Thanks, would you be able to direct to the specific part(s) of legislation that prohibits either the private use of a tank without the RHO mark or the transporting a tank without an RHO mark by car? I haven't been able to find these?
It’s quite a hefty read, but there shouldn’t be prohibition of private use/filling/transporting
There are parts of the legislation that will refer to private use, but as you’ve found is a hard read
The bottom line is your Pi is effectively the same standard, (there was a slight difference between Pi & DOT), and manufacturers aren’t making different cylinders for different regions, but manufacturing to meet/exceed all standards and submitting for standards testing to qualify for the markings
I would be more concerned that a cylinder is in serviceable condition, in date etc - but when cylinder checking for an event I would look for the key points of UK legal, in date, no danger signs - and I’m not doing any events so won’t be comparing Pi dates
The "The Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2021" link mentions "manufacturer, importer, or distributor" and the DfT Guidance for 'Placing transportable pressure equipment on the market in Great Britain" says it's "about the rules for placing transportable pressure equipment on the market in Great Britain from 1 January 2023." And specifies "Placing on the GB market’ means the first supply of TPE for distribution or use in Great Britain in the course of a commercial or public service activity, whether in return for payment or free of charge.".
I might have missed a section from one of the links (or from elsewhere) or be misinterpretating, but I would take this to mean the llinked legislation/guidance applys to businesses and entities selling, renting or loaning TPE rather than to individual airsofters using or transporting tanks?
Yes - those would apply to the importers & sale
There will be cylinders on the shelves that had preceded the changeover, and also may be some imported post changeover in ignorance
(Quite a few post Brexit standards regulations have established EU standards as valid, but they didn’t for cylinders)
The bottom line is whether or not it will affect you in being able to use a cylinder on site at the fill station or to play, and potentially whether it impacts upon getting a hydro test (not particularly worth the cost for an aluminium cylinder)
A UK hydro tester should not permit you to test a wrongly dated Pi as they are licenced, but I don’t know what level that sites are checking
…………..
As per the original post with the flow chart (which I disagree with due to over simplification) sites have been made aware and staff ought to be checking cylinders before filling (they should do so anyway)
Whether or not they do check, and whether or not the checker knows anything beyond what they usually see can vary widely
(Note my comment about a player I know, that I first met at one of our events when I refused use of his US cylinder - and loaned him mine for the day - he more recently pointed out that only I and two venues ever checked him until he retired it)
……………..
Back in the day when I began playing there was a blind eye turned to the use of US DOT cylinders in the UK. Partly with most sites running CO2 systems and players getting HPA, filling from personal scuba cylinders. (So if you didn’t use their fill station they ignored your cylinder)
As more HPA fill systems spread across sites, blind eyes and bad habits occurred - including under age self fills
This came to a head when there was a flash fill explosion on a site in the South . The knee jerk reaction was to blame the specialist ultra light design and it harmed a manufacturers reputation, but it was found to be an unregulated fast fill combined with an unknown players poor maintenance and oil contamination
That sorted the tournament world for years, but they seemed to forget years later slipping in awareness when the scenario world adopted those standards of checking and awareness training.