Eye pro for M1 style helmets

K

kasaran

Members
Joined
Feb 4, 2018
Messages
644
Reaction score
101
Would like to go full on 'nam more often, but my prefered eyepro protudes too far from my face to fit (Bolle x800i).  My older set (ASG Strike Protective Tactical Dual Lens) fit, though arnt the best for fog control.

I'd rather something more in the style of the Bolle, but would need to be slim to fit under the lid.  any recommendations or experience with eyepro and this helmet?

 
kasaran said:
Would like to go full on 'nam more often, but my prefered eyepro protudes too far from my face to fit (Bolle x800i).  My older set (ASG Strike Protective Tactical Dual Lens) fit, though arnt the best for fog control.

I'd rather something more in the style of the Bolle, but would need to be slim to fit under the lid.  any recommendations or experience with eyepro and this helmet?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Though not very nam style mesh would be the best for preventing fog 

Which there’s a fair number of slim line options though they’re no good if you’re wearing glasses 

after looking at the goggles used in the time period I think these styles would be either closest or could fit well enough 

though they both say for airsoft neither state a bb rating so if you do decide to get one from the links I’d advise you giving them a test by shooting them at a decently close range with a your high fps replica (480 fps at 5 meters is what most mesh goggles are rated for)

Demeras Tactics Mesh Goggles Headband Googles Cabon Dteel Outdoor Goggles for Hunting Airsoft Protective Gear(Military Color) https://amzn.eu/d/95oYhmK

Airsoft Paintball Goggles, X800 Military Tactical Helmet Goggles UV-400 Eye Protective Motorbike Cycling Glasses with 3 Interchangeable Lens & Camo Case for Running Skiing Fishing Hunting Wargame https://amzn.eu/d/ej3glmA

View attachment 107807

View attachment 107808

 
Last edited:
Rogerborg said:
[citation needed]
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
https://www.wiseworksafe.com/blog/view/understanding-en-166-personal-eye-protection-standard
 

this is explains the eye protection ratings 

And all the mesh goggles I have that are from nuprol are marked with EN 1731 F


·    EN 1731:2006: Personal eye protection – Mesh eye and face protectors

F is rated for a 0.89g 6mm bb shot at 45 m/s (about 147.64fps)

that’s what the ratings mean though the goggles came with instructions which stated that it was 480fps at 5 meters though did not indicate weight 

I’ve been using my dmr which shoots close to that velocity with 0.20 and the range I go to is happy with that rating system 

I fire 5 shot’s into the same lense around the same spot and then check for cracks or dents 

 
Last edited:
Iguana tactical said:
https://www.wiseworksafe.com/blog/view/understanding-en-166-personal-eye-protection-standard
 

this is explains the eye protection ratings 

And all the mesh goggles I have that are from nuprol are marked with EN 1731 F


·    EN 1731:2006: Personal eye protection – Mesh eye and face protectors

F is rated for a 0.89g 6mm bb shot at 45 m/s (about 147.64fps)

that’s what the ratings mean though the goggles came with instructions which stated that it was 480fps at 5 meters though did not indicate weight 

I’ve been using my dmr which shoots close to that velocity with 0.20 and the range I go to is happy with that rating system 

I fire 5 shot’s into the same lense around the same spot and then check for cracks or dents 
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
0.89g at 147.64fps = 0.90J, which is nowhere near 480fps at 5m with any BB you are going to use in airsoft.  0.20g at 480fps = 2.13J.  I would not trust anything printed in the instructions for Nuprol goggles.

Anyway, you still have not demonstrated that this comment is accurate: 480 fps at 5 meters is what most mesh goggles are rated for.


 

 
Iguana tactical said:
https://www.wiseworksafe.com/blog/view/understanding-en-166-personal-eye-protection-standard
 

this is explains the eye protection ratings 
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...


Thanks, we're familiar with the quirks of EN 166.

Iguana tactical said:
And all the mesh goggles I have that are from nuprol are marked with EN 1731 F
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...


And that's not EN 166.

My Brave-fu isn't finding a "liberated" copy of EN 1731 F, so I have no idea what test projectiles or energies it claims to stop.  However, I can find forestry helmets with fine mesh that claims to meet EN 1731 F, and I wouldn't trust that for airsoft use.

It's reassuring that you have tested yours, but 2J of 0.2g isn't the same as 2J of 0.46g.  Don't get me wrong, I use mesh myself, and DIY at that, using 3.5mm hole / 4.5mm pitch 1mm thick stainless hex.  I'd be interested to hear how that (literally) measures up to the Nuprols.

 
Guest Iguana tactical said:
https://www.wiseworksafe.com/blog/view/understanding-en-166-personal-eye-protection-standard
 

this is explains the eye protection ratings 

And all the mesh goggles I have that are from nuprol are marked with EN 1731 F
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...


Rogerborg said:
Thanks, we're familiar with the quirks of EN 166.

And that's not EN 166.

My Brave-fu isn't finding a "liberated" copy of EN 1731 F, so I have no idea what test projectiles or energies it claims to stop.  However, I can find forestry helmets with fine mesh that claims to meet EN 1731 F, and I wouldn't trust that for airsoft use.

It's reassuring that you have tested yours, but 2J of 0.2g isn't the same as 2J of 0.46g.  Don't get me wrong, I use mesh myself, and DIY at that, using 3.5mm hole / 4.5mm pitch 1mm thick stainless hex.  I'd be interested to hear how that (literally) measures up to the Nuprols.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...




EN 1731 has been withdrawn as a standard and replaced by EN ISO 16321. eLibrary copies can be read for a day for a bout a fiver https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/0558b211-7e30-44c2-a924-480c91d5dea4/en-iso-16321-3-2022

Worth mentioning that this standard specifically excludes mesh face protectors or goggles for sports use.

 
Rogerborg said:
Nice one!

Oh... "[Robustness] testing shall be done in accordance with 3.2 of EN 168:2001."  Gaa, I'm out.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I can access it! (Status is ‘under review’)

Though my access is to BS EN168:2002 which also has pages marked EN168:2001 …… and of course the impact testing paragraphs 3 & 9 refer to EN166 …..

Just in case a copy of  EN168 is out there somewhere it’s a 36 page document 

 
this derailed... I'd still like an on topic answer.  Though I should add that im not a fan of mesh goggles or shooting glasses. 

Does no one know of any full seal eye pro that isnt mesh that would work with an M1 style helmet?

 
kasaran said:
this derailed... I'd still like an on topic answer.  Though I should add that im not a fan of mesh goggles or shooting glasses. 

Does no one know of any full seal eye pro that isnt mesh that would work with an M1 style helmet?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...


I'd say try the Namsoft pages on FB, they will probably have more direct experience. There aren't going to be any goggles from Bolle, ESS, Revision etc that are designed to work with an M1 because that's just not a thing. Maybe a set of ESS Advancers (based on being similar shapewise to the ASG ones you mentioned. Otherwise, what about a FogEx blower attached somewhere inconspicuous?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top