Liam Porter
Supporters
- Jun 3, 2011
- 1,320
- 45
So all day yesterday and so far all day today, I've been fiddling with my L96 trying to sort various problems out.
During this, I realised I only need 4 more parts before I can make a whole new gun out of the spares I have lying around.
Obviously it would be somewhat pointless to build another 500 FPS, full length L96 out of these parts.
So, I've decided I want a short barrelled L96, to run at around 400 FPS. Plan on putting foam all the way down the outer barrel, fitting a silencer (for looks), packing the stock with foam, putting a smaller, low-powered optic on it rather than a full on scope, and using it for urban game days. Because it will primarily be used at urban, I thought a smaller barrel would be more suiting, which brings the question; how short is too short?
I'm not on about for looks (well maybe a little bit), because that's all personal preference and opinion based, but I mean for performance.
To get the look I want, the inner barrel may have to be as short as 200mm, which is 295mm shorter than the original length (495mm).
Will I notice a massive drop in performance by using a 200mm barrel? What about a 300mm barrel, or even a 363mm (standard M4 length) barrel?
The above is all about sniper rifles, but, use this thread for discussion about other guns too.
What's the shortest barrel you can put in an AEG without suffering massive performance loss? I know an MP5 has a short barrel, yet I've seen some pretty accurate and long-range MP5s around before.
What about pistols? My TM Glock 17 has an accurate range of around 30m, it doesn't really go any further than that. If I were to stick a longer barrel in it, would this change anything? Increase accuracy and range, or maybe decrease them due to the amount of gas actually released per trigger pull.
And finally, if anyone has a short barrelled rifle, or a long barrelled pistol for that matter, feel free to post pictures of them here and state what's good, what's bad and what made you go for that specific barrel length.
During this, I realised I only need 4 more parts before I can make a whole new gun out of the spares I have lying around.
Obviously it would be somewhat pointless to build another 500 FPS, full length L96 out of these parts.
So, I've decided I want a short barrelled L96, to run at around 400 FPS. Plan on putting foam all the way down the outer barrel, fitting a silencer (for looks), packing the stock with foam, putting a smaller, low-powered optic on it rather than a full on scope, and using it for urban game days. Because it will primarily be used at urban, I thought a smaller barrel would be more suiting, which brings the question; how short is too short?
I'm not on about for looks (well maybe a little bit), because that's all personal preference and opinion based, but I mean for performance.
To get the look I want, the inner barrel may have to be as short as 200mm, which is 295mm shorter than the original length (495mm).
Will I notice a massive drop in performance by using a 200mm barrel? What about a 300mm barrel, or even a 363mm (standard M4 length) barrel?
The above is all about sniper rifles, but, use this thread for discussion about other guns too.
What's the shortest barrel you can put in an AEG without suffering massive performance loss? I know an MP5 has a short barrel, yet I've seen some pretty accurate and long-range MP5s around before.
What about pistols? My TM Glock 17 has an accurate range of around 30m, it doesn't really go any further than that. If I were to stick a longer barrel in it, would this change anything? Increase accuracy and range, or maybe decrease them due to the amount of gas actually released per trigger pull.
And finally, if anyone has a short barrelled rifle, or a long barrelled pistol for that matter, feel free to post pictures of them here and state what's good, what's bad and what made you go for that specific barrel length.
Last edited by a moderator: