• Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.

    The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here

    If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here

GBBR/HPA New Law Issues?

Prisce

Supporters
Joined
Feb 9, 2017
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
190
First off this is not meant to be a scaremongering doom and gloom thread, I just think it needs to be out there for everyone to know.

So an acquaintance of mine( who doesn't use the Internet- old fart) runs a M4 GBBR and a few accessories, and after purchasing a few bits online(new reg and a gas tube I believe) he got a visit from the police.

I should say this guy has been running HPA a lot longer than I have been playing airsoft, so he's pretty clued up.

He explained to the police, who were apparently very friendly, that the pieces were for an airsoft gun, that adheres to the 1.3J new law and is controlled via a regulator.

The police said they would have to take it away to test as they believe that it is over the legal limit of 1.3J. Knowing he wasn't, he said sure, they took it away and some time passed and he got a phone call, apparently the gun was registering a hell of a lot higher than 1.3j and they were seizing it and starting charges for class 5 ownership etc

So after going straight down the station, having a long ass discussion he found that to test the rifle the whack the regulator to maximum and test it on that, because that's what "it could fire at". He explained to a guy at the station that the regulator locks it off, he's been using it for years and the sites can vouch it's never been used overpower etc

He got the charges dropped, but they did seize the rifle permanently.

Now I know there are a tonne of guys here who run HPA and was wondering if you have had any similar or totally different experiences regarding the new laws, and if anyone is more clued up than me and if he ever had a leg to stand on. 

He no longer runs HPA and is not arguing this with the police as he just can't be bothered.( Too old in my opinion, doesn't want the hassle)

 
It is why I am not venturing down the HPA route myself, although on bolt action rifles it isn't such an issue as they don't become a firearm if they go over the single action limit, they become an air rifle so not a problem. I'd not bother with HPA on a full auto with this stuff in the air at the moment.

 
Your car can go over the speed limit, it doesn't mean you are going to speed

hell you can get hpa air rifles that you can turn over 12lb/ft

No offence to the OP, but its funny that all these type of posts are by a friend.... I have yet to see this posted by an owner

 
Totally unenforceable nonsense that will - at best - apply to manufacturers. It's down to the courts to define what 'readily convertible' actually is, until then I'd be sceptical but frankly you could be waiting a while as we still don't have definitions for a lot of the VCRA stuff due to none of it being prosecuted. We might see insurance companies making that definition for site owners, but that would probably have happened by now if it was going to.

All in all, I wouldn't worry about it but of course there is a degree of uncertainty. Use a tournament lock for skirmishes just to keep site owners happy though for sure because people are unreasonably afraid of HPA because of a few twats.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shouldn't the greater concern here be over how the police got involved in the first place.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sure, if you want it to be.


Well, yeah, if a retailer or shipping company is reporting people to the authorities shouldn't airsoft players want to know that?

EDIT:

So an acquaintance of mine( who doesn't use the Internet- old fart) runs a M4 GBBR and a few accessories, and after purchasing a few bits online(new reg and a gas tube I believe) he got a visit from the police.


What wrong with this sentence? Does anyone else see it?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wonder if it was a real steel buffer tube?

 
Like I said, I didn't mean for this to do anything other than give people the heads up incase it happens to them. 

I only posted this hoping someone here may be able to shed a little light on the laws/subject so if anyone else gets caught they have some information they can use. 

Better still, is there any officers who could clear this up? 

 
Like I said, I didn't mean for this to do anything other than give people the heads up incase it happens to them. 

I only posted this hoping someone here may be able to shed a little light on the laws/subject so if anyone else gets caught they have some information they can use. 

Better still, is there any officers who could clear this up? 


Was the gun seized HPA or GBBR?

Do you know why they stopped the prosecution, if the guy was 'guilty'.

Also, I'm still a little unclear how someone which doesn't use the internet ordered online.

 
Apologies, I composed the article at 6:10 in the morning after a night out, guess I didn't make myself that clear.

It was HPA( I don't know enough about gas guns admittedly and wondered if the same problem could be found with GBBR) 

No, only met this guy once( hence acquaintance- not friend), and at the time I didn't think to ask, I can understand why you'd want to know that, if I see him again I shall ask.

That is and always will be my blonde moment, he buys through a friend over Facebook, I would presume he was an old friend, or he just buys for him. 

The guy in question doesn't buy from shops online, no idea why. He made this very clear when I spoke to him.

 
Apologies, I composed the article at 6:10 in the morning after a night out, guess I didn't make myself that clear.

It was HPA( I don't know enough about gas guns admittedly and wondered if the same problem could be found with GBBR) 

No, only met this guy once( hence acquaintance- not friend), and at the time I didn't think to ask, I can understand why you'd want to know that, if I see him again I shall ask.

That is and always will be my blonde moment, he buys through a friend over Facebook, I would presume he was an old friend, or he just buys for him. 

The guy in question doesn't buy from shops online, no idea why. He made this very clear when I spoke to him.


So an acquaintance of mine( who doesn't use the Internet- old fart) runs a M4 GBBR and a few accessories, and after purchasing a few bits online(new reg and a gas tube I believe) he got a visit from the police.


That's not an acquaintance, that's gossip.

All credibility demolished:

/thread.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
 He may have been feeding me a pack of lies, I couldn't tell you, hence why I asked in my original post if anyone had any similar experiences, and why in my second post I asked if anyone could clear it up. 

By definition(image attached so you don't have to search it up) he is an acquaintance. It may be gossip, I haven't said anywhere it is fact, only what I have been told, which is the reason I posted here, using a question mark in the title to me is evidence enough I wasn't sure about this. 

So so if you haven't got anything useful to add or contribute, please refrain from commenting. I tend to agree with you it's bollocks. 

If you believed it was bollocks, a simple " I have never had this problem, or don't know anyone who has, but in my OPINION it's bollocks" would have been suffice.

Not meaning to get snooty, but you have diverted from the original post and are just  commenting on me and not the topic.

View attachment 24271

 
So so if you haven't got anything useful to add or contribute, please refrain from commenting.


Took the words right outa my mouth.

Not meaning to get snooty, but you have diverted from the original post and are just  commenting on me and not the topic.


That's right, I am.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's maybe calm it down just a little bit and stick to addressing the OP.

 
I know with air guns there is no set definition on the format the tests the police will do and could adjust settings and use other ammunition whilst testing. The justification for this is that the wording from the legislation of power limits uses a very ambiguous word "capable" yet does not define this. In general these days on air guns any adjustment will be hidden or restricted so not to be bale to go over. For example regulators will normally be internally shimmed so the only way to adjust them is to dismantle them. They will also always be set below the limit so if another average pellet is used it would still be below the limit. 

 
OK, so to drag the thread kicking and screaming back nearer the topic....

Are there not fixed flow/pressure restrictors available that can ensure the rig CAN'T deliver more than the legal limit?

 
Back
Top