You can't say the war in Iraq or Afghanistan is the same. Nazi Germany was a genuine threat to the UK while saddam and afghan farmers were never a threat to us.
No Germany was not a threat to us - it is well documented Hitler did not seek conflict with Britain as he saw similarities to Germany
Also the links from certain members of Royal family - we was at that time regarded as no threat to Germany.....
How long that may have lasted - who knows ???
Maybe if Germany had aquired most of the French fleet they may have a strong reason and fleet to cross the channel
(hence we blew the f*ck out of french fleet soon after Paris fell to Germany - no wonder the french hate us)
All wars/conflicts are a waste of lives, time & money - if the human race didn't have the selfish greed gene and its ability to $hit on people
then there would be far less conflicts - We have entered into numerous conflicts over the centuries
the more recent ones may not have been wisest decisions - but we are screwed whatever we do.......
In some conflicts the West - US, UK Europe etc.... if we don't get involved we are accused of doing nothing or turning our backs
If we do offer to support or assist we risk provoking situations or making matters worse....
Hindsight is a wonderful thing to look back and pass judgement - maybe the west should of left Saddam Gadafii & f*ck knows who else in charge
The whole middle East is a mess and very doubt if any real democracy will ever work coz they are so used to a dictatorship to keep them in line
But as we know - if there wasn't oil out there - the west really wouldn't give a f*ck about it so much
Again all about selfish greed & a sprinkle of wishing to control others - that is where a lot of wars have come from
The rest of wars over history were about religion or politics - 2 subjects that certainly ain't worth a w@nk or losing ya life over
This country/UK has made judgements - some right - some very wrong in making a stance
it is a fine difficult line to walk - but think most of the judgements were deemed to be the right decisions made at the time
Politicians are certainly not perfect - neither are the public - wish more difficult decisions were subject to a vote by UK citizens
So yeah - why not let people decide on Europe rather than being TOLD to stay in Europe
If there was a major conflict issue - hopefully they could at very least gauge if Syria was in best interest or not
Or do we do little to intervene, or do we worth with devil we know to maybe rid IS - well doubt if that will happen
but reduce IS by working with the lesser of the two evils - a tough call or bury head in sand
I do not have the answers - but I trust/hope the elected goverment to listen and CONTINUE to listen to the people who appointed them
If they are not sure - then admit that and seek advice or UK vote etc....
to me that shows they are working for the majority of UK and giving the people some power back to make decisions etc....
Obviously this is a lot harder than what I said above but you do wonder why us stupid UK lot aren't kept better informed
(then we wouldn't be so stupid maybe), but also - yeah why didn't we have a vote on the middle east
why don't we have a vote on Europe ?????
somewhere there is a workable balance but Tories are saying well yeah maybe vote on Europe
UKIP - say wtf lets vote on this sooner rather than later - why haven't we had this vote already ??
Rest of them - NO WE ARE STAYING IN EUROPE - yeah some "democracy"
I am trying to stay out this coz I understand we all have different views and I do not seek to change anybody's own views
just now n then feel the need to express my own views but do not wish to enter into any rows or long drawn out debates
very little will change - opinions or politics but do feel a vote on Europe is a good way to settle it
plus controls on immigrantion does not mean I am a member of the local KKK ffs
just makes sense we need to make cuts and reductions in all areas if we are still in the $hit a bit and want to try and get out of it