ScoobySnacks
Members
- Jul 20, 2012
- 264
- 0
Actually you're BOTH wrong. The law ACTUALLY states that the person selling the RIF is committing a defence, unless the person buying it is one of several groups of people who it is legal to sell to.
Confusing I know, but it's an important difference. You cannot commit an offence by buying a RIF (as long as you are over 18), it is the seller who commits the offence, and hence it is up to the seller to decide what level of proof they will accept. UKARA is one method of proving the defence, there are many others.
Confusing I know, but it's an important difference. You cannot commit an offence by buying a RIF (as long as you are over 18), it is the seller who commits the offence, and hence it is up to the seller to decide what level of proof they will accept. UKARA is one method of proving the defence, there are many others.