quick swap barrel (although maybe of limited utility in airsoft but still cool) but for pretty much triple the price you'd expect it to be much better.
i have the agm and whilst it's an imposing gun the materials are a bit lackluster in the reciever, i've fixed it by bolting in 2 big bars of steel on the inside which doesn't help the weight, the finish is just black paint which leaves shiny aluminium when it inevitable chips off.
the bipod is a bit annoying and floppy to work with, however it is at least pretty strong unlike on some other types like the m60.
i have the agm and whilst it's an imposing gun the materials are a bit lackluster in the reciever, i've fixed it by bolting in 2 big bars of steel on the inside which doesn't help the weight, the finish is just black paint which leaves shiny aluminium when it inevitable chips off.
the bipod is a bit annoying and floppy to work with, however it is at least pretty strong unlike on some other types like the m60.
Similar threads
