How to get permission to play airsoft in derelict/unused buildings?

[Jambo88]

Have you tried running on sand for an extended period?

Yes its a brilliant workout.

 

[Airsoftn1nja]

Found it fun reading all your replies to each other I just want to pop in and say I actually ran an Airsoft site I started up with some friends 

The way you would need to do this is to treat it as a business and just launch it you wouldn't need to worry about paying loads of tax if you don't make profit so if you could show that all the money collected on a "gameday" was used to cover your businesses bills and non was taken for profit you would be fine

In terms of insurances its alot easier to find a woodland and get it risk assessed and maintained than it is with an indoor site or a site with more buildings, you would also need to write out waivers nullifying yourself from any blame of injury and explain that a safety brief was given at the start of the day to highlight these risks.

you can insure yourself under outdoor activities/recreational or something kind of sports insurance 

With pyros id recommend going for only impact grenades and no actual pyrotechnics that make a flame.

I understand this post is very old but id be interested to hear back from you to see if you did ever find a way to make this work 

 

[Rogerborg]

you would also need to write out waivers nullifying yourself from any blame of injury

Section 65 of the Consumer Right Act 2015,.

(1) A trader cannot by a term of a consumer contract or by a consumer notice exclude or restrict liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.

(2) Where a term of a consumer contract, or a consumer notice, purports to exclude or restrict a trader's liability for negligence, a person is not to be taken to have voluntarily accepted any risk merely because the person agreed to or knew about the term or notice.

 

[LMKipper]

I always assumed the bit where you sign away your rights was rubbish. Same as when you sign 'I am fit and able to participate in XYZ' - any lawyer would shred it in seconds.

 

[Jamsandwich]

The Act does specify "from negligence" though.

I assume the waivers are mainly there to protect the site from people tripping over twigs and hurting their ankles rather than harm caused by dangerous onsite practices / dodgy crumbling walls etc.  So they do have a purpose for protecting the site management while limiting those protections to ensure customer safety isn't ignored.

 

[Rogerborg]

The Act does specify "from negligence" though.

Somewhat redundantly. If there's no negligence, there's little prospect of a claim succeeding.

I assume the waivers are mainly there to protect the site from people tripping over twigs and hurting their ankles

The waiver doesn't do that, the informed acceptance of specific unavoidable risks does.  These are two different things.  The usual waffle about unconditionally absolving the site of any liability is just wasted words.  I'd rather they used that space be more specific about risks, and who is responsible for mitigating them, phrased as "We will" and "You will".  Passive voice introduces ambiguity.

For example: Before entering the safe zone, you will remove the magazine from all your guns including pistols, fire shots into the ground until they are clear, and present them for inspection if asked.

If this sounds unnecessarily pedantic, it's because it doesn't matter, until it really matters, and suddenly what's plain as a pikestaff to the plaintiff's lawyer is utter balderdash to the defendant's.

For an example of getting it wrong, one of my locals says "If you show up in trainers or unacceptable footwear, you will not be permitted to play."

Daft thing to say, as it creates a duty of care on the site that didn't previously exist. ?‍

 

[Tommikka]

If this sounds unnecessarily pedantic, it's because it doesn't matter, until it really matters, and suddenly what's plain as a pikestaff to the plaintiff's lawyer is utter balderdash to the defendant's.

?‍

Stating the obvious as you already know this, but just reinforcing your statement …..

There’s no such thing as pedantic on a form once it arrives in court.  It’s either stated on the form or it isn’t

For example: Before entering the safe zone, you will remove the magazine from all your guns including pistols, fire shots into the ground until they are clear, and present them for inspection if asked.

?‍

Side remark …. The first time we ran an Airsoft game as players were being herded back to the safe zone I was sat on a table at the entrance/exit waiting to head out and reset / lay out props for the next objective.  The Airsoft marshals were calling out the instructions to make safe before entering the safe zone etc

So players were doing the right thing, magazine out, fire off anything left in the chamber etc

But then seeing me sat there as the first handful pass me holding up for inspection etc 

I particularly liked those who after discharging and clearing in front of an Airsoft marshall then paused to queue up to one by one give the paintball events organiser a clear confirmation that they have a safe RIF

 

[Dogsbody100]

I looked at doing this myself some time ago. There was a Debenhams in a local shopping mall that had closed and was almost perfect for a CQB site.

After some research it seems that it would have ended up as a full time job and as already mentioned would also have been requiring a complete health and safety assessment amongst many other things.

Bottom line was that unless I was willing to devote all my spare time, cash and attention it would have mutated into a massive failure at best and a raging court case at worst.

That said I really would love to do it one day but as things stand its not feasible.

After all that I can't honestly see how a temporary site could be set up and made workable in today's litigation heavy world.

I do wish the OP best of luck all the same. 

 

[ruskitseller]

Probably easier to do it using woodland. You can use the land registry and pay £3 to find out who owns land and approach the owner. I am sure there are other steps regarding insurance, but I have played private events before where there is no insurance and you sign a self disclaimer. Not sure of the legality of that nowadays and that was over 6 years ago. 

Cheers 

 

[Rogerborg]

I have played private events before where there is no insurance and you sign a self disclaimer. Not sure of the legality of that nowadays and that was over 6 years ago. 

Fine as long as it's on properly private land, with the owner's express permission, and nothing goes wrong.  Even if it does, if Alice shoots out Bob's eye though negligence, then there's a direct claim between those parties, and it's Alice's problem if she has no liability cover in place.

However, random members of the public can wander on, and someone who's lost the ability to earn money is going to go after the deepest pockets they can find, whether it's Alice's, whoever formed the contract with the landowner, or the landowner themselves.

Note that whether you're getting paid or not isn't relevant. Vowles vs Evans and the Welsh Rugby Union established that even an unpaid volunteer referee can be liable if they fail in their duty of care.