Right, whilst this news is about 2 weeks old, I just wanted to know what you guys think of this -
http://www.latimes.com/business/technology...0,6797956.story
Me? I'm kind of torn on the story.
On the one hand -
His cat was already dead
He didn't kill his cat, and doing this isn't going to physically harm his cat
Plenty of people have their dead pets stuffed to remember them (although I'll admit that I don't think this is as 'popular' as it once was)
He isn't screwing the cat, nor is he eating it
It was his cat.
On the other hand -
He's done it for modern art
He's turned a cat into a frickin' helicopter.
So what do you guys think of this? I'll grant you I think it's a tad on the strange side, but other than that - I'm not sure.
http://www.latimes.com/business/technology...0,6797956.story
Me? I'm kind of torn on the story.
On the one hand -
His cat was already dead
He didn't kill his cat, and doing this isn't going to physically harm his cat
Plenty of people have their dead pets stuffed to remember them (although I'll admit that I don't think this is as 'popular' as it once was)
He isn't screwing the cat, nor is he eating it
It was his cat.
On the other hand -
He's done it for modern art
He's turned a cat into a frickin' helicopter.
So what do you guys think of this? I'll grant you I think it's a tad on the strange side, but other than that - I'm not sure.