-
Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.
The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here
If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here
Saying hey from Texas
- Thread starter Nex
- Start date
Deva
Admin
- Sep 5, 2008
- 4,164
- 183
Not really - don't know when you last looked into it.
The government requires skirmishers to have a valid defence for buying RIF's. The post popular scheme for getting a defence is the UKARA.
You can still purchase without, but it will be a 2-tone gun (sprayed 50% in a bright colour).
If you are under 18 you can't do any of the above.
The government requires skirmishers to have a valid defence for buying RIF's. The post popular scheme for getting a defence is the UKARA.
You can still purchase without, but it will be a 2-tone gun (sprayed 50% in a bright colour).
If you are under 18 you can't do any of the above.
Last edited by a moderator:
JerseyRider
Members
- Oct 22, 2009
- 1,289
- 15
Welcome 
Nex
Members
- Oct 8, 2010
- 62
- 4
- Thread starter
- #4
Yeah I read around a little and have a basic understanding of the UKARA and the laws it fights against.
Its also illegal to purchase an RIF under 18 over here. Normally to just get one, people get others over 18 to purchase the weapon for them.
Is there some kind of penalty if say someone with a UKARA defense purchases a non-two tone RIF and then sells it to someone without a defense?
Its also illegal to purchase an RIF under 18 over here. Normally to just get one, people get others over 18 to purchase the weapon for them.
Is there some kind of penalty if say someone with a UKARA defense purchases a non-two tone RIF and then sells it to someone without a defense?
JerseyRider
Members
- Oct 22, 2009
- 1,289
- 15
Its up to the Shop which the person attemped to buy one from i guess even so as long as he didnt walk out the shop with a RiF he can only be told about the law
however i the shop sells him the RiF its more there fault then the buyer because the buyer might not know about the law but the shop must if there selling RiFs so it would be the shop getting in trouble more then the buyer
however i the shop sells him the RiF its more there fault then the buyer because the buyer might not know about the law but the shop must if there selling RiFs so it would be the shop getting in trouble more then the buyer
Deva
Admin
- Sep 5, 2008
- 4,164
- 183
We have rules that the seller must check the buyers defence, obviously if I was to find out that this had not taken place then I would take the necessary measures to stop the sale and report it. You can see the rules we use if you go into a sale section and look at the 'Read First' thread.
Similar threads
