Pompeyairsofter36
Members
- Mar 16, 2015
- 17
- 4
I'm thinking of getting a G&G TR16 series gun but don't know which one to get.
-
Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.
The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here
If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here
What gun from G&G should I get?
- Thread starter Pompeyairsofter36
- Start date
P
PT247
Guest
P
PT247
Guest
No idea how good it'll be but looks pretty cool!
jay83
Members
- Jul 19, 2013
- 498
- 70
That looks amazing. G & G are trying to take it to the next limit. I had a top tech was a really well made gun.
Only thing is it justb looks like more stuff that can go wrong.
Pompeyairsofter36
Members
- Mar 16, 2015
- 17
- 4
- Thread starter
- #6
TacMaster
Members
- Dec 3, 2012
- 1,888
- 848
My worry is that with this system, one of G&G's main selling points (the cost effective Combat machine rifles) will be rendered invalid due to increased production costs and therefore a higher RRP.
If G&G have a simple, cheap way of making those complex components without scrimping on quality, then hats off to them; they'll retain the CM range's lower price and the rifles will be much more fun to use, and much cooler than the normal AEGs in the G&G range.
However it does seem as if a lot of problems will arise from over complicating a simple AEG. The split gearbox and quick change spring system should be fine, so should the cocking handle and bolt stop assembly- it's the electronics I'm worried about. G&G's MOSFET switches in their Gen 3 Top Techs have a notorious reputation, although I think they only blew because idiots slapped an 11.1V LiPo into them when they were only really designed for lower voltages. They are integrated systems anyway, and not aftermarket 'FET quality.
If G&G have a simple, cheap way of making those complex components without scrimping on quality, then hats off to them; they'll retain the CM range's lower price and the rifles will be much more fun to use, and much cooler than the normal AEGs in the G&G range.
However it does seem as if a lot of problems will arise from over complicating a simple AEG. The split gearbox and quick change spring system should be fine, so should the cocking handle and bolt stop assembly- it's the electronics I'm worried about. G&G's MOSFET switches in their Gen 3 Top Techs have a notorious reputation, although I think they only blew because idiots slapped an 11.1V LiPo into them when they were only really designed for lower voltages. They are integrated systems anyway, and not aftermarket 'FET quality.
Last edited by a moderator:
P
PT247
Guest
would need a recoil mechanism in the buffer tube imo to be a proper contender for me, could still run a quick change spring out the end of the stock.
ImTriggerHappy
Supporters
- Feb 25, 2015
- 5,374
- 2,228
Would be better just getting a Tm recoil and just chucking a mosfet in it. No quick change spring maybe but everything else is better.
P
PT247
Guest
I don't like the TM recoils, the PTS ERGs are far better IMO. I just think manufacturers should open their eyes to the recoil guns as they are so much fun to shoot compared to a standard AEG.
Mack
Members
- Jun 24, 2012
- 1,155
- 1,030
Quick enough in the TM Recoils, Only need to take the buffer tube off if you have already upgraded the original spring.
Undieing_Lust
Members
- May 16, 2014
- 225
- 132
Wow that looks pretty epic.
Similar threads
