Well PT, unfortunately I have reason to know a good deal more about psychology, psychiatry, and indeed sociology, than i wish to - it's a bit like a master baker watching someone else master bake and then being obliged to join in... the resulting biscuit cannot be simply enjoyed for its flavour and texture, there's a whole raft of decision making, reasons, and possibilities that go into each nuance; basically there is no such thing as an innocent master baker.
As you have noted, I'm also an accomplished rhetorician. I would be lying if I claimed that flexing those mental muscles gives me no pleasure, however a quick recap will disabuse you of any suspicion that I am attempting to big up ma chest at your expense, for I have said nothing at all about you personally. That would be to commit the sin of ad hominem, which, to my mind at least, is way worse than allowing boots to wear out faster than need be for laziness' sake. I have stated that such laziness is morally comparable to other more commonly recognised culpable behaviour, to wit receiving stolen goods, however I have not even resorted to the common "lazy bugger", have I?
I get it that one or even several hundred pairs of boots are a very small item in the grand scheme of things, but let us for a moment consider the hypothetical journey one pair may have taken before reaching an airsoft site:
Our protagonists are deployed and find themselves worn by a young soldier in the desert. They have just encountered a camel, which is fortuitous for the soldier and his fellow platoon members because not thirty minutes previously their sergeant had noted that they had little to do and driven them out into the middle of nowhere and ordered them to pick up and carry the huge pile of straw they found loafing there. Naturally each man would have liked to reduce his own burden by as much as possible, but they all realised that there is some unknown limit to the amount a camel can carry. Let's cut a long story short and simply ask, when the camel's back breaks, whom is more culpable, those soldiers who loaded their share of what seemed a conservative estimate of what the beast could in fact carry, or those who thought "Out of all the straws going on that camel, the extra few I'm going to put on it don't matter." and packed the camel with enough to reduce their own burden to a comfortable weight?