-
Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.
The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here
If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here
Load-Out / Loadout Picture topic
- Thread starter Nutster
- Start date
Ian_Gere
Retired Moderator
- Apr 1, 2012
- 6,417
- 2,050
^^Pic's not loading, Russ 
In that picture they look way more acceptable than those Begadi opfor objects which some on here attempted to claim were in fact a reasonable choice of apparel in which to airsoft, on the grounds that they were based on Rhodesian camouflage.
In that picture they look way more acceptable than those Begadi opfor objects which some on here attempted to claim were in fact a reasonable choice of apparel in which to airsoft, on the grounds that they were based on Rhodesian camouflage.
...I think we can conclusively put this issue to bed:
Rhodesian camo = gear that may well help to conceal people in lush vegetation
vs
BE-X Opfor camo = gear which may well help to conceal people at a Magnum PI convention
Last edited by a moderator:
Nickona
Members
- May 30, 2011
- 2,339
- 220
I see what you mean, its a little more red IRL but also you have to remember, especially with African stuff, is that the colours can vary a lot depending on year and manufacturer.
Also camopedia doesn't say reddish brown and from pics of it in use it doesn't look that reddish. But like I said it varies a lot depending on where and when it was made
Haha, I was partially considering some Bengadi OpFor but for the price its not worth it. Its about £35 + P&P for trousers. My Rhodies trousers were £42.25 all in!^^Pic's not loading, Russ
In that picture they look way more acceptable than those Begadi opfor objects which some on here attempted to claim were in fact a reasonable choice of apparel in which to airsoft, on the grounds that they were based on Rhodesian camouflage.
...I think we can conclusively put this issue to bed:Rhodesian camo = gear that may well help to conceal people in lush vegetationvsBE-X Opfor camo = gear which may well help to conceal people at a Magnum PI convention
It would be alright for a generic terrorist/merc loadout but trying to say its good because its like Rhodesian camo is a bit of a stretch
This is my newest loadout, it's a PROPER A-tacs shirt, flyye chest right, deluxe Fast helmet, Jack pyke glasses and some green cargo trousers from the local surplus the AEG is a jls F2000, hopefully I can replacement the AEG soon 
Sorry if the pictures are showing the wrong way up, doing this from a phone.
View attachment 10044
View attachment 10050
Sorry if the pictures are showing the wrong way up, doing this from a phone.View attachment 10044
View attachment 10050
Ian_Gere
Retired Moderator
- Apr 1, 2012
- 6,417
- 2,050
Yeah, those stens are still going for a oner. It's sooooooo tempting. But I'm in negotiations with a Russian bloke to get a complete all season afganka that will actually fit me properly and that's probably going to rush me one and a half... but it is the outer jacket and trousers which are for summer on there own and the quilted liners, with fur collar, plus the lot tailored, so if the deal comes together I won't feel spanked so much as wallet-shy for a while.
Shame because I could proper go for a loadout like yours, Russ, or an RM Commando one. Actually a Maquis loadout would be a lot of fun too.
Shame because I could proper go for a loadout like yours, Russ, or an RM Commando one. Actually a Maquis loadout would be a lot of fun too.
adam bussey
Members
- Sep 24, 2012
- 656
- 62
Nickona
Members
- May 30, 2011
- 2,339
- 220
Cheeky vimto
Members
- Sep 6, 2013
- 797
- 217
