• Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.

    The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here

    If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here

The future of airsoft law.

As i read your second ParaGraph Loydy i Had my heart in my throat and my hand's clasped together!

i Also Agree with that but i also see why other's despise people that think this and that it is seen as Harsh and actually potentially Damaging to getting new Blood in and Playing.

But i Totally whole Heartedly Agree that we should be Able to Look up a UKARA No. Ourself's and check the Supplied address is Correct because i have had RIF's Sold to me without so much as a query about my Defence!.

 
Hmm, interesting debate. I must admit I have often wondered about a few of the issues here.

Personally I don't think much of VCRA, it strikes of half baked legislation from people who are scared of, well, us. Not sure why but after getting rid of all the real guns (not such a bad thing) they move on to the plastic ones with a law that means its OK to buy a more dangerous air pistol (which looks fully real) but a plastic one that cant hurt you is painted mad colours. Then call it the Violent Crime Reduction Act :blink:

So I would like others like to see that anomaly sorted out, all weapons designed to look like 'Real Steel' firearms should be under the same rules regardless of being above or below a certain FPS or shape of projectile (Paintball for example). Real steel should be defined as weapons covered by Firearms laws with specific exemptions for Air Rifle's and Air Pistols that don't replicate more powerful 'Real' guns. Yes that's a fun one to legislate, but less of a mess than the current descriptions which would see a broom handle almost classed as a RIF.

This would mean that paintball M16's, Air pistol P99's, etc. are now RIF's and subject to rules on purchase. So you would add a valid reason to own them to the rules they are already under as air weapons, face to face, etc. You also now can extend UKARA to a wider group with new defences of paintball skirmisher, target / practical shooter, and the discussed airsoft parent...

I would also like to see IF's downgraded in law, it makes no sense to have the same penalty for IFs and RIFs when the purpose of an IF is to ensure everyone knows its not 'real'. It would also be good if people run about with RIF's in a dangerous way were prosecuted under firearms laws, which already allow for this (its the threat / fear, not the weapon or not that is the illegal act). We could then do away with RIF/IF in public laws or just make them a warning / misdemeanour's not major crime.

We could also do with sensible guidelines on transport so we can deal with the jobsworths and scare mongers out there. Personally I hate the idea of orange tips, but a barrel plug with flag like paintball uses may be a good idea. Although the current advice of a proper gun bag makes passing through public areas pretty safe.

It would also be nice to have RIF's at airsoft level legally defined as toys in such a way that airlines and postal services cant keep discriminating against us by saying they are firearms.

 
I think the Whole Parent's Thing is utter Crap unless they go into the Shop or Site and Show they Understand the Risks if that was to happen then i would support it and support getting rid of Two-Tone's aswell otherwise we'll just see what a few member's may remember from halfway throuygh the year when a youtube channel popped up with Kid's Playing with airsoft's in the Street with OUT Eye Pro and Damaging other folk's Thing's and they even thought that the road they were playing on was Private Yet it was Obviously a Public Estate!!!
Craig - If you had a joint junior/parent membership then it should improve controls. You would still have to be over 18 to buy a gun but now you would also have to be a member of a registered club. I would expect the club to want the same degree of identification for the parent as they require for an over 18 who has completed the skirmish requirement. Part of the membership process would be for the club to explain the rules/law and if they could refuse membership just as they can with anyone now.

At the moment anyone over 18 can buy a two-tone and gift it a kid. They do not have had to attend any airsoft skirmishes or even have any intention of doing so. This is what leads to the youtube issue you mentioned. The two-tone does not even have to be a cheap plastic gun - for just a few £ you can have any RIF painted and it would probably not be that difficult to remove the paint (not tried it and know it would be illegal). If two-tones were banned then the membership route would be the only way of buying an airsoft gun and that should help with having the sport more widely recognised/accepted.

 
maybe they could impose a ban on allowing a RIF to be converted into a IF or put a cap on the power range of IF's say 150fps and must be made of say 90% plastic that way it would be a toy also up the % needing to be a bright colour to say 75% that way people would be abit more likely to wait there 3 games or pay for a site membership than just spend £10- £20 getting a rif two toned

 
i think if it was a law you should have to renew every 3 years,every years a ballache

 
Back
Top